Chromosome-level genome assembly of Solanum pimpinellifolium.


Journal

Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 27 11 2023
accepted: 29 05 2024
medline: 5 6 2024
pubmed: 5 6 2024
entrez: 4 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Solanum pimpinellifolium, the closest wild relative of the domesticated tomato, has high potential for use in breeding programs aimed at developing multi-pathogen resistance and quality improvement. We generated a chromosome-level genome assembly of S. pimpinellifolium LA1589, with a size of 833 Mb and a contig N50 of 31 Mb. We anchored 98.80% of the contigs into 12 pseudo-chromosomes, and identified 74.47% of the sequences as repetitive sequences. The genome evaluation revealed BUSCO and LAI score of 98.3% and 14.49, respectively, indicating high quality of this assembly. A total of 41,449 protein-coding genes were predicted in the genome, of which 89.17% were functionally annotated. This high-quality genome assembly serves as a valuable resource for accelerating the biological discovery and molecular breeding of this important horticultural crop.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38834611
doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03442-6
pii: 10.1038/s41597-024-03442-6
doi:

Types de publication

Dataset Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

577

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 32000364
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation)
ID : ZR2020JQ12

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Giovannoni, J. J. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 16, S170–S180 (2004).
pubmed: 15010516 pmcid: 2643394 doi: 10.1105/tpc.019158
Arie, T., Takahashi, H., Kodama, M. & Teraoka, T. Tomato as a model plant for plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Biotechnol 24, 135–147 (2007).
doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.24.135
Lin, T. et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat Genet 46, 1220–1226 (2014).
pubmed: 25305757 doi: 10.1038/ng.3117
Schauer, N., Zamir, D. & Fernie, A. R. Metabolic profiling of leaves and fruit of wild species tomato: a survey of the Solanum lycopersicum complex. J Exp Bot 56, 297–307 (2005).
pubmed: 15596477 doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri057
Takei, H. et al. De novo genome assembly of two tomato ancestors, Solanum pimpinellifolium and Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme, by long-read sequencing. DNA Res 28, dsaa028 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsaa029
Hake, S. & Richardson, A. Using wild relatives to improve maize. Science 365, 640–641 (2019).
pubmed: 31416949 doi: 10.1126/science.aay5299
Strickler, S. R. et al. Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives. PeerJ 3, e793 (2015).
pubmed: 25780758 pmcid: 4358695 doi: 10.7717/peerj.793
Kapazoglou, A. et al. Crop wild relatives: a valuable source of tolerance to various abiotic stresses. Plants 12, 328 (2023).
pubmed: 36679041 pmcid: 9861506 doi: 10.3390/plants12020328
Anderson, T. A. et al. Detection of trait donors and QTL boundaries for early blight resistance using local ancestry inference in a library of genomic sequences for tomato. Plant J 117, 404–415 (2024).
pubmed: 37856521 doi: 10.1111/tpj.16495
Yang, H. et al. The Sm gene conferring resistance to gray leaf spot disease encodes an NBS-LRR (nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat) plant resistance protein in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 135, 1467–1476 (2022).
pubmed: 35165745 doi: 10.1007/s00122-022-04047-6
Ori, N. et al. The I2C family from the wilt disease resistance locus I2 belongs to the nucleotide binding, leucine-rich repeat superfamily of plant resistance genes. Plant Cell 9, 521–532 (1997).
pubmed: 9144960 pmcid: 156936
Robbins, M. D., Darrigues, A., Sim, S. C., Masud, M. A. & Francis, D. M. Characterization of hypersensitive resistance to bacterial spot race T3 (Xanthomonas perforans) from tomato accession PI 128216. Phytopathology 99, 1037–1044 (2009).
pubmed: 19671005 doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-9-1037
Zhang, C. et al. The Ph-3 gene from Solanum pimpinellifolium encodes CC-NBS-LRR protein conferring resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Theor Appl Genet 127, 1353–1364 (2014).
pubmed: 24756242 pmcid: 4035550 doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2303-1
Gladman, N., Goodwin, S., Chougule, K., Richard, M. W. & Ware, D. Era of gapless plant genomes: innovations in sequencing and mapping technologies revolutionize genomics and breeding. Curr Opin Biotechnol 79, 102886 (2023).
pubmed: 36640454 pmcid: 9899316 doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102886
Tian, T. et al. Genome assembly and genetic dissection of a prominent drought-resistant maize germplasm. Nat Genet 55, 496–506 (2023).
pubmed: 36806841 doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01297-y
Jiang, L. et al. Chromosome-scale genome assembly-assisted identification of Mi-9 gene in Solanum arcanum accession LA2157, conferring heat-stable resistance to Meloidogyne incognita. Plant Biotechnol J 21, 1496–1509 (2023).
pubmed: 37074757 pmcid: 10281608 doi: 10.1111/pbi.14055
Wang, X. et al. Genome of Solanum pimpinellifolium provides insights into structural variants during tomato breeding. Nat Commun 11, 5817 (2020).
pubmed: 33199703 pmcid: 7670462 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19682-0
Alonge, M. et al. RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes. Genome Biol 20, 224 (2019).
pubmed: 31661016 pmcid: 6816165 doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1829-6
Hosmani, P. S. et al. An improved de novo assembly and annotation of the tomato reference genome using single-molecule sequencing, Hi-C proximity ligation and optical maps. bioRxiv, 767764 (2019).
Su, X. et al. A high-continuity and annotated tomato reference genome. BMC Genomics 22, 898 (2021).
pubmed: 34911432 pmcid: 8672587 doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08212-x
Bolger, A. et al. The genome of the stress-tolerant wild tomato species Solanum pennellii. Nat Genet 46, 1034–1038 (2014).
pubmed: 25064008 pmcid: 7036041 doi: 10.1038/ng.3046
Li, N. et al. Super-pangenome analyses highlight genomic diversity and structural variation across wild and cultivated tomato species. Nat Genet 55, 852–860 (2023).
pubmed: 37024581 pmcid: 10181942 doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01340-y
Frary, A. et al. Development of a set of PCR-based anchor markers encompassing the tomato genome and evaluation of their usefulness for genetics and breeding experiments. Theor Appl Genet 111, 291–312 (2005).
pubmed: 15926074 doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-2023-7
Doganlar, S., Frary, A., Ku, H. M. & Tanksley, S. D. Mapping quantitative trait loci in inbred backcross lines of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (LA1589). Genome 45, 1189–1202 (2002).
pubmed: 12502266 doi: 10.1139/g02-091
Colak, N. G., Eken, N. T., Ulger, M., Frary, A. & Doganlar, S. Exploring wild alleles from Solanum pimpinellifolium with the potential to improve tomato flavor compounds. Plant Sci 298, 110567 (2020).
