Improvement in Microbiota Recovery Using Cas-9 Digestion of Mānuka Plastid and Mitochondrial DNA.


Journal

Microbial ecology
ISSN: 1432-184X
Titre abrégé: Microb Ecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7500663

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 06 05 2024
accepted: 19 09 2024
medline: 9 10 2024
pubmed: 9 10 2024
entrez: 8 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Understanding host-microbe interactions in planta is an expanding area of research. Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is a powerful and common method to study bacterial communities associated with plants. However, the co-amplification of mitochondrial and plastid 16S rRNA genes by universal primers impairs the sensitivity and performance of 16S rRNA sequencing. In 2020, a new method, Cas-16S-seq, was reported in the literature to remove host contamination for profiling the microbiota in rice, a well-studied domestic plant, by engineering RNA-programmable Cas9 nuclease in 16S rRNA sequencing. For the first time, we tested the efficiency and applicability of the Cas-16S-seq method on foliage, flowers, and seed of a non-domesticated wild plant for which there is limited genomic information, Leptospermum scoparium (mānuka). Our study demonstrated the efficiency of the Cas-16S-seq method for L. scoparium in removing host contamination in V4-16S amplicons. An increase of 46% in bacterial sequences was found using six guide RNAs (gRNAs), three gRNAs targeting the mitochondrial sequence, and three gRNAs targeting the chloroplast sequence of L. scoparium in the same reaction. An increase of 72% in bacterial sequences was obtained by targeting the mitochondrial and chloroplast sequences of L. scoparium in the same sample at two different steps of the library preparation (DNA and 1st step PCR). The number of OTUs (operational taxonomic units) retrieved from soil samples was consistent when using the different methods (Cas-16S-seq and 16S-seq) indicating that the Cas-16S-seq implemented for L. scoparium did not introduce bias to microbiota profiling. Our findings provide a valuable tool for future studies investigating the bacterial microbiota of L. scoparium in addition to evaluating an important tool in the plant microbiota research on other non-domesticated wild species.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39379709
doi: 10.1007/s00248-024-02436-6
pii: 10.1007/s00248-024-02436-6
doi:

Substances chimiques

RNA, Ribosomal, 16S 0
DNA, Mitochondrial 0
DNA, Bacterial 0
RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

124

Subventions

Organisme : Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
ID : C11X1803
Organisme : Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
ID : C11X1803
Organisme : Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
ID : C11X1803
Organisme : Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
ID : C11X1803

