Educational value of mixed reality combined with a three-dimensional printed model of aortic disease for vascular surgery in the standardized residency training of surgical residents in China: a case control study.
MiSSES
Mixed reality
Standardized residency training
Three-dimensional printed model
Vascular surgery
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Oct 2023
27 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
21
09
2022
accepted:
24
08
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
28
10
2023
entrez:
27
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The simulated three-dimensional (3D) printed anatomical model of the aorta, which has become the norm in medical education, has poor authenticity, tactility, feasibility, and interactivity. Therefore, this study explored the educational value and effect of mixed reality (MR) combined with a 3D printed model of aortic disease in training surgical residents. Fifty-one resident physicians who rotated in vascular surgery were selected and divided into traditional (27) and experimental (24) teaching groups using the random number table method. After undergoing the experimental and traditional training routines on aortic disease, both the groups took a theoretical test on aortic disease and an assessment of the simulation based on the Michigan Standard Simulation Experience Scale (MiSSES) template. Their scores and assessment results were compared. The study was conducted at the Department of Vascular Surgery of Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. In the theoretical test on aortic disease, the experimental teaching group obtained higher mean total scores (79.0 ± 9.1 vs. 72.6 ± 7.5, P = 0.013) and higher scores in anatomy/ pathophysiology (30.8 ± 5.4 vs. 24.8 ± 5.8; P < 0.001) than the traditional teaching group. The differences in their scores in the differential diagnosis (25.8 ± 3.0 vs. 23.3 ± 4.9; P = 0.078) and treatment (22.5 ± 11.8 vs. 24.5 ± 8.2; P = 0.603) sessions were insignificant. The MR-assisted teaching stratified the vascular residents through the MiSSES survey. Overall, 95.8% residents (23/24) strongly or somewhat agreed that the MR was adequately realistic and the curriculum helped improve the ability to understanding aortic diseases. Further, 91.7% residents (22/24) strongly or somewhat agreed that the MR-assisted teaching was a good training tool for knowledge on aortic diseases. All residents responded with "Good" or "Outstanding" on the overall rating of the MR experience. MR combined with the 3D printed model helped residents understand and master aortic disease, particularly regarding anatomy and pathophysiology. Additionally, the realistic 3D printing and MR models improved the self-efficacy of residents in studying aortic diseases, thus greatly stimulating their enthusiasm and initiative to study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The simulated three-dimensional (3D) printed anatomical model of the aorta, which has become the norm in medical education, has poor authenticity, tactility, feasibility, and interactivity. Therefore, this study explored the educational value and effect of mixed reality (MR) combined with a 3D printed model of aortic disease in training surgical residents.
METHOD
METHODS
Fifty-one resident physicians who rotated in vascular surgery were selected and divided into traditional (27) and experimental (24) teaching groups using the random number table method. After undergoing the experimental and traditional training routines on aortic disease, both the groups took a theoretical test on aortic disease and an assessment of the simulation based on the Michigan Standard Simulation Experience Scale (MiSSES) template. Their scores and assessment results were compared. The study was conducted at the Department of Vascular Surgery of Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the theoretical test on aortic disease, the experimental teaching group obtained higher mean total scores (79.0 ± 9.1 vs. 72.6 ± 7.5, P = 0.013) and higher scores in anatomy/ pathophysiology (30.8 ± 5.4 vs. 24.8 ± 5.8; P < 0.001) than the traditional teaching group. The differences in their scores in the differential diagnosis (25.8 ± 3.0 vs. 23.3 ± 4.9; P = 0.078) and treatment (22.5 ± 11.8 vs. 24.5 ± 8.2; P = 0.603) sessions were insignificant. The MR-assisted teaching stratified the vascular residents through the MiSSES survey. Overall, 95.8% residents (23/24) strongly or somewhat agreed that the MR was adequately realistic and the curriculum helped improve the ability to understanding aortic diseases. Further, 91.7% residents (22/24) strongly or somewhat agreed that the MR-assisted teaching was a good training tool for knowledge on aortic diseases. All residents responded with "Good" or "Outstanding" on the overall rating of the MR experience.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
MR combined with the 3D printed model helped residents understand and master aortic disease, particularly regarding anatomy and pathophysiology. Additionally, the realistic 3D printing and MR models improved the self-efficacy of residents in studying aortic diseases, thus greatly stimulating their enthusiasm and initiative to study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37891526
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04610-9
pii: 10.1186/s12909-023-04610-9
pmc: PMC10612237
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
812Subventions
Organisme : Beijing Natural Science Foundation
ID : 7224347
Organisme : Beijing Natural Science Foundation
ID : 7202214
Organisme : Peking University Health Science Center Medical Education Research Funding Project
ID : 2020YB02
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81970409
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Surgery. 2014 Sep;156(3):718-22
pubmed: 25175506
Simul Healthc. 2023 Feb 1;18(1):42-50
pubmed: 35136005
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 6;55(14):e27-e129
pubmed: 20359588
Med J Malaysia. 2019 Feb;74(1):67-78
pubmed: 30846666
Anat Sci Educ. 2021 May;14(3):385-393
pubmed: 33465814
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873-926
pubmed: 25173340
Simul Healthc. 2008 Spring;3(1):10-5
pubmed: 19088637
Clin Anat. 2019 Mar;32(2):238-243
pubmed: 30295333
Cureus. 2020 Feb 24;12(2):e7085
pubmed: 32226686
Ann Anat. 2016 Nov;208:151-157
pubmed: 26996541
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(13):1074
pubmed: 34422986