Active-bromide and surfactant synergy for enhanced microfouling control.


Journal

Archives of microbiology
ISSN: 1432-072X
Titre abrégé: Arch Microbiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0410427

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 31 05 2024
accepted: 29 09 2024
revised: 16 09 2024
medline: 11 10 2024
pubmed: 11 10 2024
entrez: 10 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Biofilms are structured microbial communities encased in a matrix of self-produced extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) and pose significant challenges in various industrial cooling systems. A nuclear power plant uses a biocide active-bromide for control of biological growth in its condenser cooling system. This study is aimed at evaluating the anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm efficacy of active-bromide against planktonic and biofilm-forming bacteria that are commonly encountered in seawater cooling systems. The results demonstrated that active-bromide at the concentration used at the power plant (1 ppm) exhibited minimal killing activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa planktonic cells. The bacterial cell surface hydrophobicity assay using Staphylococcus aureus and P. aeruginosa indicated that Triton-X 100 significantly decreased the hydrophobicity of planktonic cells, enhancing the susceptibility of the cells to active-bromide. Biofilm inhibition assays revealed limited efficacy of active-bromide at 1 ppm concentration, but significant inhibition at 5 ppm and 10 ppm. However, the addition of a surfactant, Triton-X 100, in combination with 1 ppm active-bromide displayed a synergistic effect, leading to significant biofilm dispersal of pre-formed P. aeruginosa biofilms. This observation was substantiated by epifluorescence microscopy using a live/dead bacterial assay that showed the combination treatment resulted in extensive cell death within the biofilm, as indicated by a marked increase in red fluorescence, compared to treatments with either agent alone. These findings suggest that active bromide alone may be insufficient for microfouling control in the seawater-based condenser cooling system of the power plant. Including a biocompatible surfactant that disrupts established biofilms (microfouling) can significantly improve the efficacy of active bromide treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39387929
doi: 10.1007/s00203-024-04154-6
pii: 10.1007/s00203-024-04154-6
doi:

Substances chimiques

Surface-Active Agents 0
Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Bromides 0
Disinfectants 0
Octoxynol 9002-93-1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

