"Because people don't know what it is, they don't really know it exists": a qualitative study of postgraduate medical educators' perceptions of dyscalculia.
Dyscalculia
Educator
Neurodiversity
Postgraduate
SpLD
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Aug 2024
20 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
27
11
2023
accepted:
14
08
2024
medline:
20
8
2024
pubmed:
20
8
2024
entrez:
19
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dyscalculia is defined as a specific learning difference or neurodiversity. Despite a move within postgraduate medical education (PGME) towards promoting inclusivity and addressing differential attainment, dyscalculia remains an unexplored area. Using an interpretivist, constructivist, qualitative methodology, this scoping study explores PGME educators' attitudes, understanding and perceived challenges of supporting doctors in training (DiT) with dyscalculia. Through purposive sampling, semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis, the stories of ten Wales-based PGME educators were explored. Multiple themes emerged relating to lack of educator knowledge, experience and identification of learners with dyscalculia. Participants' roles as educators and clinicians were inextricably linked, with PGME seen as deeply embedded in social interactions. Overall, a positive attitude towards doctors with dyscalculia underpinned the strongly DiT-centred approach to supporting learning, tempered by uncertainty over potential patient safety-related risks. Perceiving themselves as learners, educators saw the educator-learner relationship as a major learning route given the lack of dyscalculia training available, with experience leading to confidence. Overall, educators perceived a need for greater dyscalculia awareness, understanding and knowledge, pre-emptive training and evidence-based, feasible guidance introduction. Although methodological limitations are inherent, this study constructs novel, detailed understanding from educators relating to dyscalculia in PGME, providing a basis for future research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Dyscalculia is defined as a specific learning difference or neurodiversity. Despite a move within postgraduate medical education (PGME) towards promoting inclusivity and addressing differential attainment, dyscalculia remains an unexplored area.
METHODS
METHODS
Using an interpretivist, constructivist, qualitative methodology, this scoping study explores PGME educators' attitudes, understanding and perceived challenges of supporting doctors in training (DiT) with dyscalculia. Through purposive sampling, semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis, the stories of ten Wales-based PGME educators were explored.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Multiple themes emerged relating to lack of educator knowledge, experience and identification of learners with dyscalculia. Participants' roles as educators and clinicians were inextricably linked, with PGME seen as deeply embedded in social interactions. Overall, a positive attitude towards doctors with dyscalculia underpinned the strongly DiT-centred approach to supporting learning, tempered by uncertainty over potential patient safety-related risks. Perceiving themselves as learners, educators saw the educator-learner relationship as a major learning route given the lack of dyscalculia training available, with experience leading to confidence.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, educators perceived a need for greater dyscalculia awareness, understanding and knowledge, pre-emptive training and evidence-based, feasible guidance introduction. Although methodological limitations are inherent, this study constructs novel, detailed understanding from educators relating to dyscalculia in PGME, providing a basis for future research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39160552
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05912-2
pii: 10.1186/s12909-024-05912-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
896Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Laurillard D, Butterworth B. Review 4: The role of science and technology in improving outcomes for the case of dyscalculia. In: Current Understanding, Support Systems, and Technology-led Interventions for Specific Learning Difficulties: evidence reviews commissioned for work by the Council for Science and Technology. Council for Science and Technology, Government Office for Science; 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f849afa8fa8f504594d4b84/specific-learning-difficulties-spld-cst-report.pdf . Accessed 24th November 2023.
Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology (POST). Postnote: Dyslexia and dyscalculia. London: Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology. 2014. https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/post/postpn226.pdf . Accessed 9th October 2023.
Drew S. Dyscalculia in higher education. PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, UK; 2016.
Walker E, Shaw S. Specific learning difficulties in healthcare education: the meaning in the nomenclature. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018;32:97–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.01.011
Shaw S. The impacts of dyslexia and dyspraxia on medical education. PhD Thesis, University of Brighton and the University of Sussex; 2021. p. 16.
Lewis K, Lynn D. Against the odds: insights from a statistician with dyscalculia. Educ Sci. 2017;8:63. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020063 .
doi: 10.3390/educsci8020063
Lewis K, Lynn D. An insider’s view of a mathematics learning disability: compensating to gain access to fractions. Investig Math Learn. 2018;10(3):159–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1444927 .
doi: 10.1080/19477503.2018.1444927
Shrewsbury D. State of play: supporting students with specific learning difficulties. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):254–5.
