Application of the process-based teaching based on SPARK case database in the practice teaching of radiology in the musculoskeletal system for undergraduate medical students.
Medical education
SPARK case database
Teaching of radiology
The musculoskeletal system
The process-based teaching
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jun 2024
22 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
26
02
2024
accepted:
18
06
2024
medline:
23
6
2024
pubmed:
23
6
2024
entrez:
22
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Process-based teaching is a new education model. SPARK case database is a free medical imaging case database. This manuscript aimed to explore the application of the process-based teaching based on SPARK case database in the practice teaching of radiology in the musculoskeletal system. 117 third year medical students were included. They were divided into Group A, B, C and D according to the curriculum arrangement. Group A and B attended the experimental class at the same time, A was the experimental group, B was the control group. Group C and D attended experimental classes at the same time, C was the experimental group, D was the control group. The experimental group used SPARK case database, while the control group used traditional teaching model for learning. The four groups of students were respectively tested after the theoretical class, before the experimental class, after the experimental class, and one week after the experimental class to compare the results. Finally, all students used SPARK case database to study, and were tested one month after the experimental class to compare their differences. The scores after the theoretical class of Group A and B were (100.0 ± 25.4), (101.0 ± 23.8)(t=-0.160, P > 0.05), Group C and D were (94.7 ± 23.7), (92.1 ± 18.6)(t = 0.467, P > 0.05). The scores of Group A and B before and after the experimental class and one week after the experimental class were respectively (84.1 ± 17.4), (72.1 ± 21.3)(t = 2.363, P < 0.05), (107.6 ± 14.3), (102.1 ± 18.0)(t = 1.292, P > 0.05), (89.7 ± 24.3), (66.6 ± 23.2)(t = 3.706, P < 0.05). The scores of Group C and D were (94.0 ± 17.3), (72.8 ± 25.5)(t = 3.755, P < 0.05), (107.3 ± 20.3), (93.1 ± 20.9)(t = 2.652, P < 0.05), (100.3 ± 19.7), (77.2 ± 24.0)(t = 4.039, P < 0.05). The scores of Group A and B for one month after the experimental class were (86.6 ± 28.8), (84.5 ± 24.0)(t = 0.297, P > 0.05), and Group C and D were (95.7 ± 20.3), (91.7 ± 23.0)(t = 0.699, P > 0.05). The process-based teaching based on SPARK case database could improve the radiology practice ability of the musculoskeletal system of students.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Process-based teaching is a new education model. SPARK case database is a free medical imaging case database. This manuscript aimed to explore the application of the process-based teaching based on SPARK case database in the practice teaching of radiology in the musculoskeletal system.
METHODS
METHODS
117 third year medical students were included. They were divided into Group A, B, C and D according to the curriculum arrangement. Group A and B attended the experimental class at the same time, A was the experimental group, B was the control group. Group C and D attended experimental classes at the same time, C was the experimental group, D was the control group. The experimental group used SPARK case database, while the control group used traditional teaching model for learning. The four groups of students were respectively tested after the theoretical class, before the experimental class, after the experimental class, and one week after the experimental class to compare the results. Finally, all students used SPARK case database to study, and were tested one month after the experimental class to compare their differences.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The scores after the theoretical class of Group A and B were (100.0 ± 25.4), (101.0 ± 23.8)(t=-0.160, P > 0.05), Group C and D were (94.7 ± 23.7), (92.1 ± 18.6)(t = 0.467, P > 0.05). The scores of Group A and B before and after the experimental class and one week after the experimental class were respectively (84.1 ± 17.4), (72.1 ± 21.3)(t = 2.363, P < 0.05), (107.6 ± 14.3), (102.1 ± 18.0)(t = 1.292, P > 0.05), (89.7 ± 24.3), (66.6 ± 23.2)(t = 3.706, P < 0.05). The scores of Group C and D were (94.0 ± 17.3), (72.8 ± 25.5)(t = 3.755, P < 0.05), (107.3 ± 20.3), (93.1 ± 20.9)(t = 2.652, P < 0.05), (100.3 ± 19.7), (77.2 ± 24.0)(t = 4.039, P < 0.05). The scores of Group A and B for one month after the experimental class were (86.6 ± 28.8), (84.5 ± 24.0)(t = 0.297, P > 0.05), and Group C and D were (95.7 ± 20.3), (91.7 ± 23.0)(t = 0.699, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The process-based teaching based on SPARK case database could improve the radiology practice ability of the musculoskeletal system of students.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38909213
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05672-z
pii: 10.1186/s12909-024-05672-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
688Subventions
Organisme : Hangzhou Science and Technology Bureau
ID : 2021WJCY025
Organisme : Hangzhou Science and Technology Bureau
ID : 2022WJC002
Organisme : Ministry of Education Science and Technology lndustry-University Cooperation and Education Project
ID : 220606617205729
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Su H. An Innovation Research on the Foreign Language Teaching Theory with Chinese characteristics based on Whitehead’s process Philosophy[J]. Asian J Second Foreign Lang Educ. 2021;6(1):18.
doi: 10.1186/s40862-021-00123-4
Whitehead AN. The aims of education and other essays. The Free; 1967. pp. 4–98.
