Short-term adaptation as a tool to improve bioethanol production using grass press-juice as fermentation medium.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Bioethanol
Fermentation
Lignocellulosic biomass
Short-term adaptation
Journal
Applied microbiology and biotechnology
ISSN: 1432-0614
Titre abrégé: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8406612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jun 2024
25 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
20
03
2024
accepted:
04
06
2024
revised:
03
06
2024
medline:
25
6
2024
pubmed:
25
6
2024
entrez:
25
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Grass raw materials collected from grasslands cover more than 30% of Europe's agricultural area. They are considered very attractive for the production of different biochemicals and biofuels due to their high availability and renewability. In this study, a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) was exploited for second-generation bioethanol production. Grass press-cake and grass press-juice were separated using mechanical pretreatment, and the obtained juice was used as a fermentation medium. In this work, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was utilized for bioethanol production using the grass press-juice as the sole fermentation medium. The yeast was able to release about 11 g/L of ethanol in 72 h, with a total production yield of 0.38 ± 0.2 g
Identifiants
pubmed: 38916650
doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13224-0
pii: 10.1007/s00253-024-13224-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ethanol
3K9958V90M
Biofuels
0
Culture Media
0
Fructose
30237-26-4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
393Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft
ID : 220NR026B
Organisme : Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe
ID : 220NR026B
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Almeida JRM, Wiman M, Heer D, Brink DP, Sauer U, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF (2023) Physiological and molecular characterization of yeast cultures pre-adapted for fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysate. Fermentation 9:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9010072
doi: 10.3390/fermentation9010072
Ask M (2013) Towards more robust Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for lignocellulosic bioethanol production: lessons from process concepts and physiological investigations. Chalmers University of Technology
Ask M, Olofsson K, Di Felice T, Ruohonen L, Penttilä M, Lidén G, Olsson L (2012) Challenges in enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated Arundo donax revealed by a comparison between SHF and SSF. Process Biochem 47:1452–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2012.05.016
doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2012.05.016
Bautista K, Unpaprom Y, Junluthin P, Ramaraj R (2022) Ethanol production from corn stalk juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized yeast using a green method. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02261-8
doi: 10.1007/s13399-021-02261-8
Berthels NJ, Cordero Otero RR, Bauer FF, Thevelein JM, Pretorius IS (2004) Discrepancy in glucose and fructose utilisation during fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains. FEMS Yeast Res 4:683–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.02.005
doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.02.005
pubmed: 15093771
Berthels NJ, Cordero Otero RR, Bauer FF, Pretorius IS, Thevelein JM (2008) Correlation between glucose/fructose discrepancy and hexokinase kinetic properties in different Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77:1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1231-2
doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1231-2
pubmed: 17955190
Boakye-Boaten NA, Xiu S, Shahbazi A, Wang L, Li R, Schimmel K (2016) Uses of miscanthus press-juice within a green biorefinery platform. Bioresour Technol 207:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2016.02.030
doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2016.02.030
pubmed: 26896712
Cao W, Liu R (2013) Screening and optimization of trace elements supplement in sweet sorghum juice for ethanol production. Biomass Bioenerg 50:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.016
doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.016
Cherubini F, Jungmeier G, Wellisch M, Willke T, Skiadas I, van Ree R, de Jong E (2009) Towards a common classification approach for biorefinery systems. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefining 3:534–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.172
Damborg VK, Jensen SK, Weisbjerg MR, Adamsen AP, Stødkilde L (2020) Screw-pressed fractions from green forages as animal feed: chemical composition and mass balances. Anim Feed Sci Technol 261:114401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114401
doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114401
Dobrescu AC, Veras HCT, Varrone C, Knudsen JD (2021) Novel propagation strategy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced xylose metabolism during fermentation on softwood hydrolysate. Fermentation 7:288. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040288
