Detection of differential bait proteoforms through immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry data analysis.


Journal

Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 May 2024
Historique:
received: 07 02 2024
accepted: 20 05 2024
medline: 30 5 2024
pubmed: 30 5 2024
entrez: 29 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Proteins are often referred to as the workhorses of cells, and their interactions are necessary to facilitate specific cellular functions. Despite the recognition that protein-protein interactions, and thus protein functions, are determined by proteoform states, such as mutations and post-translational modifications (PTMs), methods for determining the differential abundance of proteoforms across conditions are very limited. Classically, immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry (IP-MS) has been used to understand how the interactome (preys) of a given protein (bait) changes between conditions to elicit specific cellular functions. Reversing this concept, we present here a new workflow for IP-MS data analysis that focuses on identifying the differential peptidoforms of the bait protein between conditions. This method can provide detailed information about specific bait proteoforms, potentially revealing pathogenic protein states that can be exploited for the development of targeted therapies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38811611
doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03394-x
pii: 10.1038/s41597-024-03394-x
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Dataset

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

551

Subventions

Organisme : EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council)
ID : 852343

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Smith, L. M. et al. Proteoform: a single term describing protein complexity. Nat Methods 10, 186 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2369 pubmed: 23443629 pmcid: 4114032
Melani, R. D. et al. The Blood Proteoform Atlas: A reference map of proteoforms in human hematopoietic cells. Science (1979) 375, 411–418 (2022).
Toby, T. K. et al. Proteoforms in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells as Novel Rejection Biomarkers in Liver Transplant Recipients. Am J Transplant 17, 2458 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/ajt.14359 pubmed: 28510335 pmcid: 5612406
Demeulemeester, N. et al. msqrob2PTM: differential abundance and differential usage analysis of MS-based proteomics data at the post-translational modification and peptidoform level. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 100708, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MCPRO.2023.100708 (2023).
Trinkle-Mulcahy, L. et al. Identifying specific protein interaction partners using quantitative mass spectrometry and bead proteomes. J Cell Biol 183, 223 (2008).
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200805092 pubmed: 18936248 pmcid: 2568020
Yu, F. et al. Identification of modified peptides using localization-aware open search. Nature Communications 11, 1–9 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17921-y
Kong, A. T., Leprevost, F. V., Avtonomov, D. M., Mellacheruvu, D. & Nesvizhskii, A. I. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in shotgun proteomics. Nat Methods 14, 513 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4256 pubmed: 28394336 pmcid: 5409104
Teo, G. et al. SAINTexpress: improvements and additional features in Significance Analysis of Interactome software. J Proteomics 100, 37 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.10.023 pubmed: 24513533
Adams, C., Boonen, K., Laukens, K. & Bittremieux, W. Open Modification Searching of SARS-CoV-2–Human Protein Interaction Data Reveals Novel Viral Modification Sites. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 21, (2022).
Kandoth, C. et al. Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature 502, 333–339 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nature12634 pubmed: 24132290 pmcid: 3927368
Rhyasen, G. W. et al. BRD4 amplification facilitates an oncogenic gene expression program in high-grade serous ovarian cancer and confers sensitivity to BET inhibitors. PLoS One 13, (2018).
White, M. A. et al. Multiple Ras functions can contribute to mammalian cell transformation. Cell 80, 533–541 (1995).
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90507-3 pubmed: 7867061
Lanman, B. A. et al. Discovery of a Covalent Inhibitor of KRASG12C (AMG 510) for the Treatment of Solid Tumors. J Med Chem 63, 52–65 (2020).
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01180 pubmed: 31820981
Nakajima, E. C. et al. FDA Approval Summary: Sotorasib for KRAS G12C-Mutated Metastatic NSCLC. Clinical Cancer Research 28, 1482–1486 (2022).
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3074 pubmed: 34903582 pmcid: 9012672
Huang, L., Carney, J., Cardona, D. M. & Counter, C. M. Decreased tumorigenesis in mice with a Kras point mutation at C118. Nature Communications 5, 1–10 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms6410