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Silverstein MR, Segre D, Bhatnagar JM (2023) Environmental microbiome engineering for the mitigation of climate change. Glob Chang Biol 29:2050–2066. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16609
doi: 10.1111/gcb.16609 pubmed: 36661406
Afridi MS, Javed MA, Ali S, De Medeiros FHV, Ali B, Salam A, Sumaira MRA, Alkhalifah DHM, Selim S, Santoyo G (2022) New opportunities in plant microbiome engineering for increasing agricultural sustainability under stressful conditions. Front Plant Sci 13:899464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.899464
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.899464 pubmed: 36186071 pmcid: 9524194
Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, Cernava T, Vergès M-CC, Charles T, Chen X, Cocolin L, Eversole K, Corral GH, Kazou M, Kinkel L, Lange L, Lima N, Loy A, Macklin JA, Maguin E, Mauchline T, McClure R, Mitter B, Ryan M, Sarand I, Smidt H, Schelkle B, Roume H, Kiran GS, Selvin J, Souza RSCd, van Overbeek L, Singh BK, Wagner M, Walsh A, Sessitsch A, Schloter M (2020) Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 8:103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0
doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0 pubmed: 32605663 pmcid: 7329523
Martin WF, Garg S, Zimorski V (2015) Endosymbiotic theories for eukaryote origin. Phil Trans R Soc B 370:20140330–20140330. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0330
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0330 pubmed: 26323761 pmcid: 4571569
Lundberg DS, Lebeis SL, Paredes SH, Yourstone S, Gehring J, Malfatti S, Tremblay J, Engelbrektson A, Kunin V, Rio TGD, Edgar RC, Eickhorst T, Ley RE, Hugenholtz P, Tringe SG, Dangl JL (2012) Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488:86–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11237
doi: 10.1038/nature11237 pubmed: 22859206 pmcid: 4074413
Lundberg DS, Yourstone S, Mieczkowski P, Jones CD, Dangl JL (2013) Practical innovations for high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Nat Methods 10:999–1002. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2634
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2634 pubmed: 23995388
Zarraonaindia I, Owens SM, Weisenhorn P, West K, Hampton-Marcell J, Lax S, Bokulich NA, Mills DA, Martin G, Taghavi S, van der Lelie D, Gilbert JA (2015) The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota. mBio 6:e02527-02514. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02527-14
doi: 10.1128/mBio.02527-14 pubmed: 25805735 pmcid: 4453523
Mayer T, Mari A, Almario J, Murillo-Roos M, Abdullah HSM, Dombrowski N, Hacquard S, Kemen EM, Agler MT (2021) Obtaining deeper insights into microbiome diversity using a simple method to block host and nontargets in amplicon sequencing. Mol Ecol Resour 21:1952–1965. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13408
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13408 pubmed: 33905604
Shade A, McManus PS, Handelsman J (2013) Unexpected diversity during community succession in the apple flower microbiome. mBio 4:e00602-00612. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00602-12
doi: 10.1128/mBio.00602-12 pubmed: 23443006 pmcid: 3585449
Jackrel SL, Owens SM, Gilbert JA, Pfister CA (2017) Identifying the plant-associated microbiome across aquatic and terrestrial environments: the effects of amplification method on taxa discovery. Mol Ecol Resour 17:931–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12645
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12645 pubmed: 27997751
Song L, Xie K (2020) Engineering CRISPR/Cas9 to mitigate abundant host contamination for 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing. Microbiome 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00859-0
doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00859-0
Toju H, Tanabe AS, Yamamoto S, Sato H (2012) High-coverage ITS primers for the DNA-based identification of ascomycetes and basidiomycetes in environmental samples. PLoS ONE 7:e40863–e40863. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040863
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040863 pubmed: 22808280 pmcid: 3395698
Toju H, Peay KG, Yamamichi M, Narisawa K, Hiruma K, Naito K, Fukuda S, Ushio M, Nakaoka S, Onoda Y, Yoshida K, Schlaeppi K, Bai Y, Sugiura R, Ichihashi Y, Minamisawa K, Kiers ET (2018) Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems. Nature Plants 4:247–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0139-4
doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0139-4 pubmed: 29725101
Larrouy JL, Dhami MK, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ (2023) Physiological stage drives fungal community dynamics and diversity in Leptospermum scoparium (mānuka) flowers. Environ Microbiol 25:766–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16324
doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16324 pubmed: 36562630
Bengtsson-Palme J, Hartmann M, Eriksson KM, Pal C, Thorell K, Larsson DGJ, Nilsson RH (2015) METAXA2: improved identification and taxonomic classification of small and large subunit rRNA in metagenomic data. Mol Ecol Resourc 15:1403–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12399
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12399
McKinney W (2010) Data structures for statistical computing in python: Proc. of the 9th python in science conf. (SCIPY 2010) : 56–61. https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
Gonzalez JM, Portillo MC, Belda-Ferre P, Mira A (2012) Amplification by PCR artificially reduces the proportion of the rare biosphere in microbial communities. PLoS ONE 7:e29973–e29973. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029973
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029973 pubmed: 22253843 pmcid: 3256211
Eisenhofer R, Minich JJ, Marotz C, Cooper A, Knight R, Weyrich LS (2019) Contamination in low microbial biomass microbiome studies: issues and recommendations. Trends Microbiol 27:105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2018.11.003
doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.11.003 pubmed: 30497919

Auteurs

J L Larrouy (JL)

Department of Pest-Management and Conservation, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Christchurch, 7647, New Zealand. Justine.larrouy@plantandfood.co.nz.
The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Lincoln, 7608, New Zealand. Justine.larrouy@plantandfood.co.nz.

H J Ridgway (HJ)

Department of Pest-Management and Conservation, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Christchurch, 7647, New Zealand.
The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Lincoln, 7608, New Zealand.

M K Dhami (MK)

Biocontrol & Molecular Ecology, Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, 7608, New Zealand.

E E Jones (EE)

Department of Pest-Management and Conservation, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Christchurch, 7647, New Zealand.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations inhibit melanoma metastasis.

Spencer D Shelton, Sara House, Luiza Martins Nascentes Melo et al.
1.00
DNA, Mitochondrial Humans Melanoma Mutation Neoplasm Metastasis
Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Aerosols Humans Decontamination Air Microbiology Masks

Classifications MeSH