European Parliament (2018) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. In: Off J Eur Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2018.328.01.0082.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2018:328:TOC . Accessed 25 Apr 2024
Gomez-Flores R, Thiruvengadathan TN, Nicol R, Gilroyed B, Morrison M, Reid LM, Margaritis A (2018) Bioethanol and biobutanol production from sugarcorn juice. Biomass Bioenerg 108:455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.038
doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.038
Gu H, Zhang J, Bao J (2014) Inhibitor analysis and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for simultaneous saccharification and ethanol fermentation from industrial waste corncob residues. Bioresour Technol 157:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.060
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.060
pubmed: 24518544
Guillaume C, Delobel P, Sablayrolles JM, Blondin B (2007) Molecular basis of fructose utilization by the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a mutated HXT3 allele enhances fructose fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:2432–2439. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02269-06
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02269-06
pubmed: 17308189
pmcid: 1855598
International Energy Agency (2020) European Union 2020: Energy Policy Review. In: IEA energy policy Rep. https://www.iea.org/reports/european-union-2020 . Accessed 25 Apr 2024
Kamm B, Schönicke P, Hille C (2016) Green biorefinery - industrial implementation. Food Chem 197:1341–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.088
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.088
pubmed: 26675876
Klimacek M, Kirl E, Krahulec S, Longus K, Novy V, Nidetzky B (2014) Stepwise metabolic adaption from pure metabolization to balanced anaerobic growth on xylose explored for recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact 13:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-37
doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-37
Kongkeitkajorn MB, Yaemdeeka R, Chaiyota I, Hamsupo K, Oraintara A, Reungsang A (2021) Bioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production. Energy Convers Manag X 12:100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100143
doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100143
Kongkeitkajorn MB, Sae-Kuay C, Reungsang A (2020) Evaluation of napier grass for bioethanol production through a fermentation process. Processes 8:567. https://doi.org/10.3390/PR8050567
Lange HC, Heijnen JJ (2001) Statistical reconciliation of the elemental and molecular biomass composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 75:334–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10054
doi: 10.1002/bit.10054
pubmed: 11590606
Meijer MMC, Boonstra J, Verkleij AJ, Verrips CT (1998) Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is related to the glucose concentration rather than the glucose flux. J Biol Chem 273:24102–24107. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.37.24102
doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.37.24102
pubmed: 9727030
Nielsen F, Tomás-Pejó E, Olsson L, Wallberg O (2015) Short-term adaptation during propagation improves the performance of xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae in simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0399-4
doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0399-4
Nielsen F (2016) Process development for combined pentose and hexose fermentation. Dissertation, Lund University. https://www.portal.research.lu.se/en/publications/process-development-for-combined-pentose-and-hexose-fermentation
Novy V, Wang R, Westman JO, Franzén CJ, Nidetzky B (2017) Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain comparison in glucose-xylose fermentations on defined substrates and in high-gravity SSCF: convergence in strain performance despite differences in genetic and evolutionary engineering history. Biotechnol Biofuels 10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0887-9
doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0887-9
OECD/FAO (2021) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021–2030. In: OECD-FAO Agric. Outlook 2021–2030. https://www.fao.org/common-pages/search/en/?q=OECD-FAO+Agricultural+Outlook+2021-2030 . Accessed 25 Apr 2024
Prasertwasu S, Khumsupan D, Komolwanich T, Chaisuwan T, Luengnaruemitchai A, Wongkasemjit S (2014) Efficient process for ethanol production from Thai Mission grass (Pennisetum polystachion). Bioresour Technol 163:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2014.04.043
doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2014.04.043
pubmed: 24811442
Putra MD, Sulieman AK, Abasaeed AE, Gaily MH, Al-Zahrani SM, Zeinelabdeen MA, Atiyeh HK (2017) A green process for simultaneous production of fructose and ethanol via selective fermentation. J Clean Prod 162:420–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.069
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.069
Rojas P, Lopez D, Ibañez F, Urbina C, Franco W, Urtubia A, Valencia P (2021) Recycling and conversion of yeasts into organic nitrogen sources for wine fermentation: effects on molecular and sensory attributes. Fermentation 7:313. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040313
