Analysis of cardiac arrest after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Cardiac arrest
General ward
Prognosis
Resuscitation
Shockable rhythm
Journal
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery
ISSN: 1749-8090
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265113
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jul 2024
16 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
08
05
2024
accepted:
30
06
2024
medline:
17
7
2024
pubmed:
17
7
2024
entrez:
16
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiac arrest after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a serious complication with low survival rate. The prognosis of patients with cardiac arrest in the general ward is worse than that in the intensive care unit (ICU) because of the delayed and poor rescue conditions. This retrospective study included patients who experienced cardiac arrest after CABG surgery between January 2010 and December 2019 at the Fuwai Hospital. Differences in cardiac arrest between the ICU and the general ward were compared. The patients were divided into shockable and non-shockable rhythm groups, and the differences between the two groups were compared. Finally, we proposed a management protocol for cardiac arrest in the general ward. We retrospectively analyzed 41,450 patients who underwent CABG only, of whom 231 (0.56%) experienced cardiac arrest post-surgery in the ICU (185/231) or in the general ward (46/231). The rescue success rate and 30-day survival rate of the patients with cardiac arrest in the general ward were 76.1% (35/46) and 58.7% (27/46), respectively. The incidence of the different arrhythmia types of cardiac arrest in the general ward compared with that in the ICU was different (P = 0.010). The 30-day survival rate of the non-shockable rhythm group was 31.8% (7/22), which was worse than that of the shockable rhythm group (83.3% [20/24]; P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the prognosis of the non-shockable group was poor (P < 0.001). The incidence of cardiac arrest after CABG was low. The prognosis of patients in the general ward was worse than that of those in the ICU. The proportion of non-shockable rhythm type cardiac arrest was higher in the general ward than in the ICU, and patients in this group had a worse early prognosis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cardiac arrest after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a serious complication with low survival rate. The prognosis of patients with cardiac arrest in the general ward is worse than that in the intensive care unit (ICU) because of the delayed and poor rescue conditions.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective study included patients who experienced cardiac arrest after CABG surgery between January 2010 and December 2019 at the Fuwai Hospital. Differences in cardiac arrest between the ICU and the general ward were compared. The patients were divided into shockable and non-shockable rhythm groups, and the differences between the two groups were compared. Finally, we proposed a management protocol for cardiac arrest in the general ward.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We retrospectively analyzed 41,450 patients who underwent CABG only, of whom 231 (0.56%) experienced cardiac arrest post-surgery in the ICU (185/231) or in the general ward (46/231). The rescue success rate and 30-day survival rate of the patients with cardiac arrest in the general ward were 76.1% (35/46) and 58.7% (27/46), respectively. The incidence of the different arrhythmia types of cardiac arrest in the general ward compared with that in the ICU was different (P = 0.010). The 30-day survival rate of the non-shockable rhythm group was 31.8% (7/22), which was worse than that of the shockable rhythm group (83.3% [20/24]; P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the prognosis of the non-shockable group was poor (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of cardiac arrest after CABG was low. The prognosis of patients in the general ward was worse than that of those in the ICU. The proportion of non-shockable rhythm type cardiac arrest was higher in the general ward than in the ICU, and patients in this group had a worse early prognosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39014489
doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02963-w
pii: 10.1186/s13019-024-02963-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
451Subventions
Organisme : National Key Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
ID : 2018YFC1311200
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Windecker S, Neumann FJ, Juni P, et al. Considerations for the choice between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention as revascularization strategies in major categories of patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease: an accompanying article of the task force of the 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:204–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy532 .
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy532
pubmed: 30165435
Head SJ, Kieser TM, Falk V, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting: part 1–the evolution over the first 50 years. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2862–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht330 .
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht330
pubmed: 24086085
Mir Mohammad Sadeghi P, Mir Mohammad Sadeghi M. Cardiopulmonary arrest after cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort of 142 patients with nine year follow up. Heart Lung. 2021;50:382–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.01.018 .
doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.01.018
pubmed: 33621835
Adam Z, Adam S, Everngam RL, et al. Resuscitation after cardiac surgery: results of an international survey. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.050 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.050
pubmed: 19369089
Ley SJ. Cardiac surgical resuscitation: state of the science. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2019;31:437–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2019.05.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2019.05.010
pubmed: 31351560
Marler GS, Molloy MA, Engel JR, et al. Implementing cardiac surgical unit-advanced life support through simulation-based learning: a quality improvement project. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2020;39:180–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000425 .
doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000425
pubmed: 32467400
Lees NJ, Powell SJ, Mackay JH. Six-year prospective audit of ‘scoop and run’ for chest-reopening after cardiac arrest in a cardiac surgical ward setting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15:816–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs343 .