430

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Banat IM, De Rienzo MA, Quinn GA (2014) Microbial biofilms: biosurfactants as antibiofilm agents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(24):9915–9929
doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6169-6 pubmed: 25359476
Boyce, J. M. (2023). Quaternary ammonium disinfectants and antiseptics: tolerance, resistance and potential impact on antibiotic resistance. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 12(1), 32.
Cai M, Liu W, Sun W (2018) Formation and speciation of disinfection byproducts in desalinated seawater blended with treated drinking water during chlorination. Desalin Water Treat 437:7–14
doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2018.02.009
Ceresa C et al (2020) The effect of sophorolipids against microbial biofilms on medical-grade silicone. J Biotechnol 309:34–43
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.12.019 pubmed: 31887325
Codony F, Morato J, Mas J (2005) Role of discontinuous chlorination on microbial production by drinking water biofilms. Water Res 39(9):1896–1906
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.02.016 pubmed: 15899288
Da-Silva-Correa LH et al (2022) The application of non-oxidizing biocides to prevent biofouling in reverse osmosis polyamide membrane systems: a review. AQUA—Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems Society, 71(2):261–292
de Carvalho C (2017) Biofilms: microbial strategies for surviving UV exposure. Adv Exp Med Biol 996:233–239
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56017-5_19 pubmed: 29124704
De Sotto R, Tang R, Bae S (2020) Biofilms in premise plumbing systems as a double-edged sword: microbial community composition and functional profiling of biofilms in a tropical region. J Water Health 18(2):172–185
doi: 10.2166/wh.2020.182 pubmed: 32300090
Desai N, Ardekani AM (2020) Biofilms at interfaces: microbial distribution in floating films. Soft Matter 16(7):1731–1750
doi: 10.1039/C9SM02038A pubmed: 31976509
Hodl I et al (2014) Biophysical controls on cluster dynamics and architectural differentiation of microbial biofilms in contrasting flow environments. Environ Microbiol 16(3):802–812
doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12205 pubmed: 23879839
Hu Z et al (2005) Determination of spatial distributions of zinc and active biomass in microbial biofilms by two-photon laser scanning microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(7):4014–4021
doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4014-4021.2005 pubmed: 16000816 pmcid: 1168982
Hussaini IM et al (2024) Microbial anti-biofilms: types and mechanism of action. Res Microbiol 175(3):104111
doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2023.104111 pubmed: 37844786
Ketyi I (1995) A model for testing drug susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus grown in biofilms on medical devices. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 42(2):215–219
pubmed: 7551716
Kolter R (2010) Biofilms in lab and nature: a molecular geneticist’s voyage to microbial ecology. Int Microbiol 13(1):1–7
pubmed: 20890834
Kumar Shukla S, Rao TS (2013) Dispersal of Bap-mediated Staphylococcus aureus biofilm by proteinase K. J Antibiot 66(2):55–60
doi: 10.1038/ja.2012.98
Liu B et al (2016) Purification and characterization of biosurfactant produced by Bacillus licheniformis Y-1 and its application in remediation of petroleum contaminated soil. Mar Pollut Bull 107(1):46–51
doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.04.025 pubmed: 27114088
Liu C et al (2021) Preferential halogenation of algal organic matter by iodine over chlorine and bromine: formation of disinfection byproducts and correlation with toxicity of disinfected waters. Environ Sci Technol 56(2):1244–1256
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04823 pubmed: 34962797
Meireles A et al (2017) Comparative stability and efficacy of selected chlorine-based biocides against Escherichia coli in planktonic and biofilm states. 102:511–518
Nalepa CJ, Moore RM Jr (2013) Active bromine containing biocidal compositions and their preparation. Google Patents
Papadatou M et al (2021) Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance. Microbiologyopen 10(4):e1231
doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1231 pubmed: 34459542 pmcid: 8383905
Pedersen K (1982) Method for studying microbial biofilms in flowing-water systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 43(1):6–13
doi: 10.1128/aem.43.1.6-13.1982 pubmed: 16345929 pmcid: 241775
Pieper C et al (2010) Investigation of the microbial degradation of phenazone-type drugs and their metabolites by natural biofilms derived from river water using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Water Res 44(15):4559–4569
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.028 pubmed: 20619430
Roy PK, Ghosh M (2017) Chlorine resistant bacteria isolated from drinking water treatment plants in West Bengal. Desalin Water Treat 79:103–107
doi: 10.5004/dwt.2017.20697
Shukla SK, Rao TS (2017a) An Improved Crystal Violet Assay for Biofilm Quantification in 96-Well Microtitre Plate. bioRxiv p. 100214
Shukla SK, Rao TS (2017b) Staphylococcus aureus biofilm removal by targeting biofilm-associated extracellular proteins. Indian J Med Res 146(Suppl 1):S1–S8
pubmed: 29205189 pmcid: 5735565
Sonawane JM et al (2022) Microbial biofilms: recent advances and progress in environmental bioremediation. Sci Total Environ 824:153843
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153843 pubmed: 35176385
Tachikawa M (2017) Biofilms and Oxidizing biocides; evaluation of disinfection and removal effects by using established Microbial systems. Yakugaku Zasshi 137(6):707–717
doi: 10.1248/yakushi.16-00254 pubmed: 28566577
Wicke D, Bockelmann U, Reemtsma T (2008) Environmental influences on the partitioning and diffusion of hydrophobic organic contaminants in microbial biofilms. Environ Sci Technol 42(6):1990–1996
doi: 10.1021/es702267s pubmed: 18409626

Auteurs

Sudhir K Shukla (SK)

Biofouling and Biofilm Processes Section, Water & Steam Chemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Facilities, Kalpakkam, 603102, India. skshukla@igcar.gov.in.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400094, India. skshukla@igcar.gov.in.

T Subba Rao (TS)

School of Arts & Sciences, Sai University, OMR, Chennai, 603104, India. subbarao.t@saiuniversity.edu.in.

Malathy N (M)

Biofouling and Biofilm Processes Section, Water & Steam Chemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Facilities, Kalpakkam, 603102, India.

T V Krishna Mohan (TVK)

Water & Steam Chemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Facilities, Kalpakkam, 603102, India.

Articles similaires

Vancomycin-associated DRESS demonstrates delay in AST abnormalities.

Ahmed Hussein, Kateri L Schoettinger, Jourdan Hydol-Smith et al.
1.00
Humans Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome Vancomycin Female Male
Humans Arthroplasty, Replacement, Elbow Prosthesis-Related Infections Debridement Anti-Bacterial Agents
Vancomycin Polyesters Anti-Bacterial Agents Models, Theoretical Drug Liberation
Biofilms Candida albicans Quorum Sensing Candida glabrata Menthol

Classifications MeSH