MSH2 stimulates interfering and inhibits non-interfering crossovers in response to genetic polymorphism.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 10 2023
23 10 2023
Historique:
received:
17
04
2023
accepted:
13
10
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
24
10
2023
entrez:
23
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Meiotic crossovers can be formed through the interfering pathway, in which one crossover prevents another from forming nearby, or by an independent non-interfering pathway. In Arabidopsis, local sequence polymorphism between homologs can stimulate interfering crossovers in a MSH2-dependent manner. To understand how MSH2 regulates crossovers formed by the two pathways, we combined Arabidopsis mutants that elevate non-interfering crossovers with msh2 mutants. We demonstrate that MSH2 blocks non-interfering crossovers at polymorphic loci, which is the opposite effect to interfering crossovers. We also observe MSH2-independent crossover inhibition at highly polymorphic sites. We measure recombination along the chromosome arms in lines differing in patterns of heterozygosity and observe a MSH2-dependent crossover increase at the boundaries between heterozygous and homozygous regions. Here, we show that MSH2 is a master regulator of meiotic DSB repair in Arabidopsis, with antagonistic effects on interfering and non-interfering crossovers, which shapes the crossover landscape in relation to interhomolog polymorphism.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37872134
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42511-z
pii: 10.1038/s41467-023-42511-z
pmc: PMC10593791
doi:
Substances chimiques
MutS Homolog 2 Protein
EC 3.6.1.3
Arabidopsis Proteins
0
MSH2 protein, Arabidopsis
EC 3.6.1.3
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6716Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Villeneuve, A. M. & Hillers, K. J. Whence meiosis? Cell 106, 647–650 (2001).
pubmed: 11572770
Mercier, R., Mézard, C., Jenczewski, E., Macaisne, N. & Grelon, M. The molecular biology of meiosis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 66, 297–327 (2015).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035923
pubmed: 25494464
Wang, Y. & Copenhaver, G. P. Meiotic recombination: mixing it up in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 13.1–13.33 (2018).
Barton, N. H. & Charlesworth, B. Why sex and recombination? Science 281, 1986–1990 (1998).
pubmed: 9748151
Henderson, I. R. & Bomblies, K. Evolution and plasticity of genome-wide meiotic recombination rates. Annu. Rev. Genet. 55, 23–43 (2021).
pubmed: 34310193
Ziolkowski, P. A. Why do plants need the ZMM crossover pathway? A snapshot of meiotic recombination from the perspective of interhomolog polymorphism. Plant Reprod. 36, 43–54 (2022).
pubmed: 35819509
pmcid: 9958190
Zelkowski, M., Olson, M. A., Wang, M. & Pawlowski, W. Diversity and determinants of meiotic recombination landscapes. Trends Genet 35, 359–370 (2019).
pubmed: 30948240
Lloyd, A. Crossover patterning in plants. Plant Reprod. 36, 55–72 (2022).
pubmed: 35834006
pmcid: 9957876
Mercier, R. et al. Two meiotic crossover classes cohabit in Arabidopsis: one is dependent on MER3, whereas the other one is not. Curr. Biol. 15, 692–701 (2005).
pubmed: 15854901
Holloway, J. K., Booth, J., Edelmann, W., McGowan, C. H. & Cohen, P. E. MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1-MLH3-independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000186 (2008).
pubmed: 18787696
pmcid: 2525838
Morgan, C. et al. Diffusion-mediated HEI10 coarsening can explain meiotic crossover positioning in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 12, 4674 (2021).
pubmed: 34344879
pmcid: 8333306
von Diezmann, L. & Rog, O. Let’s get physical—mechanisms of crossover interference. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs255745 (2021).