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs343
pubmed: 22879359
pmcid: 3480611
DiLibero J, Misto K. Outcomes of In-hospital Cardiac arrest: a review of the evidence. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2021;33(3):343–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2021.05.009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2021.05.009
pubmed: 34340795
Lott C, Truhlář A, Alfonzo A, et al. European Resuscitation Council guidelines 2021: cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2021;161:152–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.011 .
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.011
pubmed: 33773826
Pottle A, Bullock I, Thomas J, et al. Survival to discharge following open chest cardiac compression (OCCC). A 4-year retrospective audit in a cardiothoracic specialist centre–royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, United Kingdom. Resuscitation. 2002;52:269–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00479-8 .
doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00479-8
pubmed: 11886732
Society of Thoracic Surgeons Task Force on Resuscitation After Cardiac Surgery. The society of thoracic surgeons expert consensus for the resuscitation of patients who arrest after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1005–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.033 .
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.033
Panchal AR, Berg KM, Hirsch KG, American Heart Association Focused Update on Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support. Use of advanced airways, vasopressors, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiac arrest: an update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2019;140:e881-e94. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000732 .
Stewart C, Chan PS, Kennedy K, et al. American Heart Association’s get with the guidelines (GWTG) resuscitation investigators. Hospital variation in epinephrine administration before defibrillation for Cardiac arrest due to Shockable Rhythm. Crit Care Med. 2024;7. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006203 .
Brand J, McDonald A, Dunning J. Management of cardiac arrest following cardiac surgery. BJA Educ. 2018;18:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2017.11.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2017.11.002
pubmed: 33456790
Freundlich RE, Maile MD, Hajjar MM, et al. Years of life lost after complications of coronary artery bypass operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1893–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.048 .
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.048
pubmed: 27938887
Hannen LEM, Toprak B, Weimann J, et al. Clinical characteristics, causes and predictors of outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest: results from the SURVIVE-ARREST study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023;112(2):258–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02084-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02084-1
pubmed: 35978110
Halperin HR, Ambinder DI, Oberdier MT. New insights into Cardiac arrest from Pulseless Electrical Activity. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8(10):1271–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2022.07.019 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.07.019
pubmed: 36266003
Soar J. In-hospital cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023;29(3):181–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001035 .
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001035
pubmed: 37078614
Shan R, Yang J, Kuo A, et al. Continuous heart rate dynamics preceding in-hospital pulseless electrical activity or asystolic cardiac arrest of respiratory etiology. Resuscitation. 2022;179:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.07.026 .
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.07.026
pubmed: 35905864
Michaelis P, Leone RJ. Cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery: an evidence-based resuscitation protocol. Crit Care Nurse. 2019;39:15–25. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2019309 .
doi: 10.4037/ccn2019309
pubmed: 30710033
Penketh J, Nolan JP. In-hospital cardiac arrest: the state of the art. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04247-y .
doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04247-y
pubmed: 36474215
pmcid: 9724368
Dunning J, Fabbri A, Kolh PH, et al. Guideline for resuscitation in cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:3–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.01.033 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.01.033
pubmed: 19297185
Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16suppl2):S366–468. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 .
doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916
pubmed: 33081529
Chan PS, Krumholz HM, Nichol G, et al. American Heart Association National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Investigators. Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706467 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706467
pubmed: 18172170
Miller AC, Rosati SF, Suffredini AF, et al. A systematic review and pooled analysis of CPR-associated cardiovascular and thoracic injuries. Resuscitation. 2014;85:724–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.01.028 .
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.01.028
pubmed: 24525116
pmcid: 4031922
Mackay JH, Powell SJ, Osgathorp J, et al. Six-year prospective audit of chest reopening after cardiac arrest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:421–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00294-4 .
doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00294-4
pubmed: 12204734