RhMED15a-like, a subunit of the Mediator complex, is involved in the drought stress response in Rosa hybrida.
Rosa
/ genetics
Plant Proteins
/ genetics
Droughts
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
Cyclopentanes
/ metabolism
Oxylipins
/ metabolism
Plant Growth Regulators
/ metabolism
Abscisic Acid
/ metabolism
Stress, Physiological
/ genetics
Arabidopsis
/ genetics
Acetates
/ pharmacology
Plants, Genetically Modified
Plant Viruses
RhMED15a-like
Rosa hybrida
Drought tolerance
Mediator
Phytohormone
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2024
30 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
15
09
2023
accepted:
23
04
2024
medline:
30
4
2024
pubmed:
30
4
2024
entrez:
29
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rose (Rosa hybrida) is a globally recognized ornamental plant whose growth and distribution are strongly limited by drought stress. The role of Mediator, a multiprotein complex crucial for RNA polymerase II-driven transcription, has been elucidated in drought stress responses in plants. However, its physiological function and regulatory mechanism in horticultural crop species remain elusive. In this study, we identified a Tail module subunit of Mediator, RhMED15a-like, in rose. Drought stress, as well as treatment with methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and abscisic acid (ABA), significantly suppressed the transcript level of RhMED15a-like. Overexpressing RhMED15a-like markedly bolstered the osmotic stress tolerance of Arabidopsis, as evidenced by increased germination rate, root length, and fresh weight. In contrast, the silencing of RhMED15a-like through virus induced gene silencing in rose resulted in elevated malondialdehyde accumulation, exacerbated leaf wilting, reduced survival rate, and downregulated expression of drought-responsive genes during drought stress. Additionally, using RNA-seq, we identified 972 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-RhMED15a-like plants and TRV controls. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that some DEGs were predominantly associated with terms related to the oxidative stress response, such as 'response to reactive oxygen species' and 'peroxisome'. Furthermore, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment highlighted pathways related to 'plant hormone signal transduction', in which the majority of DEGs in the jasmonate (JA) and ABA signalling pathways were induced in TRV-RhMED15a-like plants. Our findings underscore the pivotal role of the Mediator subunit RhMED15a-like in the ability of rose to withstand drought stress, probably by controlling the transcript levels of drought-responsive genes and signalling pathway elements of stress-related hormones, providing a solid foundation for future research into the molecular mechanisms underlying drought tolerance in rose.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Rose (Rosa hybrida) is a globally recognized ornamental plant whose growth and distribution are strongly limited by drought stress. The role of Mediator, a multiprotein complex crucial for RNA polymerase II-driven transcription, has been elucidated in drought stress responses in plants. However, its physiological function and regulatory mechanism in horticultural crop species remain elusive.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In this study, we identified a Tail module subunit of Mediator, RhMED15a-like, in rose. Drought stress, as well as treatment with methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and abscisic acid (ABA), significantly suppressed the transcript level of RhMED15a-like. Overexpressing RhMED15a-like markedly bolstered the osmotic stress tolerance of Arabidopsis, as evidenced by increased germination rate, root length, and fresh weight. In contrast, the silencing of RhMED15a-like through virus induced gene silencing in rose resulted in elevated malondialdehyde accumulation, exacerbated leaf wilting, reduced survival rate, and downregulated expression of drought-responsive genes during drought stress. Additionally, using RNA-seq, we identified 972 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-RhMED15a-like plants and TRV controls. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that some DEGs were predominantly associated with terms related to the oxidative stress response, such as 'response to reactive oxygen species' and 'peroxisome'. Furthermore, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment highlighted pathways related to 'plant hormone signal transduction', in which the majority of DEGs in the jasmonate (JA) and ABA signalling pathways were induced in TRV-RhMED15a-like plants.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings underscore the pivotal role of the Mediator subunit RhMED15a-like in the ability of rose to withstand drought stress, probably by controlling the transcript levels of drought-responsive genes and signalling pathway elements of stress-related hormones, providing a solid foundation for future research into the molecular mechanisms underlying drought tolerance in rose.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38684962
doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05059-8
pii: 10.1186/s12870-024-05059-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
Plant Proteins
0
methyl jasmonate
900N171A0F
Cyclopentanes
0
Oxylipins
0
Plant Growth Regulators
0
Abscisic Acid
72S9A8J5GW
Acetates