Wang, M. et al. The central element protein ZEP1 of the synaptonemal complex regulates the number of crossovers during meiosis in rice. Plant Cell 22, 417–430 (2010).
pubmed: 20154151
pmcid: 2845403
Capilla-Pérez, L. et al. The synaptonemal complex imposes crossover interference and heterochiasmy in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023613118 (2021).
pubmed: 33723072
pmcid: 8000504
France, M. G. et al. ZYP1 is required for obligate cross-over formation and cross-over interference in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021671118 (2021).
pubmed: 33782125
pmcid: 8040812
Ziolkowski, P. A. et al. Natural variation and dosage of the HEI10 meiotic E3 ligase control Arabidopsis crossover recombination. Genes Dev. 31, 306–317 (2017).
pubmed: 28223312
pmcid: 5358726
Lian, Q., Jing, J., Ernst, M., Grelon, M. & Mercier, R. Joint control of meiotic crossover patterning by the synaptonemal complex and HEI10 dosage. Nat. Commun. 13, 5999 (2022).
pubmed: 36224180
pmcid: 9556546
Kim, J. et al. Arabidopsis HEAT SHOCK FACTOR BINDING PROTEIN is required to limit meiotic crossovers and HEI 10 transcription. EMBO J. 41, e109958 (2022).
Oh, S. D. et al. BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130, 259–272 (2007).
pubmed: 17662941
pmcid: 2034285
Crismani, W. et al. FANCM limits meiotic crossovers. Science 336, 1588–1590 (2012).
pubmed: 22723424
Knoll, A. et al. The Fanconi anemia ortholog FANCM ensures ordered homologous recombination in both somatic and meiotic cells in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 1448–1464 (2012).
pubmed: 22547783
pmcid: 3398556
Séguéla-Arnaud, M. et al. RMI1 and TOP3alpha limit meiotic CO formation through their C-terminal domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 1860–1871 (2017).
pubmed: 27965412
Séguéla-Arnaud, M. et al. Multiple mechanisms limit meiotic crossovers: TOP3α and two BLM homologs antagonize crossovers in parallel to FANCM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4713–4718 (2015).
Fernandes, J. B., Seguéla-Arnaud, M., Larchevêque, C., Lloyd, A. H. & Mercier, R. Unleashing meiotic crossovers in hybrid plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2431–2436 (2017).
pubmed: 29183972
pmcid: 5877974
Desjardins, S. D. et al. FANCM promotes class I interfering crossovers and suppresses class II non-interfering crossovers in wheat meiosis. Nat. Commun. 3, 3644 (2022).
Blary, A. et al. FANCM limits meiotic crossovers in Brassica crops. Front. Plant Sci. 368, 9 (2018).
de Maagd, R. A. et al. CRISPR/Cas inactivation of RECQ4 increases homeologous crossovers in an interspecific tomato hybrid. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 805–813 (2020).
pubmed: 31483929
Higgins, J. D., Armstrong, S. J., Franklin, F. C. H. & Jones, G. H. The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 18, 2557–2570 (2004).
pubmed: 15489296
pmcid: 529542
Chelysheva, L. et al. Zip4/Spo22 is required for class I CO formation but not for synapsis completion in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 3, e83 (2007).
pubmed: 17530928
pmcid: 1877879
Osman, K., Higgins, J. D., Sanchez-Moran, E., Armstrong, S. J. & Franklin, F. C. H. Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. N. Phytol. 190, 523–544 (2011).
Spencer, C. C. A. et al. The influence of recombination on human genetic diversity. PLoS Genet. 2, e148 (2006).
pubmed: 17044736
pmcid: 1575889
Choi, K. et al. Arabidopsis meiotic crossover hot spots overlap with H2A.Z nucleosomes at gene promoters. Nat. Genet. 45, 1327–1336 (2013).
pubmed: 24056716
Kianian, P. M. A. et al. High-resolution crossover mapping reveals similarities and differences of male and female recombination in maize. Nat. Commun. 9, 2370 (2018).
pubmed: 29915302
pmcid: 6006299
Wijnker, E. et al. The genomic landscape of meiotic crossovers and gene conversions in Arabidopsis thaliana. eLife 2, e01426 (2013).
pubmed: 24347547
pmcid: 3865688
Yelina, N. E. et al. DNA methylation epigenetically silences crossover hot spots and controls chromosomal domains of meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 29, 2183–2202 (2015).
pubmed: 26494791
pmcid: 4617981
Shilo, S., Melamed-Bessudo, C., Dorone, Y., Barkai, N. & Levy, A. A. DNA crossover motifs associated with epigenetic modifications delineate open chromatin regions in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27, tpc.15.00391 (2015).
