Basic design of artificial membrane-less organelles using condensation-prone proteins in plant cells.


Journal

Communications biology
ISSN: 2399-3642
Titre abrégé: Commun Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101719179

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 14 07 2023
accepted: 18 10 2024
medline: 27 10 2024
pubmed: 27 10 2024
entrez: 27 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Membrane-less organelles, formed by the condensation of biomolecules, play a pivotal role in eukaryotes. Artificial membrane-less organelles and condensates are effective tools for the creation of new cellular functions. However, it is poorly understood how to control the properties that affect condensate function, particularly in plants. Here, we report the construction of model artificial condensates using the condensation-prone proteins OsJAZ2 and AtFCA in a transient assay using rice (Oryza sativa) cells, and how condensate properties, such as subcellular localization, protein mobility, and size can be altered. We showed that proteins of interest can be recruited to condensates using nanobodies or chemically induced dimerization. Furthermore, by combining two types of condensation-prone proteins, we demonstrated that artificial hybrid condensates with heterogeneous material properties could be constructed. Finally, we showed that modified artificial condensates can be constructed in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants. These results provide a framework for the basic design of synthetic membrane-less organelles in plants.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39462114
doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07102-8
pii: 10.1038/s42003-024-07102-8
doi:

Substances chimiques

Plant Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1396

Subventions

Organisme : MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
ID : JP22K05427
Organisme : MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
ID : JPMJSP2125

