Cdc42 mobility and membrane flows regulate fission yeast cell shape and survival.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 08 08 2023
accepted: 13 09 2024
medline: 28 9 2024
pubmed: 28 9 2024
entrez: 27 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Polarized exocytosis induced by local Cdc42 GTPase activity results in membrane flows that deplete low-mobility membrane-associated proteins. A reaction-diffusion particle model comprising Cdc42 positive feedback activation, hydrolysis by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), and flow-induced displacement by exo/endocytosis shows that flow-induced depletion of low mobility GAPs promotes polarization. We modified Cdc42 mobility in Schizosaccharomyces pombe by replacing its prenylation site with 1, 2 or 3 repeats of the Rit C-terminal membrane-binding domain (ritC), yielding alleles with progressively lower mobility and increased flow-coupling. While Cdc42-1ritC cells are viable and polarized, Cdc42-2ritC polarize poorly and Cdc42-3ritC are inviable, in agreement with model's predictions. Deletion of Cdc42 GAPs restores viability to Cdc42-3ritC cells, verifying the model's prediction that GAP deletion increases Cdc42 activity at the expense of polarization. Our work demonstrates how membrane flows are an integral part of Cdc42-driven pattern formation and require Cdc42-GTP to turn over faster than the surface on which it forms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39333500
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52655-1
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-52655-1
doi:

Substances chimiques

Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins 0
cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein EC 3.6.5.2
cdc42 protein, S pombe 0
GTPase-Activating Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8363

Subventions

Organisme : Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation)
ID : 310030_207909
Organisme : Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation)
ID : 310030_191990
Organisme : EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council)
ID : 101019630
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
ID : R35GM136372
Organisme : NSF | Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering | Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS)
ID : 2019035