Choi, K. et al. Nucleosomes and DNA methylation shape meiotic DSB frequency in Arabidopsis transposons and gene regulatory regions. Genome Res. 28, 532–546 (2018).
pubmed: 29530928
pmcid: 5880243
Underwood, C. J. et al. Epigenetic activation of meiotic recombination near Arabidopsis thaliana centromeres via loss of H3K9me2 and non-CG DNA methylation. Genome Res. 28, 519–531 (2018).
pubmed: 29530927
pmcid: 5880242
Fernandes, J. B., Wlodzimierz, P. & Henderson, I. R. Meiotic recombination within plant centromeres. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 48, 26–35 (2019).
pubmed: 30954771
Lian, Q. et al. The megabase-scale crossover landscape is largely independent of sequence divergence. Nat. Commun. 13, 3828 (2022).
pubmed: 35780220
pmcid: 9250513
Rowan, B. A. et al. An ultra high-density Arabidopsis thaliana crossover. Genetics 213, 771–787 (2019).
pubmed: 31527048
pmcid: 6827372
Borts, R. H. & Haber, J. E. Meiotic recombination in yeast: alteration by multiple heterozygosities. Science 237, 1459–1465 (1987).
pubmed: 2820060
Dooner, H. K. Genetic fine structure of the BRONZE locus in maize. Genetics 113, 1021–1036 (1986).
pubmed: 17246338
pmcid: 1202909
Baudat, F. & De Massy, B. Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis. Chromosome. Res. 15, 565–577 (2007).
pubmed: 17674146
Cole, F., Keeney, S. & Jasin, M. Comprehensive, fine-scale dissection of homologous recombination outcomes at a hot spot in mouse meiosis. Mol. Cell 39, 700–710 (2010).
pubmed: 20832722
pmcid: 3196603
Serra, H. et al. Interhomolog polymorphism shapes meiotic crossover within the Arabidopsis RAC1 and RPP13 disease resistance genes. PLoS Genet. 14, 1–28 (2018).
Dluzewska, J., Szymanska, M. & Ziolkowski, P. A. Where to cross over? Defining crossover sites in plants. Front. Genet. 9, 609 (2018).
pubmed: 30619450
pmcid: 6299014
Ziolkowski, P. A. et al. Juxtaposition of heterozygous and homozygous regions causes reciprocal crossover remodelling via interference during Arabidopsis meiosis. eLife 4, e03708 (2015).
pubmed: 25815584
pmcid: 4407271
Blackwell, A. R. et al. MSH2 shapes the meiotic crossover landscape in relation to interhomolog polymorphism in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 39, e104858 (2020).
pubmed: 32935357
pmcid: 7604573
Szymanska-Lejman, M. et al. The effect of DNA polymorphisms and natural variation on crossover hotspot activity in Arabidopsis hybrids. Nat. Commun. 14, 33 (2023).
pubmed: 36596804
pmcid: 9810609
Datta, A., Hendrix, M., Lipsitch, M. & Jinks-Robertson, S. Dual roles for DNA sequence identity and the mismatch repair system in the regulation of mitotic crossing-over in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9757–9762 (1997).
pubmed: 9275197
pmcid: 23263
Wu, S. Y., Culligan, K., Lamers, M. & Hays, J. Dissimilar mispair-recognition spectra of Arabidopsis DNA-mismatch-repair proteins MSH2·MSH6 (MutSα) and MSH2·MSH7 (MutSγ). Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 6027–6034 (2003).
pubmed: 14530450
pmcid: 219466
Chakraborty, U. & Alani, E. Understanding how mismatch repair proteins participate in the repair/anti-recombination decision. FEMS Yeast Res. 16, 1–12 (2016).