Filippakopoulos, P. et al. Histone recognition and large-scale structural analysis of the human bromodomain family. Cell 149, 214–231 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.013 pubmed: 22464331 pmcid: 3326523
Swaney, D. L. et al. A protein network map of head and neck cancer reveals PIK3CA mutant drug sensitivity. Science 374, eabf2911 (2021).
doi: 10.1126/science.abf2911 pubmed: 34591642 pmcid: 9005332
Kourtis, S. Peptidoform analysis of IP-MS data allows detection of differentially present bait proteoforms. Preprint at, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11163748 (2024).
Salmón, M. et al. Kras oncogene ablation prevents resistance in advanced lung adenocarcinomas. J Clin Invest 133, (2023).
Nolan, A. et al. Proteomic Mapping of the Interactome of KRAS Mutants Identifies New Features of RAS Signalling Networks and the Mechanism of Action of Sotorasib. Cancers (Basel) 15, 4141–4141 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/cancers15164141 pubmed: 37627169
Kramer-Drauberg, M. & Ambrogio, C. Discoveries in the redox regulation of KRAS. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 131, 105901 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2020.105901 pubmed: 33309959
Boja, E. S. & Fales, H. M. Overalkylation of a protein digest with iodoacetamide. Anal Chem 73, 3576–3582 (2001).
doi: 10.1021/ac0103423 pubmed: 11510821
Geiszler, D. J. et al. PTM-Shepherd: Analysis and Summarization of Post-Translational and Chemical Modifications From Open Search Results. Mol Cell Proteomics 20, 100018 (2021).
doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR120.002216 pubmed: 33568339
Zhang, K., Li, Y., Huang, T. & Li, Z. Potential application of TurboID-based proximity labeling in studying the protein interaction network in plant response to abiotic stress. Front Plant Sci 13, 974598 (2022).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.974598 pubmed: 36051300 pmcid: 9426856
Sharifi Tabar, M. et al. Illuminating the dark protein-protein interactome. Cell Reports Methods 2, 100275 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100275 pubmed: 36046620 pmcid: 9421580
Sdelci, S. et al. MTHFD1 interaction with BRD4 links folate metabolism to transcriptional regulation. Nat Genet 51, 990 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0413-z pubmed: 31133746 pmcid: 6952269
Hornbeck, P. V. et al. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D512–D520 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1267 pubmed: 25514926
Roux, K. J., Kim, D. I., Raida, M. & Burke, B. A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. Journal of Cell Biology 196, 801–810 (2012).
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201112098 pubmed: 22412018 pmcid: 3308701
Van Andel, E. et al. Highly Specific Protein Identification by Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry Using Antifouling Microbeads. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14, 23102–23116 (2022).
doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c22734 pubmed: 35536557 pmcid: 9136845
Sun, S., Zhou, J. Y., Yang, W. & Zhang, H. Inhibition of protein carbamylation in urea solution using ammonium-containing buffers. Anal Biochem 446, 76–81 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2013.10.024 pubmed: 24161613
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res 50, D543–D552 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038 pubmed: 34723319
Bateman, A. et al. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res 49, D480–D489 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100
Kolde, R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap (2019).
Land, H. & Humble, M. S. YASARA: A Tool to Obtain Structural Guidance in Biocatalytic Investigations. Methods Mol Biol 1685, 43–67 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7366-8_4 pubmed: 29086303
Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 235–242 (2000).
doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 pubmed: 10592235 pmcid: 102472
Delgado, J., Radusky, L. G., Cianferoni, D. & Serrano, L. FoldX 5.0: working with RNA, small molecules and a new graphical interface. Bioinformatics 35, 4168–4169 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz184 pubmed: 30874800 pmcid: 6792092

Auteurs

Savvas Kourtis (S)

Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain. savvas.kourtis@crg.eu.

Damiano Cianferoni (D)

Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.

Luis Serrano (L)

Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.

Sara Sdelci (S)

Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain. sara.sdelci@crg.eu.

Articles similaires

Humans Arthritis, Rheumatoid Lipid Metabolism Male Female
Protein Processing, Post-Translational Humans Blood Coagulation Fibrin Fibrinogen
Humans Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Schizophrenia Neural Stem Cells DNA Damage

Classifications MeSH