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Pruyne, D. & Bretscher, A. Polarization of cell growth in yeast. J. Cell Sci. 113, 571–585 (2000).
pubmed: 10652251 doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.4.571
Steinberg, G., Penalva, M. A., Riquelme, M., Wosten, H. A. & Harris, S. D. Cell biology of hyphal growth. Microbiol. Spectr. 5, https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0034-2016 (2017).
Chiou, J. G., Balasubramanian, M. K. & Lew, D. J. Cell polarity in yeast. Annu Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 77–101 (2017).
pubmed: 28783960 pmcid: 5944360 doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060856
Martin, S. G. & Arkowitz, R. A. Cell polarization in budding and fission yeasts. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38, 228–253 (2014).
pubmed: 24354645 doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12055
Martin, S. G. Spontaneous cell polarization: feedback control of Cdc42 GTPase breaks cellular symmetry. Bioessays 37, 1193–1201 (2015).
pubmed: 26338468 doi: 10.1002/bies.201500077
Goryachev, A. B. & Leda, M. Many roads to symmetry breaking: molecular mechanisms and theoretical models of yeast cell polarity. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 370–380 (2017).
pubmed: 28137950 pmcid: 5341721 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e16-10-0739
Woods, B. & Lew, D. J. Polarity establishment by Cdc42: Key roles for positive feedback and differential mobility. Small GTPases 10, 130–137 (2019).
pubmed: 28350208 doi: 10.1080/21541248.2016.1275370
Halatek, J., Brauns, F. & Frey, E. Self-organization principles of intracellular pattern formation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20170107 (2018).
pubmed: 29632261 pmcid: 5904295 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0107
Turing, A. M. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 237, 37–72 (1952).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.1952.0012
Lamas, I., Merlini, L., Vjestica, A., Vincenzetti, V. & Martin, S. G. Optogenetics reveals Cdc42 local activation by scaffold-mediated positive feedback and Ras GTPase. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000600 (2020).
pubmed: 31978045 pmcid: 7002011 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000600
Witte, K., Strickland, D. & Glotzer, M. Cell cycle entry triggers a switch between two modes of Cdc42 activation during yeast polarization. eLife 6, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26722 (2017).
Butty, A. C. et al. A positive feedback loop stabilizes the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24 at sites of polarization. Embo J. 21, 1565–1576 (2002).
pubmed: 11927541 pmcid: 125953 doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.7.1565
Kozubowski, L. et al. Symmetry-breaking polarization driven by a Cdc42p GEF-PAK complex. Curr. Biol. 18, 1719–1726 (2008).
pubmed: 19013066 pmcid: 2803100 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.060
Irazoqui, J. E., Gladfelter, A. S. & Lew, D. J. Scaffold-mediated symmetry breaking by Cdc42p. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 1062–1070 (2003).
pubmed: 14625559 doi: 10.1038/ncb1068
Woods, B. et al. Parallel actin-independent recycling pathways polarize Cdc42 in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 26, 2114–2126 (2016).
pubmed: 27476596 pmcid: 5956535 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.047
Klunder, B., Freisinger, T., Wedlich-Soldner, R. & Frey, E. GDI-mediated cell polarization in yeast provides precise spatial and temporal control of Cdc42 signaling. PLoS Comput Biol. 9, e1003396 (2013).
pubmed: 24348237 pmcid: 3861033 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003396
Bendezu, F. O. et al. Spontaneous Cdc42 polarization independent of GDI-mediated extraction and actin-based trafficking. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002097 (2015).
pubmed: 25837586 pmcid: 4383620 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002097
Meinhardt, H. & Gierer, A. Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition. Bioessays 22, 753–760 (2000).
pubmed: 10918306 doi: 10.1002/1521-1878(200008)22:8<753::AID-BIES9>3.0.CO;2-Z
Goryachev, A. B. & Pokhilko, A. V. Dynamics of Cdc42 network embodies a turing-type mechanism of yeast cell polarity. FEBS Lett. 582, 1437–1443 (2008).
pubmed: 18381072 doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.03.029
Freisinger, T. et al. Establishment of a robust single axis of cell polarity by coupling multiple positive feedback loops. Nat. Commun. 4, 1807 (2013).
pubmed: 23651995 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2795
Howell, A. S. et al. Negative feedback enhances robustness in the yeast polarity establishment circuit. Cell 149, 322–333 (2012).
pubmed: 22500799 pmcid: 3680131 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.012
Wu, C. F. et al. Role of competition between polarity sites in establishing a unique front. eLife 4, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11611 (2015).
Khalili, B., Lovelace, H. D., Rutkowski, D. M., Holz, D. & Vavylonis, D. Fission yeast polarization: modeling Cdc42 oscillations, symmetry breaking, and zones of activation and inhibition. Cells 9, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081769 (2020).
Rincon, S. A., Estravis, M. & Perez, P. Cdc42 regulates polarized growth and cell integrity in fission yeast. Biochem Soc. Trans. 42, 201–205 (2014).
pubmed: 24450652 doi: 10.1042/BST20130155
Harris, K. P. & Tepass, U. Cdc42 and vesicle trafficking in polarized cells. Traffic 11, 1272–1279 (2010).
pubmed: 20633244 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01102.x