Emmanuel, E., Yehuda, E., Melamed-Bessudo, C., Avivi-Ragolsky, N. & Levy, A. A. The role of AtMSH2 in homologous recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO Rep. 7, 100–105 (2006).
pubmed: 16311517
Tam, S. M., Hays, J. B. & Chetelat, R. T. Effects of suppressing the DNA mismatch repair system on homeologous recombination in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123, 1445–1458 (2011).
pubmed: 21870137
Manhart, C. M. & Alani, E. Roles for mismatch repair family proteins in promoting meiotic crossing over. DNA Repair. 38, 84–93 (2016).
pubmed: 26686657
Girard, C. et al. AAA-ATPase FIDGETIN-LIKE 1 and helicase FANCM antagonize meiotic crossovers by distinct mechanisms. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005369 (2015).
pubmed: 26161528
pmcid: 4498898
Chen, W. & Jinks-Robertson, S. The role of the mismatch repair machinery in regulating mitotic and meiotic recombination between diverged sequences in yeast. Genetics 151, 1299–1313 (1999).
pubmed: 10101158
pmcid: 1460550
Elliott, B. & Jasin, M. Repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination in mismatch repair-defective mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 2671–2682 (2001).
pubmed: 11283247
pmcid: 86898
Cooper, T. J. et al. Mismatch repair disturbs meiotic class I crossover control. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/480418 (2021).
Moran, E. S., Armstrong, S. J., Santos, J. L., Franklin, F. C. H. & Jones, G. H. Chiasma formation in Arabidopsis thaliana accession Wassileskija and in two meiotic mutants. Chromosome. Res. 9, 121–128 (2001).
Melamed-Bessudo, C., Yehuda, E., Stuitje, A. R. & Levy, A. A. A new seed-based assay for meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 43, 458–466 (2005).
pubmed: 16045480
Francis, K. E. et al. Pollen tetrad-based visual assay for meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3913–3918 (2007).
pubmed: 17360452
pmcid: 1805420
Rowan, B. A., Patel, V., Weigel, D. & Schneeberger, K. Rapid and inexpensive whole-genome genotyping-by-sequencing for crossover localization and fine-scale genetic mapping. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genet. 5, 385–398 (2015).
pubmed: 25585881
pmcid: 4349092
Li, X. et al. Fanconi anemia ortholog FANCM regulates meiotic crossover distribution in plants. Plant Physiol. 186, 344–360 (2021).
pubmed: 33576801
pmcid: 8154078
Serra, H. et al. Massive crossover elevation via combination of HEI10 and recq4a recq4b during Arabidopsis meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2437–2442 (2018).
pubmed: 29463699
pmcid: 5877939
Wu, G., Rossidivito, G., Hu, T., Berlyand, Y. & Poethig, R. S. Traffic lines: new tools for genetic analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 200, 35–45 (2015).
pubmed: 25711279
pmcid: 4423376
Naish, M. et al. The genetic and epigenetic landscape of the Arabidopsis centromeres. Science 374, eabi7489 (2021).
pubmed: 34762468
pmcid: 10164409
Kawakatsu, T. et al. Epigenomic diversity in a global collection of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Cell 166, 492–505 (2016).
pubmed: 27419873
pmcid: 5172462
Berchowitz, L. E. & Copenhaver, G. P. Fluorescent Arabidopsis tetrads: a visual assay for quickly developing large crossover and crossover interference data sets. Nat. Protoc. 3, 41–50 (2008).
pubmed: 18193020
Giraut, L. et al. Genome-wide crossover distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana meiosis reveals sex-specific patterns along chromosomes. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002354 (2011).
pubmed: 22072983
pmcid: 3207851
Drouaud, J. et al. Sex-specific crossover distributions and variations in interference level along Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 4. PLoS Genet. 3, e106 (2007).
pubmed: 17604455
pmcid: 1904369
Yelina, N. E. et al. High-throughput analysis of meiotic crossover frequency and interference via flow cytometry of fluorescent pollen in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2119–2134 (2013).