Murphy M, Dowell J, Smith D. Factors associated with declaration of disability in medical students and junior doctors, and the association of declared disability with academic performance: observational study using data from the UK Medical Education Database, 2002–2018 (UKMED54). BMJ Open. 2022;12:e059179. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059179 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059179
Mogensen L, Hu W. ‘A doctor who really knows...’: a survey of community perspectives on medical students and practitioners with disability. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:288. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1715-7
British Medical Association. Disability in the Medical Profession: Survey Findings 2020. 2021. https://www.bma.org.uk/media/2923/bma-disability-in-the-medical-profession.pdf . Accessed 9th October 2023.
General Medical Council. What is differential attainment? 2021. Available from: https:// www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/projects/differential-attainment/what-is-differential-attainment . Accessed 9th October 2023.
General Medial Council. Welcomed and valued: Supporting disabled learners in medical education and training. 2019. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/welcomed-and-valued-2021-english_pdf-86053468.pdf . Accessed 9th October 2023.
Ellis R, Cleland J, Scrimgeour D, Lee A, Brennan P. The impact of disability on performance in a high-stakes postgraduate surgical examination: a retrospective cohort study. J Royal Soc Med. 2022;115(2):58–68.
doi: 10.1177/01410768211032573
Equality Act. 2010. c. 15. [Internet.] 2010. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15 . Accessed 9th October 2023.
Asghar Z, et al. Performance of candidates disclosing dyslexia with other candidates in a UK medical licensing examination: cross-sectional study. Postgrad Med J. 2018;94(1110):198–203.
doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135326
Botan V, Williams N, Law G, Siriwardena A. How is performance at selection to general practice related to performance at the endpoint of GP training? Report to Health Education England. 2022. https://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/48920/ . Accessed 9th October 2023.
Taylor D, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide 83. Med Teach. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153 .
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153
Grant J. Learning needs assessment: assessing the need. BMJ. 2002;324:156–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7330.156 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7330.156
Davis N, Davis D, Bloch R. Continuing medical education: AMEE Education Guide 35. Med Teach. 2008;30(7):652–66.
doi: 10.1080/01421590802108323
Pit-Ten Cate I, Glock S. Teachers’ implicit attitudes toward students from different Social groups: a Meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02832 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02832
Cambridge Dictionary. Meaning of attitude in English. [Internet.] 2022. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/attitude . Accessed 9th October 2023.
L’Ecuyer K. Perceptions of nurse preceptors of students and new graduates with learning difficulties and their willingness to precept them in clinical practice (part 2). Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;34:210–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.12.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.12.004
Ryder D, Norwich B. UK higher education lecturers’ perspectives of dyslexia, dyslexic students and related disability provision. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2019;19:161–72.
doi: 10.1111/1471-3802.12438
Newlands F, Shrewsbury D, Robson J. Foundation doctors and dyslexia: a qualitative study of their experiences and coping strategies. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1073):121–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132573 .
doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132573
Shaw S, Anderson J. The experiences of medical students with dyslexia: an interpretive phenomenological study. Dyslexia. 2018;24(3):220–33.
doi: 10.1002/dys.1587
L’Ecuyer K. Clinical education of nursing students with learning difficulties: an integrative review (part 1). Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;234:173–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.11.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.11.015
Walker E, Shaw S, Reed M, Anderson J. The experiences of foundation doctors with dyspraxia: a phenomenological study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021;26(3):959–74.
doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10029-y
Evans W. If they can’t tell the difference between duphalac and digoxin you’ve got patient safety issues. Nurse lecturers’ constructions of students’ dyslexic identities in nurse education. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;34(6):41–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.11.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.11.004
Illing J, Carter M. Chapter 27: philosophical research perspectives and planning your research. In: Swanwick T, Forrest K, O’Brien B, editors. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2019. pp. 393–6.
Atkinson K, Koenka A, Sanchez C, Moshontz H, Cooper H. Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate. Res Synth Methods. 2015;6(1):87–95.
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1127
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 8th ed. London: Routledge; 2017. pp. 171–86.
doi: 10.4324/9781315456539
Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP): Qualitative checklist. In: Critical Appraisal Checklist. Critical appraisal skills programme. [Internet]. 2018. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ . Accessed 9th October 2023.
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 8th ed. London: Routledge; 2017. pp. 334–5.
doi: 10.4324/9781315456539
DeJonckheere M, Vaughn L. Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Fam Med Com Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057 .
doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000057
O’Hara C. To Teach or Not to Teach? A study of Dyslexia in Teacher Education. Cardiff Metropolitan University, UK;2013 p. 240.