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Courchaine, E. M., Lu, A. & Neugebauer, K. M. Droplet organelles? EMBO J. 35, 1603–1612 (2016).
pubmed: 27357569 pmcid: 4969579 doi: 10.15252/embj.201593517
Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285–298 (2017).
pubmed: 28225081 pmcid: 7434221 doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.7
Shin, Y. & Brangwynne, C. P. Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease. Science 357, eaaf4382 (2017).
pubmed: 28935776 doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4382
Franzmann, T. M. et al. Phase separation of a yeast prion protein promotes cellular fitness. Science 359, eaao5654 (2018).
pubmed: 29301985 doi: 10.1126/science.aao5654
Pancsa, R., Schad, E., Tantos, A. & Tompa, P. Emergent functions of proteins in non-stoichiometric supramolecular assemblies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Proteins Proteom. 1867, 970–979 (2019).
pubmed: 30826453 doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2019.02.007
Bracha, D., Walls, M. T. & Brangwynne, C. P. Probing and engineering liquid-phase organelles. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1435–1445 (2019).
pubmed: 31792412 doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0341-6
Qian, Z. G., Huang, S. C. & Xia, X. X. Synthetic protein condensates for cellular and metabolic engineering. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 1330–1340 (2022).
pubmed: 36400990 doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01203-3
Reinkemeier, C. D., Girona, G. E. & Lemke, E. A. Designer membraneless organelles enable codon reassignment of selected mRNAs in eukaryotes. Science 363, eaaw2644 (2019).
pubmed: 30923194 pmcid: 7611745 doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2644
Schuster, B. S. et al. Controllable protein phase separation and modular recruitment to form responsive membraneless organelles. Nat. Commun. 9, 2985 (2018).
pubmed: 30061688 pmcid: 6065366 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05403-1
Garabedian, M. V. et al. Designer membraneless organelles sequester native factors for control of cell behavior. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 998–1007 (2021).
pubmed: 34341589 pmcid: 8387445 doi: 10.1038/s41589-021-00840-4
Dzuricky, M., Rogers, B. A., Shahid, A., Cremer, P. S. & Chilkoti, A. De novo engineering of intracellular condensates using artificial disordered proteins. Nat. Chem. 12, 814–825 (2020).
pubmed: 32747754 pmcid: 8281385 doi: 10.1038/s41557-020-0511-7
Dai, Y. et al. Programmable synthetic biomolecular condensates for cellular control. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 518–528 (2023).
pubmed: 36747054 pmcid: 10786170 doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01252-8
Baruch Leshem, A. et al. Biomolecular condensates formed by designer minimalistic peptides. Nat. Commun. 14, 421 (2023).
pubmed: 36702825 pmcid: 9879991 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36060-8
Patel, A. et al. A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the ALS protein FUS accelerated by disease mutation. Cell 162, 1066–1077 (2015).
pubmed: 26317470 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.047
Kato, M. et al. Cell-free formation of RNA granules: low complexity sequence domains form dynamic fibers within hydrogels. Cell 149, 753–767 (2012).
pubmed: 22579281 pmcid: 6347373 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.017
Hennig, S. et al. Prion-like domains in RNA binding proteins are essential for building subnuclear paraspeckles. J. Cell Biol. 210, 529–539 (2015).
pubmed: 26283796 pmcid: 4539981 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201504117
Lin, Y., Protter, D. S., Rosen, M. K. & Parker, R. Formation and maturation of phase-separated liquid droplets by RNA-binding proteins. Mol. Cell 60, 208–219 (2015).
pubmed: 26412307 pmcid: 4609299 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.08.018
Molliex, A. et al. Phase separation by low-complexity domains promotes stress granule assembly and drives pathological fibrillization. Cell 163, 123–133 (2015).
pubmed: 26406374 pmcid: 5149108 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.015
Hughes, M. P. et al. Atomic structures of low-complexity protein segments reveal kinked β sheets that assemble networks. Science 359, 698–701 (2018).
pubmed: 29439243 pmcid: 6192703 doi: 10.1126/science.aan6398
Alberti, S., Gladfelter, A. & Mittag, T. Considerations and challenges in studying liquid–liquid phase separation and biomolecular condensates. Cell 176, 419–434 (2019).
pubmed: 30682370 pmcid: 6445271 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035
Gomes, E. & Shorter, J. The molecular language of membraneless organelles. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 7115–7127 (2019).
pubmed: 30045872 doi: 10.1074/jbc.TM118.001192
Woodruff, J. B., Hyman, A. A. & Boke, E. Organization and function of non-dynamic biomolecular condensates. Trends Biochem. Sci. 43, 81–94 (2018).
pubmed: 29258725 doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.11.005
Emenecker, R. J., Holehouse, A. S. & Strader, L. C. Emerging roles for phase separation in plants. Dev. Cell 55, 69–83 (2020).
pubmed: 33049212 pmcid: 7577370 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.010
Bose, M., Lampe, M., Mahamid, J. & Ephrussi, A. Liquid-to-solid phase transition of Oskar ribonucleoprotein granules is essential for their function in Drosophila embryonic development. Cell 185, 1308–1324 (2022).