pubmed: 24113785
Berchowitz, L. E., Francis, K. E., Bey, A. L. & Copenhaver, G. P. The role of AtMUS81 in interference-insensitive crossovers in A. thaliana. PLoS Genet. 3, e132 (2007).
pubmed: 17696612
pmcid: 1941751
Higgins, J. D., Buckling, E. F., Franklin, F. C. H. & Jones, G. H. Expression and functional analysis of AtMUS81 in Arabidopsis meiosis reveals a role in the second pathway of crossing-over. Plant J. 54, 152–162 (2008).
pubmed: 18182028
Myung, K., Datta, A., Chen, C. & Kolodner, R. D. SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat. Genet. 27, 113–116 (2001).
pubmed: 11138010
Sugawara, N., Goldfarb, T., Studamire, B., Alani, E. & Haber, J. E. Heteroduplex rejection during single-strand annealing requires Sgs1 helicase and mismatch repair proteins Msh2 and Msh6 but not Pms1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9315–9320 (2004).
pubmed: 15199178
pmcid: 438974
Rogacheva, M. V. et al. Mlh1-Mlh3, a meiotic crossover and DNA mismatch repair factor, is a Msh2-Msh3-stimulated endonuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 5664–5673 (2014).
pubmed: 24403070
pmcid: 3937641
Puchta, H. The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 1–14 (2005).
pubmed: 15557293
Dorn, A. & Puchta, H. DNA helicases as safekeepers of genome stability in plants. Genes 10, 1028 (2019).
pubmed: 31835565
pmcid: 6947026
Gerton, J. L. & Hawley, R. S. Homologous chromosome interactions in meiosis: diversity amidst conservation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 477–487 (2005).
pubmed: 15931171
De Storme, N. & Mason, A. Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Curr. Plant Biol. 1, 10–33 (2014).
Bozdag, G. O. et al. Breaking a species barrier by enabling hybrid recombination. Curr. Biol. 31, R180–R181 (2020).
Hartung, F., Suer, S. & Puchta, H. Two closely related RecQ helicases have antagonistic roles in homologous recombination and DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18836–18841 (2007).
pubmed: 18000056
pmcid: 2141863
Zhu, L. et al. Natural variation identifies SNI1, the SMC5/6 component, as a modifier of meiotic crossover in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021970118 (2021).
pubmed: 34385313
pmcid: 8379953
Langmea, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2013).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
pubmed: 19451168
pmcid: 2705234
Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987–2993 (2011).
pubmed: 21903627
pmcid: 3198575
Zapata, L. et al. Chromosome-level assembly of Arabidopsis thaliana L er reveals the extent of translocation and inversion polymorphisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4052–E4060 (2016).
pubmed: 27354520
pmcid: 4948326
Kbiri, N., Dluzewska, J., Henderson, I. R. & Ziolkowski, P. A. Quantifying meiotic crossover recombination in Arabidopsis lines expressing fluorescent reporters in seeds using SeedScoring Pipeline for CellProfiler. Methods Mol. Biol. 2484, 121–134 (2022).
pubmed: 35461449
Carpenter, A. E. et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 7, R100 (2006).
pubmed: 17076895
pmcid: 1794559
Bieluszewski, T., Szymanska-Lejman, M., Dziegielewski, W., Zhu, L. & Ziolkowski, P. A. Efficient generation of CRISPR/Cas9-based mutants supported by fluorescent seed selection in different Arabidopsis accessions. Methods Mol. Biol. 2484, 161–182 (2022).
pubmed: 35461452
Bieluszewski, T. et al. NuA4 and H2A.Z control environmental responses and autotrophic growth in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 13, 277 (2022).
pubmed: 35022409
pmcid: 8755797
Rueden, C. T. et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinforma. 18, 529 (2017).
Copenhaver, G. P. et al. Genetic definition and sequence analysis of Arabidopsis centromeres. Science 286, 2468–2474 (1999).
pubmed: 10617454