Rapid prototyping of models for COVID-19 outbreak detection in workplaces.
Decision making
Infectious disease modelling
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Oct 2023
23 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
06
03
2023
accepted:
15
10
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
24
10
2023
entrez:
23
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early case detection is critical to preventing onward transmission of COVID-19 by enabling prompt isolation of index infections, and identification and quarantining of contacts. Timeliness and completeness of ascertainment depend on the surveillance strategy employed. This paper presents modelling used to inform workplace testing strategies for the Australian government in early 2021. We use rapid prototype modelling to quickly investigate the effectiveness of testing strategies to aid decision making. Models are developed with a focus on providing relevant results to policy makers, and these models are continually updated and improved as new questions are posed. Developed to support the implementation of testing strategies in high risk workplace settings in Australia, our modelling explores the effects of test frequency and sensitivity on outbreak detection. We start with an exponential growth model, which demonstrates how outbreak detection changes depending on growth rate, test frequency and sensitivity. From the exponential model, we learn that low sensitivity tests can produce high probabilities of detection when testing occurs frequently. We then develop a more complex Agent Based Model, which was used to test the robustness of the results from the exponential model, and extend it to include intermittent workplace scheduling. These models help our fundamental understanding of disease detectability through routine surveillance in workplaces and evaluate the impact of testing strategies and workplace characteristics on the effectiveness of surveillance. This analysis highlights the risks of particular work patterns while also identifying key testing strategies to best improve outbreak detection in high risk workplaces.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37872480
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08713-y
pii: 10.1186/s12879-023-08713-y
pmc: PMC10591376
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
713Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 8;21(1):929
pubmed: 34496760
BMC Med. 2021 Apr 27;19(1):106
pubmed: 33902581
Infect Dis Model. 2022 Mar;7(1):184-198
pubmed: 34977439
Med J Aust. 2021 Dec 13;215(11):509-510
pubmed: 34708409
PLoS Med. 2020 Jan 9;17(1):e1003018
pubmed: 31917786
Viruses. 2021 Mar 01;13(3):
pubmed: 33804556
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 22;274(1609):599-604
pubmed: 17476782
Science. 2022 May 6;376(6593):579-580
pubmed: 35511985
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 02;11:1150810
pubmed: 37333560
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3:CD013705
pubmed: 33760236
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 12;18(8):e1003735
pubmed: 34383750
Viruses. 2021 Mar 11;13(3):
pubmed: 33799660
Epidemics. 2021 Dec;37:100503
pubmed: 34610549
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1205-1211
pubmed: 32546824
Sci Adv. 2022 Apr 8;8(14):eabm3624
pubmed: 35394833