Impact of zero anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy followed by whole stomach reconstruction for esophageal cancer: prospective cohort study.
Anastomotic leakage
Esophageal cancer
Esophagectomy
Whole stomach
Journal
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
ISSN: 1435-2451
Titre abrégé: Langenbecks Arch Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9808285
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Nov 2023
30 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
27
09
2023
accepted:
19
11
2023
medline:
1
12
2023
pubmed:
30
11
2023
entrez:
29
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The stomach is the most common organ which is used for reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. It is controversial which is better narrow gastric tube reconstruction or whole stomach reconstruction to prevent anastomotic leakage. From August 2022 to March 2023, we started a prospective cohort study of whole stomach reconstruction after esophagectomy. Until then (from January 2018 to July 2022), narrow gastric tube reconstruction was performed as a standard reconstruction. Narrow gastric tube reconstruction and whole stomach reconstruction were performed in 183 patients and 20 patients, respectively. The patient's characteristics were not significantly different between the narrow gastric tube group and the whole stomach group. In particular, for all patients in the whole stomach reconstruction group, retrosternal route and esophagogastrostomy by hand sewn were applied. There were no occurrences of AL through the continuous 20 cases in the whole stomach group, otherwise 42 (22.9%) patients in the narrow gastric group (P = 0.016). Postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter in the whole stomach group than in the narrow gastric group (21 days vs. 28 days, P < .001). Blood perfusions were evaluated by indocyanine green for all cases, which had very good blood perfusion in all cases. Additionally, quantitative blood perfusion was examined by SPY-QP (Stryker, USA) for one case. Even the edge of the fornix showed more than 90% blood perfusion levels when the antrum was fixed as the reference point. Whole stomach reconstruction with excellent blood perfusion is considered to be safe and has the possibility to prevent from occurring AL after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38030888
doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03191-x
pii: 10.1007/s00423-023-03191-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
451Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
D’Journo XB, Boulate D, Fourdrain A, Loundou A, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, O’Neill JR, Hoelscher A, Piessen G, van Lanschot J, Wijnhoven B, Jobe B, Davies A, Schneider PM, Pera M, Nilsson M, Nafteux P, Kitagawa Y, Morse CR, Hofstetter W, Molena D, So JB, Immanuel A, Parsons SL, Larsen MH, Dolan JP, Wood SG, Maynard N, Smithers M, Puig S, Law S, Wong I, Kennedy A, KangNing W, Reynolds JV, Pramesh CS, Ferguson M, Darling G, Schröder W, Bludau M, Underwood T, van Hillegersberg R, Chang A, Cecconello I, Ribeiro U Jr, de Manzoni G, Rosati R, Kuppusamy M, Thomas PA, Low DE (2021) Risk prediction model of 90-day mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. JAMA Surg 156:836–845. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2376
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2376
pubmed: 34160587
pmcid: 8223144
van Rossum PSN, Haverkamp L, Carvello M, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R (2017) Management and outcome of cervical versus intrathoracic manifestation of cervical anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus 30:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12472
doi: 10.1111/dote.12472
pubmed: 28859388
Hayata K, Nakamori M, Nakamura M, Ojima T, Iwahashi M, Katsuda M, Tsuji T, Kato T, Kitadani J, Takeuchi A, Tabata H, Yamaue H (2017) Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surgery 162:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.013
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.013
pubmed: 28318550
Hirano Y, Kaneko H, Konishi T, Itoh H, Matsuda S, Kawakubo H, Uda K, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Itano O, Yasunaga H, Kitagawa Y (2023) Impact of body mass index on major complications, multiple complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a nationwide inpatient database study in Japan. Ann Surg 277:e785–e792. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000005321
doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005321
pubmed: 35129484
Kitadani J, Ojima T, Nakamura M, Hayata K, Katsuda M, Takeuchi A, Yamaue H (2022) Impact of anastomotic leakage on survival for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer performed with esophagectomy followed by right colon interposition. J Gastrointest Surg 26:1090–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05196-7
doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05196-7
pubmed: 34755311
Ishikawa Y, Chang AC, Lin J, Orringer MB, Lynch WR, Lagisetty KH, Wakeam E, Reddy RM (2023) Wider gastric conduit morphology is associated with improved blood flow during esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 27:845–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05530-7
doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05530-7
pubmed: 36526829
Yoshida K, Tanaka Y, Imai T, Sato Y, Hatanaka Y, Suetsugu T, Okumura N, Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Yamaguchi K (2020) Subtotal stomach in esophageal reconstruction surgery achieves an anastomotic leakage rate of less than 1%. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 4:422–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12336
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12336
pubmed: 32724886
pmcid: 7382430
Rice TW, Patil DT, Blackstone EH (2017) 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 6:119–130. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2017.03.14
doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.14
pubmed: 28447000
pmcid: 5387145
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
pubmed: 19638912
Nakai T, Kitadani J, Ojima T, Hayata K, Katsuda M, Goda T, Takeuchi A, Tominaga S, Fukuda N, Nagano S, Yamaue H (2022) Feeding jejunostomy following esophagectomy may increase the occurrence of postoperative small bowel obstruction. Medicine (Baltimore) 101:e30746. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000030746
doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000030746
pubmed: 36123872
Markar SR, Arya S, Karthikesalingam A, Hanna GB (2013) Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20:4274–4281. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3189-x
doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3189-x
pubmed: 23943033
Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Alicuben ET, Oh DS, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR (2015) Intraoperative assessment of perfusion of the gastric graft and correlation with anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 262:74–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000811
doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000811
pubmed: 25029436
Kikuchi H, Endo H, Yamamoto H, Ozawa S, Miyata H, Kakeji Y, Matsubara H, Doki Y, Kitagawa Y, Takeuchi H (2022) Impact of reconstruction route on postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy: analysis of esophagectomies in the Japanese National Clinical Database. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 6:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12501
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12501
pubmed: 35106414
Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, Igaki H, Ozawa S, Abe T, Nakamura K, Kato K, Ando N, Kitagawa Y (2017) Prognostic impact of postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: exploratory analysis of JCOG9907. Ann Surg 265:1152–1157. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001828
doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001828
pubmed: 27280509
Okamura A, Yamamoto H, Watanabe M, Miyata H, Kanaji S, Kamiya K, Kakeji Y, Doki Y, Kitagawa Y (2022) Association between preoperative hba1c levels and complications after esophagectomy: analysis of 15,801 esophagectomies from the National Clinical Database in Japan. Ann Surg 276:e393–e399. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004547
doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004547
pubmed: 33214449