Wedlich-Soldner, R., Altschuler, S., Wu, L. & Li, R. Spontaneous cell polarization through actomyosin-based delivery of the Cdc42 GTPase. Science 299, 1231–1235 (2003).
pubmed: 12560471 doi: 10.1126/science.1080944
Layton, A. T. et al. Modeling vesicle traffic reveals unexpected consequences for Cdc42p-mediated polarity establishment. Curr. Biol. 21, 184–194 (2011).
pubmed: 21277209 pmcid: 3052744 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.012
Savage, N. S., Layton, A. T. & Lew, D. J. Mechanistic mathematical model of polarity in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 1998–2013 (2012).
pubmed: 22438587 pmcid: 3350562 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e11-10-0837
Gerganova, V. et al. Cell patterning by secretion-induced plasma membrane flows. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg6718 (2021).
pubmed: 34533984 pmcid: 8448446 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg6718
Gerganova, V. & Martin, S. G. Going with the membrane flow: the impact of polarized secretion on bulk plasma membrane flows. FEBS J. 290, 669–676 (2023).
pubmed: 34797957 doi: 10.1111/febs.16287
Lee, C. H., Della, N. G., Chew, C. E. & Zack, D. J. Rin, a neuron-specific and calmodulin-binding small G-protein, and Rit define a novel subfamily of ras proteins. J. Neurosci. 16, 6784–6794 (1996).
pubmed: 8824319 pmcid: 6579259 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-21-06784.1996
Das, M. et al. Regulation of cell diameter, For3p localization, and cell symmetry by fission yeast Rho-GAP Rga4p. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2090–2101 (2007).
pubmed: 17377067 pmcid: 1877093 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-09-0883
Revilla-Guarinos, M. T. et al. Rga6 is a fission yeast Rho GAP involved in Cdc42 regulation of polarized growth. Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 1524–1535 (2016).
pubmed: 26960792 pmcid: 4850039 doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-12-0818
Tatebe, H., Nakano, K., Maximo, R. & Shiozaki, K. Pom1 DYRK regulates localization of the Rga4 GAP to ensure bipolar activation of Cdc42 in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 18, 322–330 (2008).
pubmed: 18328707 pmcid: 2277499 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.005
Lamas, I., Weber, N. & Martin, S. G. Activation of Cdc42 GTPase upon CRY2-induced cortical recruitment is antagonized by GAPs in fission yeast. Cells 9, 2089 (2020).
pubmed: 32932721 pmcid: 7565336 doi: 10.3390/cells9092089
Gallo Castro, D. & Martin, S. G. Differential GAP requirement for Cdc42-GTP polarization during proliferation and sexual reproduction. J. Cell Biol. 217, 4215–4229 (2018).
pubmed: 30279276 pmcid: 6279383 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201806016
Wright, L. P. & Philips, M. R. Thematic review series: lipid posttranslational modifications. CAAX modification and membrane targeting of Ras. J. lipid Res. 47, 883–891 (2006).
pubmed: 16543601 doi: 10.1194/jlr.R600004-JLR200
Watson, L. J., Rossi, G. & Brennwald, P. Quantitative analysis of membrane trafficking in regulation of Cdc42 polarity. Traffic 15, 1330–1343 (2014).
pubmed: 25158298 pmcid: 4260267 doi: 10.1111/tra.12211
Dyer, J. M. et al. Tracking shallow chemical gradients by actin-driven wandering of the polarization site. Curr. Biol. 23, 32–41 (2013).
pubmed: 23200992 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.014
Jose, M., Tollis, S., Nair, D., Sibarita, J. B. & McCusker, D. Robust polarity establishment occurs via an endocytosis-based cortical corralling mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 200, 407–418 (2013).
pubmed: 23401000 pmcid: 3575534 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201206081
Pablo, M., Ramirez, S. A. & Elston, T. C. Particle-based simulations of polarity establishment reveal stochastic promotion of turing pattern formation. PLoS Comput Biol. 14, e1006016 (2018).
pubmed: 29529021 pmcid: 5864077 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006016
Das, M. et al. Oscillatory dynamics of Cdc42 GTPase in the control of polarized growth. Science 337, 239–243 (2012).
pubmed: 22604726 pmcid: 3681419 doi: 10.1126/science.1218377
Gierer, A. & Meinhardt, H. A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik 12, 30–39 (1972).
pubmed: 4663624 doi: 10.1007/BF00289234
Wei, W. et al. The Cdc42 GAP Rga6 promotes monopolar outgrowth of spores. J. Cell Biol. 222, e202202064 (2023).
pubmed: 36355349 doi: 10.1083/jcb.202202064
Rich-Robinson, J., Russell, A., Mancini, E. & Das, M. Cdc42 reactivation at growth sites is regulated by local cell-cycle-dependent loss of its GTPase-activating protein Rga4 in fission yeast. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs259291 (2021).
pubmed: 34523683 pmcid: 8542386 doi: 10.1242/jcs.259291
Okada, S. et al. Daughter cell identity emerges from the interplay of Cdc42, septins, and exocytosis. Dev. Cell 26, 148–161 (2013).
pubmed: 23906065 pmcid: 3730058 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.06.015
Dighe, S. A. & Kozminski, K. G. Secretory vesicles deliver Cdc42p to sites of polarized growth in S. cerevisiae. PLoS One 9, e99494 (2014).
pubmed: 24945395 pmcid: 4063767 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099494
Tay, Y. D., Leda, M., Goryachev, A. B. & Sawin, K. E. Local and global Cdc42 GEFs for fission yeast cell polarity are coordinated by microtubules and the Tea1/Tea4/Pom1 axis. J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs216580 (2018).
pubmed: 29930085 pmcid: 6080602 doi: 10.1242/jcs.216580