Munshi F, Alsughayyer A, Alhaidar S, Alarfaj M. An online clinical examination for fellowship certification during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med Educ. 2020;54(10):954–5.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14267
Blonder R, Feldman-Maggor Y, Rap S. What can be learned from lecturers’ knowledge and self-efficacy for online teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic to promote online teaching in higher education. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(10):e0275459.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275459
Ng TK, Chu K, Reynolds R, Chan HMY, Li XH. Business (teaching) as Usual amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study of online teaching practice in Hong Kong[J]. J Inform Technol Education: Res. 2020;19:775–802.
Barnes JH, Choby G, Smith AJ, et al. Creation of a new educational podcast: Headmirror’s ENT in a nutshell [J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163(4):623–5.
doi: 10.1177/0194599820930662
Bao W. COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: a case study of Peking University[J]. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020;2(2):113–5.
doi: 10.1002/hbe2.191
Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, et al. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis[J]. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181–96.
doi: 10.1001/jama.300.10.1181
Li Y, Gao C, Zhu X, Zhu J, Ding Z, Han Z. Application of SPARK teaching in acute abdomen radiography teaching for undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):881.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03957-9
Barone S, McGeechan S, Samuels R. COVID disruption: the use of core EPAs to shape paediatric intern orientation. Med Educ. 2022;56(11):1140–1.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14894
Jansen RS. Time to reflect: how has COVID-19 transformed you? A commentary. Med Educ. 2022;56(8):782–4.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14843
Dedeilia A, Sotiropoulos MG, Hanrahan JG, Janga D, Dedeilias P, Sideris M. Medical and surgical education challenges and innovations in the COVID-19 era: a systematic review. Vivo. 2020;34(3 Suppl):1603–11.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.11950
Murdock HM, Penner JC, Le S, Nematollahi S. Virtual Morning Report during COVID-19: A novel model for case-based teaching conferences. Med Educ. 2020,54(9):851-2.
Gaber DA, Shehata MH, Amin HAA. Online team-based learning sessions as interactive methodologies during the pandemic. Med Educ. 2020;54(7):666–7.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14198
Chen KS, Monrouxe L, Lu YH, Jenq CC, Chang YJ, Chang YC, Chai PY. Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2018;52(9):910–24.
doi: 10.1111/medu.13616
Tang F, Chen C, Zhu Y, Zuo C, Zhong Y, Wang N, Zhou L, Zou Y, Liang D. Comparison between flipped classroom and lecture-based classroom in ophthalmology clerkship. Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1395679.
doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1395679
Dubey S, Dubey AK. Promotion of higher order of cognition in undergraduate medical students using case-based approach. J Educ Health Promot. 2017;6:75.
doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_39_17
Trullàs JC, Blay C, Sarri E, Pujol R. Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):104.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03154-8
Dolmans D, Michaelsen L, van Merriënboer J, van der Vleuten C. Should we choose between problem-based learning and team-based learning? No, combine the best of both worlds! Med Teach. 2015;37(4):354–9.
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.948828
Liu Y, Xu Y, Li Y, Wu Q. Application of problem-based learning and case-based learning integrated method in the teaching of maxillary sinus floor augmentation in implant dentistry. PeerJ. 2020;8:e8353.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.8353
Antonis K, Lampsas P, Katsenos I, Papadakis S, Stamouli SM. Flipped classroom with teams-based learning in emergency higher education: methodology and results. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;4:1–17.
Lin CJ, Hwang GJ. A learning analytics approach to investigating factors affecting EFL students’ oral performance in a flipped classroom[J]. Educational Technol Soc. 2018;21:205–19.
Akcayir G, Akcayir M. The flipped classroom: a review of its advantages and challenges[J]. Comput Educ. 2018;126:334–45.
doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
Rotellar C, Cain J. Research, perspectives, and recommendations on implementing the flipped Classroom. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016;80(2):34.
doi: 10.5688/ajpe80234