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
351Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Plant Cell. 2012 Oct;24(10):4220-35
pubmed: 23064321
Nature. 1991 Apr 4;350(6317):436-8
pubmed: 2011193
Mol Cell. 2007 Jun 8;26(5):717-29
pubmed: 17560376
Plant Cell Physiol. 2021 Feb 4;61(12):2153-2166
pubmed: 33165546
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 17;114(42):E8930-E8939
pubmed: 28973940
Mol Plant. 2016 May 2;9(5):650-661
pubmed: 26961720
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 May 31;23(11):
pubmed: 35682844
Biotechnol Adv. 2014 Jan-Feb;32(1):40-52
pubmed: 24091291
Front Plant Sci. 2013 May 13;4:138
pubmed: 23717320
Int J Mol Sci. 2009 Jul 10;10(7):3168-3185
pubmed: 19742130
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul;36(12):3993-4008
pubmed: 18515835
Plant Cell. 2008 Jul;20(7):1899-914
pubmed: 18664614
Plant J. 2007 Sep;51(6):1126-36
pubmed: 17666025
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Sep 17;6:757
pubmed: 26442070
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018 Apr;19(4):262-274
pubmed: 29209056
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013 Dec;12(12):3886-97
pubmed: 24056735
Plant Cell. 2005 Jan;17(1):256-67
pubmed: 15598798
Plant Cell. 2014 Jan;26(1):465-84
pubmed: 24415770
J Exp Bot. 2007;58(2):221-7
pubmed: 17075077
Plant J. 1998 Dec;16(6):735-43
pubmed: 10069079
Plant Mol Biol. 2013 Oct;83(3):219-33
pubmed: 23748738
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 31;12:652453
pubmed: 33868352
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8329-33
pubmed: 8710870
New Phytol. 2021 Mar;229(6):3360-3376
pubmed: 33251584
New Phytol. 2020 Dec;228(5):1573-1590
pubmed: 32619295
Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2019 Oct;1862(10):194432
pubmed: 31525461
Dev Biol. 2016 Nov 1;419(1):7-18
pubmed: 27287881
J Integr Plant Biol. 2020 Jan;62(1):25-54
pubmed: 31850654
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016 Jul;104:17-28
pubmed: 27002402
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009 Apr;12(2):133-9
pubmed: 19179104
Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7781):109-118
pubmed: 31695205
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Jun;10(3):296-302
pubmed: 17468040
Plant Cell Physiol. 1994 Mar;35(2):225-31
pubmed: 8069491
J Exp Bot. 2013 Feb;64(4):847-57
pubmed: 23364936
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Oct 6;35:239-257
pubmed: 31382759
Science. 2011 Mar 18;331(6023):1451-4
pubmed: 21415355
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Sep 3;43(15):7306-14
pubmed: 26138482
Cell. 1990 Jun 29;61(7):1209-15
pubmed: 2163759
Plant Cell. 2019 Jan;31(1):106-127
pubmed: 30610166
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 13;8:993
pubmed: 28659944
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016 Apr 29;67:619-42
pubmed: 26905656
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 25;22(11):
pubmed: 34070465
Plant Cell Environ. 2002 Feb;25(2):131-139
pubmed: 11841658
Science. 2020 Apr 17;368(6488):266-269
pubmed: 32299946
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Nov;11(11):761-72
pubmed: 20940737
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8245-50
pubmed: 21536906
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2011 Apr;21(2):225-30
pubmed: 21330129
PLoS Genet. 2017 Dec 12;13(12):e1007124
pubmed: 29232718
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Jan;146:98-111
pubmed: 31734522
J Plant Physiol. 2009 Mar 15;166(5):531-42
pubmed: 18930563
Hortic Res. 2020 May 2;7:74
pubmed: 32377364
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jul;40(13):5938-50
pubmed: 22447446
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Feb 29;44(4):1591-612
pubmed: 26590257
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2017 Oct;52(5):475-502
pubmed: 28524697
Plant J. 2009 Apr;58(1):97-108
pubmed: 19067974
Planta. 2011 Jul;234(1):97-107
pubmed: 21374086
Plant J. 2010 Mar;61(6):1041-52
pubmed: 20409277
J Mol Biol. 2001 Jan 19;305(3):567-80
pubmed: 11152613
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jun 7;113(23):6562-7
pubmed: 27217573
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010 Mar;17(3):273-9
pubmed: 20154708
Plant Cell. 2012 Jul;24(7):2898-916
pubmed: 22822206
Plant J. 1997 Sep;12(3):557-69
pubmed: 9351242
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2020 Oct;57:78-86
pubmed: 32777679
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Oct 28;12:755539
pubmed: 34777433
Plant Physiol. 2011 Jan;155(1):370-83
pubmed: 21098678
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 27;10:1222
pubmed: 31827491
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Oct 25;7:1550
pubmed: 27826303
Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 Jan 6;51(D1):D418-D427
pubmed: 36350672
Nat Commun. 2014;5:3064
pubmed: 24451981
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 20;21(20):
pubmed: 33092161
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015 Mar;16(3):155-66
pubmed: 25693131
Nat Rev Genet. 2022 Feb;23(2):104-119
pubmed: 34561623
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 20;21(4):
pubmed: 32093336
Plant Signal Behav. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e1428514
pubmed: 29341856
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5073
pubmed: 32193425
Nat Plants. 2019 Mar;5(3):290-299
pubmed: 30833710
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Oct;155:284-296
pubmed: 32795910