Kokkoris, K., Gallo Castro, D. & Martin, S. G. The Tea4-PP1 landmark promotes local growth by dual Cdc42 GEF recruitment and GAP exclusion. J. Cell Sci. 127, 2005–2016 (2014).
pubmed: 24554432
Trogdon, M. et al. The effect of cell geometry on polarization in budding yeast. PLoS Comput Biol. 14, e1006241 (2018).
pubmed: 29889845 pmcid: 6013239 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006241
Banavar, S. P. et al. Coordinating cell polarization and morphogenesis through mechanical feedback. PLoS Comput Biol. 17, e1007971 (2021).
pubmed: 33507956 pmcid: 7872284 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007971
Li, H. et al. The REN4 rheostat dynamically coordinates the apical and lateral domains of Arabidopsis pollen tubes. Nat. Commun. 9, 2573 (2018).
pubmed: 29968705 pmcid: 6030205 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04838-w
Bartnicki-Garcia, S., Garduno-Rosales, M., Delgado-Alvarez, D. L. & Mourino-Perez, R. R. Experimental measurement of endocytosis in fungal hyphae. Fungal Genet Biol. 118, 32–36 (2018).
pubmed: 30017938 doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2018.07.001
Castro-Villarreal, P., Villada-Balbuena, A., Mendez-Alcaraz, J. M., Castaneda-Priego, R. & Estrada-Jimenez, S. A Brownian dynamics algorithm for colloids in curved manifolds. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 214115 (2014).
pubmed: 24907998 doi: 10.1063/1.4881060
Doi, M. Stochastic theory of diffusion-controlled reaction. J. Phys. a-Math. Gen. 9, 1479–1495 (1976).
doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/9/9/009
Erban, R. & Chapman, S. J. Stochastic modelling of reaction-diffusion processes: algorithms for bimolecular reactions. Phys. Biol. 6, 046001 (2009).
pubmed: 19700812 doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/6/4/046001
Lipkova, J., Zygalakis, K. C., Chapman, S. J. & Erban, R. Analysis of brownian dynamics simulations of reversible bimolecular reactions. Siam J. Appl Math. 71, 714–730 (2011).
doi: 10.1137/100794213
Chang, E. C. et al. Cooperative interaction of S. pombe proteins required for mating and morphogenesis. Cell 79, 131–141 (1994).
pubmed: 7923372 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90406-5
Coll, P. M., Trillo, Y., Ametzazurra, A. & Perez, P. Gef1p, a new guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Cdc42p, regulates polarity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 313–323 (2003).
pubmed: 12529446 pmcid: 140247 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-07-0400
McClure, A. W. et al. Role of polarized G protein signaling in tracking pheromone gradients. Dev. Cell 35, 471–482 (2015).
pubmed: 26609960 pmcid: 4661441 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.10.024
Cheng, H. et al. Role of the Rab GTP-binding protein Ypt3 in the fission yeast exocytic pathway and its connection to calcineurin function. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 2963–2976 (2002).
pubmed: 12181359 pmcid: 117955 doi: 10.1091/mbc.01-09-0463
Lee, J. H., Heuser, J. E., Roth, R. & Goodenough, U. Eisosome ultrastructure and evolution in fungi, microalgae, and lichens. Eukaryot. Cell 14, 1017–1042 (2015).
pubmed: 26253157 pmcid: 4588622 doi: 10.1128/EC.00106-15
Wang, N., Lee, I. J., Rask, G. & Wu, J. Q. Roles of the TRAPP-II complex and the exocyst in membrane deposition during fission yeast cytokinesis. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002437 (2016).
pubmed: 27082518 pmcid: 4833314 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002437
Kukulski, W., Schorb, M., Kaksonen, M. & Briggs, J. A. Plasma membrane reshaping during endocytosis is revealed by time-resolved electron tomography. Cell 150, 508–520 (2012).
pubmed: 22863005 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.046
Chernomordik, L. V. & Kozlov, M. M. Mechanics of membrane fusion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 675–683 (2008).
pubmed: 18596814 pmcid: 2548310 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1455
Shin, W. et al. Vesicle shrinking and enlargement play opposing roles in the release of exocytotic contents. Cell Rep. 30, 421–431 e427 (2020).
pubmed: 31940486 pmcid: 7010319 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.044
Chabanon, M., Ho, J. C. S., Liedberg, B., Parikh, A. N. & Rangamani, P. Pulsatile lipid vesicles under osmotic stress. Biophys. J. 112, 1682–1691 (2017).
pubmed: 28445759 pmcid: 5406380 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.03.018
Shi, Z., Graber, Z. T., Baumgart, T., Stone, H. A. & Cohen, A. E. Cell membranes resist flow. Cell 175, 1769–1779.e1713 (2018).
pubmed: 30392960 pmcid: 6541487 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.054
Gillespie, D. T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2340–2361 (1977).
doi: 10.1021/j100540a008

Auteurs

David M Rutkowski (DM)

Department of Physics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.

Vincent Vincenzetti (V)

Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Dimitrios Vavylonis (D)

Department of Physics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA. vavylonis@lehigh.edu.

Sophie G Martin (SG)

Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. sophie.martin@unige.ch.
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, Geneva, Switzerland. sophie.martin@unige.ch.

Articles similaires

Meiosis Schizosaccharomyces Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins Spores, Fungal
Humans Deep Learning Mouth Neoplasms Drug Resistance, Neoplasm Cell Line, Tumor
Schizosaccharomyces Meiosis Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins Mitosis Epigenesis, Genetic
Humans Animals Adherens Junctions Intercellular Junctions Tight Junctions

Classifications MeSH