pubmed: 35325593 pmcid: 9042795 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.02.022
Wang, J. et al. A molecular grammar governing the driving forces for phase separation of prion-like RNA binding proteins. Cell 174, 688–699.e16 (2018).
pubmed: 29961577 pmcid: 6063760 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.006
Hastings, R. L. & Boeynaems, S. Designer condensates: a toolkit for the biomolecular architect. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 166837 (2021).
pubmed: 33539874 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166837
Banani, S. F. et al. Compositional control of phase-separated cellular bodies. Cell 166, 651–663 (2016).
pubmed: 27374333 pmcid: 4967043 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.010
Lyon, A. S., Peeples, W. B. & Rosen, M. K. A framework for understanding the functions of biomolecular condensates across scales. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 215–235 (2021).
pubmed: 33169001 doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00303-z
Hyman, A. A., Weber, C. A. & Jülicher, F. Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 39–58 (2014).
pubmed: 25288112 doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013325
Jawerth, L. et al. Protein condensates as aging Maxwell fluids. Science 370, 1317–1323 (2020).
pubmed: 33303613 doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4951
Yang, P. et al. G3BP1 is a tunable switch that triggers phase separation to assemble stress granules. Cell 181, 325–345.e28 (2020).
pubmed: 32302571 pmcid: 7448383 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.046
Yuan, F. et al. Membrane bending by protein phase separation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 118, e2017435118 (2021).
pubmed: 33688043 pmcid: 7980387 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017435118
Gouveia, B. et al. Capillary forces generated by biomolecular condensates. Nature 609, 255–264 (2022).
pubmed: 36071192 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05138-6
Zhang, H. The glassiness of hardening protein droplets. Science 370, 1271–1272 (2020).
pubmed: 33303604 doi: 10.1126/science.abe9745
Milovanovic, D. et al. A liquid phase of synapsin and lipid vesicles. Science 361, 604–607 (2018).
pubmed: 29976799 pmcid: 6191856 doi: 10.1126/science.aat5671
Zeng, M. et al. Reconstituted postsynaptic density as a molecular platform for understanding synapse formation and plasticity. Cell 174, 1172–1187.e16 (2018).
pubmed: 30078712 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.047
Su, X. et al. Phase separation of signaling molecules promotes T cell receptor signal transduction. Science 352, 595–599 (2016).
pubmed: 27056844 pmcid: 4892427 doi: 10.1126/science.aad9964
Wang, H. Y. et al. Coupling of protein condensates to ordered lipid domains determines functional membrane organization. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf6205 (2023).
pubmed: 37126554 pmcid: 10132753 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf6205
Schwayer, C. et al. Mechanosensation of tight junctions depends on ZO-1 phase separation and flow. Cell 179, 937–952.e18 (2019).
pubmed: 31675500 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.006
Beutel, O., Maraspini, R., Pombo-García, K., Martin-Lemaitre, C. & Honigmann, A. Phase separation of zonula occludens proteins drives formation of tight junctions. Cell 179, 923–936.e11 (2019).
pubmed: 31675499 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.011
Fujioka, Y. et al. Phase separation organizes the site of autophagosome formation. Nature 578, 301–305 (2020).
pubmed: 32025038 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1977-6
Day, K. J. et al. Liquid-like protein interactions catalyse assembly of endocytic vesicles. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 366–376 (2021).
pubmed: 33820972 pmcid: 8035231 doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00646-5
Dragwidge, J. M. & Van Damme, D. Protein phase separation in plant membrane biology: more than just a compartmentalization strategy. Plant Cell 35, 3162–3172 (2023).
pubmed: 37352127 pmcid: 10473209 doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad177
Kusumaatmaja, H., May, A. I. & Knorr, R. L. Intracellular wetting mediates contacts between liquid compartments and membrane-bound organelles. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202103175 (2021).
pubmed: 34427635 pmcid: 8404468 doi: 10.1083/jcb.202103175
Mangiarotti, A. et al. Wetting and complex remodeling of membranes by biomolecular condensates. Nat. Commun. 14, 2809 (2023).
pubmed: 37217523 pmcid: 10203268 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37955-2
Fang, X. et al. Arabidopsis FLL2 promotes liquid–liquid phase separation of polyadenylation complexes. Nature 569, 265–269 (2019).
pubmed: 31043738 pmcid: 6625965 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1165-8
Dorone, Y. et al. A prion-like protein regulator of seed germination undergoes hydration-dependent phase separation. Cell 184, 4284–4298 (2021).
pubmed: 34233164 pmcid: 8513799 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.009
Powers, S. K. et al. Nucleo-cytoplasmic partitioning of ARF proteins controls auxin responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell 76, 177–190 (2019).
pubmed: 31421981 pmcid: 6778021 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.044
Jung, J. H. et al. A prion-like domain in ELF3 functions as a thermosensor in Arabidopsis. Nature 585, 256–260 (2020).
pubmed: 32848244 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2644-7