pubmed: 32771168 doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110567
Van Der Knaap, E., Lippman, Z. B. & Tanksley, S. D. Extremely elongated tomato fruit controlled by four quantitative trait loci with epistatic interactions. Theor Appl Genet 104, 241–247 (2002).
pubmed: 12582693 doi: 10.1007/s00122-001-0776-1
Liu, J. et al. A natural variation in SlSCaBP8 promoter contributes to the loss of saline-alkaline tolerance during tomato improvement. Hortic Res 11, uhae055 (2024).
pubmed: 38659442 pmcid: 11040208 doi: 10.1093/hr/uhae055
The Tomato Genome Consortium. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485, 635–641 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nature11119
Inglis, P. W., Pappas, M., Resende, L. V. & Grattapaglia, D. Fast and inexpensive protocols for consistent extraction of high quality DNA and RNA from challenging plant and fungal samples for high-throughput SNP genotyping and sequencing applications. PLoS One 13, e0206085 (2018).
pubmed: 30335843 pmcid: 6193717 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206085
Marcais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27, 764–770 (2011).
pubmed: 21217122 pmcid: 3051319 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011
Vurture, G. W. et al. GenomeScope: fast reference-free genome profiling from short reads. Bioinformatics 33, 2202–2204 (2017).
pubmed: 28369201 pmcid: 5870704 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx153
Koren, S. et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27, 722–736 (2017).
pubmed: 28298431 pmcid: 5411767 doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116
Du, H. & Liang, C. Assembly of chromosome-scale contigs by efficiently resolving repetitive sequences with long reads. Nat Commun 10, 5360 (2019).
pubmed: 31767853 pmcid: 6877557 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13355-3
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
pubmed: 22388286 pmcid: 3322381 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
Servant, N. et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biol 16, 259 (2015).
pubmed: 26619908 pmcid: 4665391 doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0831-x
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Syst 3, 99–101 (2016).
pubmed: 27467250 pmcid: 5596920 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.07.012
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
pubmed: 19451168 pmcid: 2705234 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9, e112963 (2014).
pubmed: 25409509 pmcid: 4237348 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963
Seppey, M., Manni, M. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Methods Mol Biol 1962, 227–245 (2019).
pubmed: 31020564 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_14
Ou, S., Chen, J. & Jiang, N. Assessing genome assembly quality using the LTR Assembly Index (LAI). Nucleic Acids Res 46, e126 (2018).
pubmed: 30107434 pmcid: 6265445
Ou, S. & Jiang, N. LTR_retriever: A highly accurate and sensitive program for identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. Plant Physiol 176, 1410–1422 (2018).
pubmed: 29233850 doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01310
Ou, S. et al. Benchmarking transposable element annotation methods for creation of a streamlined, comprehensive pipeline. Genome Biol 20, 275 (2019).
pubmed: 31843001 pmcid: 6913007 doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1905-y
Wenke, T. et al. Targeted identification of short interspersed nuclear element families shows their widespread existence and extreme heterogeneity in plant genomes. Plant Cell 23, 3117–3128 (2011).
pubmed: 21908723 pmcid: 3203444 doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.088682
Tarailo-Graovac, M. & Chen, N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 25, 4.10.11–4.10.14 (2009).
doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s25
Wang, Z. et al. A chromosome-level reference genome of Ensete glaucum gives insight into diversity and chromosomal and repetitive sequence evolution in the Musaceae. Gigascience 11, 1–21 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giac027
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
pubmed: 15034147 pmcid: 390337 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340
Campbell, M. S. et al. MAKER-P: a tool kit for the rapid creation, management, and quality control of plant genome annotations. Plant Physiol 164, 513–524 (2014).
pubmed: 24306534 doi: 10.1104/pp.113.230144
Korf, I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 1–19 (2004).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-59
Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res 34, W435–W439 (2006).
pubmed: 16845043 pmcid: 1538822 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200
Ghelfi, A., Shirasawa, K., Hirakawa, H. & Isobe, S. Hayai-Annotation Plants: an ultra-fast and comprehensive functional gene annotation system in plants. Bioinformatics 35, 4427–4429 (2019).
pubmed: 31093654 pmcid: 6821316 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz380
Bu, D. et al. KOBAS-i: intelligent prioritization and exploratory visualization of biological functions for gene enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 49, W317–W325 (2021).
pubmed: 34086934 pmcid: 8265193 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab447
Mitchell, A. L. et al. InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 47, D351–D360 (2019).
pubmed: 30398656 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1100
Bairoch, A. & Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 45–48 (2000).
pubmed: 10592178 pmcid: 102476 doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.45
Wang, Y. et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res 40, e49 (2012).
pubmed: 22217600 pmcid: 3326336 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1293
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J. & Roos, D. S. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 13, 2178–2189 (2003).
pubmed: 12952885 pmcid: 403725 doi: 10.1101/gr.1224503
Chan, P. P., Lin, B. Y., Mak, A. J. & Lowe, T. M. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 49, 9077–9096 (2021).
pubmed: 34417604 pmcid: 8450103 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab688
Lagesen, K. et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35, 3100–3108 (2007).
pubmed: 17452365 pmcid: 1888812 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160
Nawrocki, E. P. & Eddy, S. R. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29, 2933–2935 (2013).
pubmed: 24008419 pmcid: 3810854 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509
Kalvari, I. et al. Rfam 14: expanded coverage of metagenomic, viral and microRNA families. Nucleic Acids Res 49, D192–D200 (2021).
pubmed: 33211869 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1047
NCBI Sequence Read Archive, https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRP471177 (2023).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA012446 (2023).
NCBI GenBank, https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.gca:GCA_034621305.1 (2023).
Han, H. Y. Chromosome-level genome assembly of Solanum pimpinellifolium. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24605586 (2023).