Sharma B, Larroche C, Dussap CG (2020) Comprehensive assessment of 2G bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol 313:123630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123630
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123630
pubmed: 32561105
Sieker T, Neuner A, Dimitrova D, Tippkötter N, Muffler K, Bart HJ, Heinzle E, Ulber R (2011) Ethanol production from grass silage by simultaneous pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation: first steps in the process development. Eng Life Sci 11:436–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201000160
doi: 10.1002/elsc.201000160
Sipos B, Réczey J, Somorai Z, Kádár Z, Dienes D, Réczey K (2009) Sweet sorghum as feedstock for ethanol production: enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated bagasse. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 153:151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8423-9
doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8423-9
pubmed: 19015818
Takagi H (2019) Metabolic regulatory mechanisms and physiological roles of functional amino acids and their applications in yeast. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 83:1449–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09168451.2019.1576500
doi: 10.1080/09168451.2019.1576500
pubmed: 30712454
Takara D, Khanal SK (2015) Characterizing compositional changes of Napier grass at different stages of growth for biofuel and biobased products potential. Bioresour Technol 188:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.114
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.114
pubmed: 25727997
Tan JS, Phapugrangkul P, Lee CK, Lai ZW, Abu Bakar MH, Murugan P (2019) Banana frond juice as novel fermentation substrate for bioethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 21:101293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101293
doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101293
Taufikurahman SJ, Delimanto WO (2020) Production of bioethanol from Napier grass: comparison in pre-treatment and fermentation methods. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 520:012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/520/1/012005
Tomás-Pejó E, Olsson L (2015) Influence of the propagation strategy for obtaining robust Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells that efficiently co-ferment xylose and glucose in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Microb Biotechnol 8:999–1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12280
doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12280
pubmed: 25989314
pmcid: 4621452
Tomé D (2021) Yeast extracts: nutritional and flavoring food ingredients. ACS Food Sci Technol 1:487–494. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.0c00131
doi: 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.0c00131
Tronchoni J, Gamero A, Arroyo-López FN, Barrio E, Querol A (2009) Differences in the glucose and fructose consumption profiles in diverse Saccharomyces wine species and their hybrids during grape juice fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 134:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.07.004
doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.07.004
pubmed: 19632733
Tsai MH, Lee WC, Kuan WC, Sirisansaneeyakul S, Savarajara (Akaracharanya) A (2018) Evaluation of different pretreatments of Napier grass for enzymatic saccharification and ethanol production. Energy Sci Eng 6:683–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.243
doi: 10.1002/ese3.243
Tse TJ, Wiens DJ, Reaney MJT (2021) Production of bioethanol—a review of factors affecting ethanol yield. Fermentation 7:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040268
doi: 10.3390/fermentation7040268
van Dijk M, Mierke F, Nygård Y, Olsson L (2020) Nutrient-supplemented propagation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves its lignocellulose fermentation ability. AMB Express 10:157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01070-y
Varriale L, Volkmar M, Weiermüller J, Ulber R (2022) Effects of pretreatment on the biocatalysis of renewable resources. Chem-Ing-Tech 94:1818–1826. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.202200137
doi: 10.1002/cite.202200137
Volkmar M, Maus AL, Weisbrodt M, Bohlender J, Langsdorf A, Holtmann D, Ulber R (2023) Municipal green waste as substrate for the microbial production of platform chemicals. Bioresour Bioprocess 10:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-023-00663-2
Wallace-Salinas V, Gorwa-Grauslund MF (2013) Adaptive evolution of an industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for combined tolerance to inhibitors and temperature. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-151
doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-151
Wang G, Li Q, Zhang Z, Yin X, Wang B, Yang X (2023) Recent progress in adaptive laboratory evolution of industrial microorganisms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 50:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/jimb/kuac023
doi: 10.1093/jimb/kuac023
Zhang S, Zeng X, Ren M, Mao X, Qiao S (2017) Novel metabolic and physiological functions of branched chain amino acids: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 8:4–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-016-0139-z
doi: 10.1186/s40104-016-0139-z