Ryder D. Dyslexia assessment practice within the UK higher education sector: Assessor, lecturer and student perspectives. University of Exeter; 2016.
Schabmann A, Eichert H-C, Schmidt B, Hennes A-K, Ramacher-Faasen N. Knowledge, awareness of problems, and support: university instructors’ perspectives on dyslexia in higher education. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2020;35(2):273–82.
doi: 10.1080/08856257.2019.1628339
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 8th ed. London: Routledge; 2017. pp. 507–24.
doi: 10.4324/9781315456539
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 8th ed. London: Routledge; 2017. ;523.
doi: 10.4324/9781315456539
Malmqvist J, Hellberg K, Möllås G, Rose R, Shevlin M. Conducting the pilot study: a neglected part of the research process? Methodological findings supporting the importance of piloting in qualitative Research studies. Int J Qual Methods. 2019;18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919878341 .
Miller T, Bell L. Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and ‘informed’ consent. In: Mauthner M, Birch M, Jessop J, Miller T, editors. Ethics in qualitative research. London: Sage; 2002. pp. 53–5.
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 8th ed. London: Routledge. 2017.;523.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun V, Clarke V. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Couns Psychother Res. 2020;21(2):37–47.
Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic P, Long D, Panter A, Rindskopf D, Sher K, editors. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, vol. 2: Research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2012. pp. 57–71.
doi: 10.1037/13620-004
Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–97.
doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Byrne DA. Worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant. 2021;56:1391–412.
doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual. Res Psychol. 2021;18(3):328–52.
Finlay L. Outing the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(4):531–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052 .
doi: 10.1177/104973202129120052
Beer O. There’s a certain slant of light’: the experience of discovery in qualitative interviewing. OTJR. 1997;17(2):127.
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 8th ed. London: Routledge; 2017. ;112.
doi: 10.4324/9781315456539
Cameron H, Nunkoosing K. Lecturer perspectives on dyslexia and dyslexic students within one faculty at one university in England. Teach High Educ. 2012;17(3):341–52.
doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.641002
West M, Coia D. Caring for doctors, caring for patients. London:General Medical Council. 2019. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/caring-for-doctors-caring-for-patients_pdf-80706341.pdf . Accessed 8th October 2023.
Kaufman DM. Teaching and learning in Medical Education: how theory can inform practice. In: Swanwick T, Forrest K, O’Brien BC, editors. Understanding Medical Education evidence theory and practice. New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell; 2019. pp. 58–9.
Swanwick T. Postgraduate medical education: the same, but different. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91:179–81.
doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132805
Farmer M, Riddick B, Sterling C. Dyslexia and inclusion: assessment and support in higher education. London: Whurr; 2002. pp. 175–81.
Mortimore T. Dyslexia in higher education: creating a fully inclusive institution. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2013;13:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2012.01231.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2012.01231.x
Morris C. Chapter 12: Work-based learning. In: Swanwick T, Forrest K, O’Brien B, editors. Understanding medical education: Evidence, theory and practice. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2019. p.168.
Sandhu D. Postgraduate medical education – challenges and innovative solutions. Med Teach. 2018;40(6):607–9.
doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1461997
Ricketts C, Brice J, Coombes L. Are multiple choice tests fair to medical students with specific learning disabilities? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15:265–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9197-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9197-8
Asghar Z, Williams N, Denney M, Siriwardena A. Performance in candidates declaring versus those not declaring dyslexia in a licensing clinical examination. Med Educ. 2019;53(12):1243–52.
doi: 10.1111/medu.13953
Riddell S, Weedon E. What counts as a reasonable adjustment? Dyslexic students and the concept of fair assessment. Int Stud Sociol Educ. 2006;16(1):57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19620210600804301 .
doi: 10.1080/19620210600804301
Riddick R, English E. Meeting the standards? Dyslexic students and the selection process for initial teacher training. Eur J Teach Educ. 2006;29(2):203–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760600617383 .
doi: 10.1080/02619760600617383
Morris D, Turnbull P. Clinical experiences of students with dyslexia. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54(2):238–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03806.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03806.x
General Medical Council. National Training Survey 2024 results. [Internet]. 2024 p. 4–5, 24–25, 28–32. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/national-training-survey-summary-report-2024_pdf-107834344.pdf . Accessed 26/7/2024.