Mo, W. et al. Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2 forms photobodies with TCP22 under blue light and regulates the circadian clock. Nat. Commun. 13, 2631 (2022).
pubmed: 35551190 pmcid: 9098493 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30231-9
van Dop, M. et al. DIX domain polymerization drives assembly of plant cell polarity complexes. Cell 180, 427–439.e12 (2020).
pubmed: 32004461 pmcid: 7042713 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.011
Dragwidge, J. M. et al. Biomolecular condensation orchestrates clathrin-mediated endocytosis in plants. Nat. Cell Biol. 26, 438–449 (2024).
pubmed: 38347182 doi: 10.1038/s41556-024-01354-6
Liu, C. et al. SEC14-like condensate phase transitions at plasma membranes regulate root growth in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002305 (2023).
pubmed: 37721949 pmcid: 10538751 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002305
Koja, Y. et al. Formation of subcellular compartments by condensation-prone protein OsJAZ2 in Oryza sativa and Nicotiana benthamiana leaf cells. Plant Cell Rep. 42, 269–286 (2023).
pubmed: 36449075
Chini, A., Fonseca, S., Chico, J. M., Fernández-Calvo, P. & Solano, R. The ZIM domain mediates homo- and heteromeric interactions between Arabidopsis JAZ proteins. Plant J. 59, 77–87 (2009).
pubmed: 19309455 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03852.x
Pauwels, L. & Goossens, A. The JAZ proteins: a crucial interface in the jasmonate signaling cascade. Plant Cell 23, 3089–3100 (2011).
pubmed: 21963667 pmcid: 3203442 doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.089300
Toda, Y. et al. RICE SALT SENSITIVE3 forms a ternary complex with JAZ and class-C bHLH factors and regulates jasmonate-induced gene expression and root cell elongation. Plant Cell 25, 1709–1725 (2013).
pubmed: 23715469 pmcid: 3694701 doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.112052
Shyu, C. et al. JAZ8 lacks a canonical degron and has an EAR motif that mediates transcriptional repression of jasmonate responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 536–550 (2012).
pubmed: 22327740 pmcid: 3315231 doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.093005
Hori, Y. et al. Overexpression of the JAZ factors with mutated Jas domains causes pleiotropic defects in rice spikelet development. Plant Signal Behav. 9, e970414 (2014).
pubmed: 25482801 pmcid: 4623050 doi: 10.4161/15592316.2014.970414
Ogawa, D. et al. RSS1 regulates the cell cycle and maintains meristematic activity under stress conditions in rice. Nat. Commun. 2, (2011).
Ogawa, D., Morita, H., Hattori, T. & Takeda, S. Molecular characterization of the rice protein RSS1 required for meristematic activity under stressful conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 61, 54–60 (2012).
pubmed: 23041461 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.09.006
Rothbauer, U. et al. Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies. Nat. Methods 3, 887–889 (2006).
pubmed: 17060912 doi: 10.1038/nmeth953
Choi, J., Chen, J., Schreiber, S. L. & Clardy, J. Structure of the FKBP12-rapamycin complex interacting with the binding domain of human FRAP. Science 273, 239–242 (1996).
pubmed: 8662507 doi: 10.1126/science.273.5272.239
Mikami, M., Toki, S. & Endo, M. Parameters affecting frequency of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated targeted mutagenesis in rice. Plant Cell Rep. 34, 1807–1815 (2015).
pubmed: 26134856 doi: 10.1007/s00299-015-1826-5
Lam, S. K. et al. Rice SCAMP1 defines clathrin-coated, trans-Golgi-located tubular-vesicular structures as an early endosome in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell 19, 296–319 (2007).
pubmed: 17209124 pmcid: 1820953 doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.045708
Cai, Y. et al. Multiple cytosolic and transmembrane determinants are required for the trafficking of SCAMP1 via an ER-Golgi-TGN-PM pathway. Plant J. 65, 882–896 (2011).
pubmed: 21251105 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04469.x
Tang, M. et al. The Nup98 homolog APIP12 targeted by the effector AvrPiz-t is involved in rice basal resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae. Rice 10, (2017).
Radu, A., Moore, M. S. & Blobel, G. The peptide repeat domain of nucleoporin Nup98 functions as a docking site in transport across the nuclear pore complex. Cell 81, 215–222 (1995).
pubmed: 7736573 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90331-3
Hulsmann, B. B., Labokha, A. A. & Gorlich, D. The permeability of reconstituted nuclear pores provides direct evidence for the selective phase model. Cell 150, 738–751 (2012).
pubmed: 22901806 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.019
Labokha, A. A. et al. Systematic analysis of barrier-forming FG hydrogels from Xenopus nuclear pore complexes. EMBO J. 32, 204–218 (2013).
pubmed: 23202855 doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.302
Taylor, N. O., Wei, M. T., Stone, H. A. & Brangwynne, C. P. Quantifying dynamics in phase-separated condensates using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biophys. J. 117, 1285–1300 (2019).
pubmed: 31540706 pmcid: 6818185 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.08.030
Wang, W. et al. A light- and calcium-gated transcription factor for imaging and manipulating activated neurons. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 864–871 (2017).
pubmed: 28650461 pmcid: 5595644 doi: 10.1038/nbt.3909
Schornack, S. et al. Protein mislocalization in plant cells using a GFP-binding chromobody. Plant J. 60, 744–754 (2009).
