Efficacy of bougie first approach for endotracheal intubation with video laryngoscopy during continuous chest compression: a randomized crossover manikin trial.
Anesthesia resident
Bougie
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Continuous chest compression
Endotracheal intubation
First-attempt success
Manikin
Video laryngoscopy
Journal
BMC anesthesiology
ISSN: 1471-2253
Titre abrégé: BMC Anesthesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968535
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 May 2024
21 May 2024
Historique:
received:
02
09
2023
accepted:
14
05
2024
medline:
22
5
2024
pubmed:
22
5
2024
entrez:
21
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Endotracheal intubation is challenging during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and video laryngoscopy has showed benefits for this procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various intubation approaches, including the bougie first, preloaded bougie, endotracheal tube (ETT) with stylet, and ETT without stylet, on first-attempt success using video laryngoscopy during chest compression. This was a randomized crossover trial conducted in a general tertiary teaching hospital. We included anesthesia residents in postgraduate year one to three who passed the screening test. Each resident performed intubation with video laryngoscopy using the four approaches in a randomized sequence on an adult manikin during continuous chest compression. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success defined as starting ventilation within a one minute. A total of 260 endotracheal intubations conducted by 65 residents were randomized and analyzed with 65 procedures in each group. First-attempt success occurred in 64 (98.5%), 57 (87.7%), 56 (86.2%), and 46 (70.8%) intubations in the bougie-first, preloaded bougie, ETT with stylet, and ETT without stylet approaches, respectively. The bougie-first approach had a significantly higher possibility of first-attempt success than the preloaded bougie approach [risk ratio (RR) 8.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 62.16, P = 0.047], the ETT with stylet approach (RR 9.00, 95% CI 1.17 to 69.02, P = 0.035), and the ETT without stylet approach (RR 19.00, 95% CI 2.62 to 137.79, P = 0.004) in the generalized estimating equation logistic model accounting for clustering of intubations operated by the same resident. In addition, the bougie first approach did not result in prolonged intubation or increased self-reported difficulty among the study participants. The bougie first approach with video laryngoscopy had the highest possibility of first-attempt success during chest compression. These results helped inform the intubation approach during CPR. However, further studies in an actual clinical environment are warranted to validate these findings. Clinicaltrials.gov; identifier: NCT05689125; date: January 18, 2023.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Endotracheal intubation is challenging during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and video laryngoscopy has showed benefits for this procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various intubation approaches, including the bougie first, preloaded bougie, endotracheal tube (ETT) with stylet, and ETT without stylet, on first-attempt success using video laryngoscopy during chest compression.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a randomized crossover trial conducted in a general tertiary teaching hospital. We included anesthesia residents in postgraduate year one to three who passed the screening test. Each resident performed intubation with video laryngoscopy using the four approaches in a randomized sequence on an adult manikin during continuous chest compression. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success defined as starting ventilation within a one minute.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 260 endotracheal intubations conducted by 65 residents were randomized and analyzed with 65 procedures in each group. First-attempt success occurred in 64 (98.5%), 57 (87.7%), 56 (86.2%), and 46 (70.8%) intubations in the bougie-first, preloaded bougie, ETT with stylet, and ETT without stylet approaches, respectively. The bougie-first approach had a significantly higher possibility of first-attempt success than the preloaded bougie approach [risk ratio (RR) 8.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 62.16, P = 0.047], the ETT with stylet approach (RR 9.00, 95% CI 1.17 to 69.02, P = 0.035), and the ETT without stylet approach (RR 19.00, 95% CI 2.62 to 137.79, P = 0.004) in the generalized estimating equation logistic model accounting for clustering of intubations operated by the same resident. In addition, the bougie first approach did not result in prolonged intubation or increased self-reported difficulty among the study participants.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The bougie first approach with video laryngoscopy had the highest possibility of first-attempt success during chest compression. These results helped inform the intubation approach during CPR. However, further studies in an actual clinical environment are warranted to validate these findings.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Clinicaltrials.gov; identifier: NCT05689125; date: January 18, 2023.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38773386
doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02560-3
pii: 10.1186/s12871-024-02560-3
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05689125']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 72304281
Organisme : National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding
ID : 2022-PUMCH-B-007
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Jabre P, Penaloza A, Pinero D, Duchateau FX, Borron SW, Javaudin F, Richard O, de Longueville D, Bouilleau G, Devaud ML, et al. Effect of bag-mask ventilation vs endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest: a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319(8):779–87.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0156
pubmed: 29486039
pmcid: 5838565
Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabanas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, Kudenchuk PJ, Kurz MC, Lavonas EJ, Morley PT, et al. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16suppl2):S366–468.