Auteurs

Hongyu Han (H)

College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Taishan Academy of Tomato Innovation, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.

Xiuhong Li (X)

College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.

Tianze Li (T)

College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.

Qian Chen (Q)

Taishan Academy of Tomato Innovation, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.

Jiuhai Zhao (J)

College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
State Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China.
Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China.

Huawei Zhai (H)

Taishan Academy of Tomato Innovation, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.

Lei Deng (L)

Taishan Academy of Tomato Innovation, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.

Xianwen Meng (X)

Taishan Academy of Tomato Innovation, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. xwmeng@sdau.edu.cn.
College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. xwmeng@sdau.edu.cn.

Chuanyou Li (C)

Taishan Academy of Tomato Innovation, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. cyli@genetics.ac.cn.
College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. cyli@genetics.ac.cn.

Articles similaires

Genome Size Genome, Plant Magnoliopsida Evolution, Molecular Arabidopsis
Genome, Plant Medicago sativa Crops, Agricultural Genomics Polyploidy

Fine mapping of a major QTL, qECQ8, for rice taste quality.

Shan Zhu, Guoping Tang, Zhou Yang et al.
1.00
Oryza Quantitative Trait Loci Taste Chromosome Mapping Phenotype
Arabidopsis Amorphophallus Plants, Genetically Modified Phylogeny Droughts

Classifications MeSH