Reducing starch digestibility of white rice by structuring with hydrocolloids.

Controlling starch digestion in high glycaemic index staple foods such as white rice is of interest as it has been associated with reduced risk for conditions such as obesity and type-2 diabetes mellitus. Addition of hydrocolloids has been proposed to reduce the rate of post-prandial glucose by controlling the rate of starch hydrolysis. In this work, the potential of a range of hydrocolloids to modify starch digestibility when added (at 1 % maximum concentration) during cooking of white rice was first investigated. Low acyl gellan gum (LAG) showed the highest potential (in-vitro estimated Glycaemic Index reduced by about 20 %, from 94 in the control to 78 in the LAG rice) and was investigated further. While the grains of rice control and rice with LAG appeared similar, SEM images revealed a gel-like layer (a few micrometers in thickness) on the surface of the treated samples. Addition of LAG appeared to also have an effect on the breakdown of a simulated cm-sized bolus. During gastric digestion, bolus breakdown of the rice control was completed after 30 min, while the rice LAG bolus appeared intact after 1 h of observation. This was attributed to strengthening of the LAG gel in the acidic environment of the stomach. During intestinal digestion, rice samples containing 1 % LAG appeared to be less susceptible to breakdown when seen under a microscope and in environmental SEM, while they showed larger rice particle aggregates, compared to rice control. Overall, LAG showed potential to control starch digestion kinetics of white rice with a mechanism that may involve formation of a protective layer on the rice grains (um) that reduces bolus break down (cm) and enzymatic hydrolysis (nm). Outcomes of this work will be used to identify conditions for further relevant in-vitro and in-vivo investigations.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.