pubmed: 19686537 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03982.x
Schlatter, S., Senn, C. & Fussenegger, M. Modulation of translation-initiation in CHO-K1 cells by rapamycin-induced heterodimerization of engineered eIF4G fusion proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 83, 210–225 (2003).
pubmed: 12768627 doi: 10.1002/bit.10662
Huang, L. et al. DAXX represents a new type of protein-folding enabler. Nature 597, 132–137 (2021).
pubmed: 34408321 pmcid: 8485697 doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03824-5
Mahjoubi, H. et al. The wheat TdRL1 is the functional homolog of the rice RSS1 and promotes plant salt stress tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 37, 1625–1637 (2018).
pubmed: 30099611 doi: 10.1007/s00299-018-2333-2
Martin, E. W. et al. Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains. Science 367, 694–699 (2020).
pubmed: 32029630 pmcid: 7297187 doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8653
Holehouse, A. S., Ginell, G. M., Griffith, D. & Böke, E. Clustering of aromatic residues in prion-like domains can tune the formation, state, and organization of biomolecular condensates. Biochemistry 60, 3566–3581 (2021).
pubmed: 34784177 doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00465
Voorhees, P. W. Ostwald ripening of two-phase mixtures. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 22, 197–215 (1992).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ms.22.080192.001213
Kelley, F. M., Favetta, B., Regy, R. M., Mittal, J. & Schuster, B. S. Amphiphilic proteins coassemble into multiphasic condensates and act as biomolecular surfactants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2109967118 (2021).
pubmed: 34916288 pmcid: 8713756 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109967118
Feric, M. et al. Coexisting liquid phases underlie nucleolar subcompartments. Cell 165, 1686–1697 (2016).
pubmed: 27212236 pmcid: 5127388 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.047
Jain, S. et al. ATPase-modulated stress granules contain a diverse proteome and substructure. Cell 164, 487–498 (2016).
pubmed: 26777405 pmcid: 4733397 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.038
Guil, S., Long, J. C. & Caceres, J. F. hnRNP A1 relocalization to the stress granules reflects a role in the stress response. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 5744–5758 (2006).
pubmed: 16847328 pmcid: 1592774 doi: 10.1128/MCB.00224-06
Sanders, D. W. et al. Competing protein-RNA interaction networks control multiphase intracellular organization. Cell 181, 306–324.e28 (2020).
pubmed: 32302570 pmcid: 7816278 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.050
Kaur, T. et al. Sequence-encoded and composition-dependent protein-RNA interactions control multiphasic condensate morphologies. Nat. Commun. 12, 872 (2021).
pubmed: 33558506 pmcid: 7870978 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21089-4
Currie, S. L. et al. Quantitative reconstitution of yeast RNA processing bodies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2214064120 (2023).
pubmed: 36972455 pmcid: 10083542 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214064120
Shin, Y. Spatiotemporal control of intracellular phase transitions using light-activated optodroplet. Cell 168, 159–171 (2017).
pubmed: 28041848 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.054
Withers, J. et al. Transcription factor-dependent nuclear localization of a transcriptional repressor in jasmonate hormone signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 109, 20148–20153 (2012).
pubmed: 23169619 pmcid: 3523844 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210054109
Takeda, S. & Matsuoka, M. Genetic approaches to crop improvement: responding to environmental and population changes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 444–457 (2008).
pubmed: 18475268 doi: 10.1038/nrg2342
Clough, S. J. & Bent, A. F. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743 (1998).
pubmed: 10069079 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x
Nakagawa, T. et al. Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 104, 34–41 (2007).
pubmed: 17697981 doi: 10.1263/jbb.104.34
Motohashi, K. A simple and efficient seamless DNA cloning method using SLiCE from Escherichia coli laboratory strains and its application to SLiP site-directed mutagenesis. BMC Biotechnol. 15, 47 (2015).
pubmed: 26037246 pmcid: 4453199 doi: 10.1186/s12896-015-0162-8

Auteurs

Yoshito Koja (Y)

Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Takuya Arakawa (T)

Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Yusuke Yoritaka (Y)

Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Yu Joshima (Y)

Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Bioscience and Biotechnology Center, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Hazuki Kobayashi (H)

Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Kenta Toda (K)

Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Shin Takeda (S)

Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. takeda@agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Bioscience and Biotechnology Center, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. takeda@agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp.

Articles similaires

Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family
Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger
Genome Size Genome, Plant Magnoliopsida Evolution, Molecular Arabidopsis

Classifications MeSH