pubmed: 33081529
Maruyama K, Tsukamoto S, Ohno S, Kobayashi K, Nakagawa H, Kitamura A, Hayashida M. Effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope, the AirWay Scope, and the gum elastic bougie: a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2010;81(8):1014–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.03.041
pubmed: 20605669
Khandelwal N, Galgon RE, Ali M, Joffe AM. Cardiac arrest is a predictor of difficult tracheal intubation independent of operator experience in hospitalized patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:38.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-38
pubmed: 24904233
pmcid: 4046074
Andersen LW, Granfeldt A, Callaway CW, Bradley SM, Soar J, Nolan JP, Kurth T, Donnino MW. American Heart Association’s get with the guidelines-Resuscitation I: Association between Tracheal Intubation during Adult In-Hospital cardiac arrest and survival. JAMA. 2017;317(5):494–506.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20165
pubmed: 28118660
pmcid: 6056890
Okamoto H, Goto T, Wong ZSY, Hagiwara Y, Watase H, Hasegawa K. Japanese Emergency Medicine Network I: comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for intubation in emergency department patients with cardiac arrest: a multicentre study. Resuscitation. 2019;136:70–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.005
pubmed: 30385385
Park SO, Kim JW, Na JH, Lee KH, Lee KR, Hong DY, Baek KJ. Video laryngoscopy improves the first-attempt success in endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation among novice physicians. Resuscitation. 2015;89:188–94.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.12.010
pubmed: 25541427
Lee DH, Han M, An JY, Jung JY, Koh Y, Lim CM, Huh JW, Hong SB. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;89:195–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.030
pubmed: 25541431
Driver BE, Prekker ME, Klein LR, Reardon RF, Miner JR, Fagerstrom ET, Cleghorn MR, McGill JW, Cole JB. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success among patients with difficult airways undergoing emergency intubation: a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319(21):2179–89.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6496
pubmed: 29800096
pmcid: 6134434
Driver BE, Semler MW, Self WH, Ginde AA, Trent SA, Gandotra S, Smith LM, Page DB, Vonderhaar DJ, West JR, et al. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube with Stylet on successful intubation on the First Attempt among critically ill patients undergoing Tracheal Intubation: a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021;326(24):2488–97.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22002
pubmed: 34879143
Latimer AJ, Harrington B, Counts CR, Ruark K, Maynard C, Watase T, Sayre MR. Routine use of a Bougie improves First-Attempt Intubation Success in the out-of-hospital setting. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(3):296–304.
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.10.016
pubmed: 33342596
Jaber S, Rolle A, Godet T, Terzi N, Riu B, Asfar P, Bourenne J, Ramin S, Lemiale V, Quenot JP, et al. Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(6):653–64.
pubmed: 34032882
pmcid: 8144872
Baker JB, Maskell KF, Matlock AG, Walsh RM, Skinner CG. Comparison of preloaded Bougie versus Standard Bougie Technique for Endotracheal Intubation in a cadaveric model. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(4):588–93.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.4.22857
pubmed: 26265978
pmcid: 4530924
Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, Fiadjoe JE, Greif R, Klock PA, Mercier D, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(1):31–81.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002
pubmed: 34762729
Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, Mendonca C, Bhagrath R, Patel A, O’Sullivan EP, Woodall NM, Ahmad I. Difficult Airway Society intubation guidelines working g: Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(6):827–48.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aev371
pubmed: 26556848
pmcid: 4650961
Evrin T, Smereka J, Gorczyca D, Bialka S, Ladny JR, Katipoglu B, Szarpak L. Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial. Emerg Med Int 2019, 2019:7306204.
Komasawa N, Cho T, Mihara R, Minami T. Utility of gum-elastic bougie for tracheal intubation during chest compressions in a manikin: a randomized crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(1):54–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.09.016
pubmed: 26456492
Cho T, Komasawa N, Hattori K, Mihara R, Minami T. Gum-Elastic Bougie Efficacy for Tracheal Intubation during Continuous Chest Compression in Infants-A crossover Simulation Trial. J Emerg Med. 2016;51(1):19–24.
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.03.003
pubmed: 27133735
Amalric M, Larcher R, Brunot V, Garnier F, De Jong A, Moulaire Rigollet V, Corne P, Klouche K, Jung B. Impact of Videolaryngoscopy Expertise on First-Attempt Intubation Success in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(10):e889–96.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004497
pubmed: 32769622
Trimmel H, Kreutziger J, Fitzka R, Szuts S, Derdak C, Koch E, Erwied B, Voelckel WG. Use of the GlideScope Ranger Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in the Prehospital setting: a Randomized Control Trial. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(7):e470–476.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001669
pubmed: 27002277
Arima T, Nagata O, Miura T, Ikeda K, Mizushima T, Takahashi A, Sakaida K. Comparative analysis of airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation primarily for cardiac arrest in prehospital setting. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(1):40–3.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.09.026
pubmed: 24176585
Lascarrou JB, Boisrame-Helms J, Bailly A, Le Thuaut A, Kamel T, Mercier E, Ricard JD, Lemiale V, Colin G, Mira JP, et al. Video laryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy on successful first-pass Orotracheal Intubation among ICU patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317(5):483–93.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20603
pubmed: 28118659
Jiang J, Ma D, Li B, Yue Y, Xue F. Video laryngoscopy does not improve the intubation outcomes in emergency and critical patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):288.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1885-9
pubmed: 29178953
pmcid: 5702235
Xue FS, Yang BQ, Liu YY, Li HX, Yang GZ. Current evidences for the Use of UEscope in Airway Management. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130(15):1867–75.
doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.211536
pubmed: 28748861