Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument.
Rehabilitation
Reproducibility of results
Sick leave
Surveys and questionnaires
Validation studies
Vocational
Journal
Journal of occupational rehabilitation
ISSN: 1573-3688
Titre abrégé: J Occup Rehabil
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9202814
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
8
6
2018
medline:
25
8
2020
entrez:
8
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of the present study was to translate and validate the Canadian Readiness for Return To Work instrument (RRTW-CA) into a Danish version (RRTWDK) by testing its test-retest and internal consistency reliability and its structural and construct validity. Cross-cultural adaptation of the six-staged RRTW-CA instrument was performed in a standardised, systematic five-step-procedure; forward translation, panel synthesis of the translation, back translation, consolidation and revision by researchers, and finally pre-testing. This RRTW-DK beta-version was tested for its psychometric properties by intra-class correlation coefficient and standard error of measurement (n = 114), Cronbach's alpha (n = 471), confirmatory factor analyses (n = 373), and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (n = 436) in sickness beneficiaries from a municipal employment agency and hospital wards. The original RRTW-CA stage structure could not be confirmed in the RRTWDK. The psychometric properties were thus inconclusive. The RRTW-DK cannot be recommended for use in the current version as the RRTW construct is questionable. The RRTW construct needs further exploration, preferably in a population that is homogeneous with regard to cause of sickness, disability duration and age.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29876726
doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9790-x
pii: 10.1007/s10926-018-9790-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
325-335Subventions
Organisme : The Danish Working Environment Research Fund
ID : 20-2013-09
Pays : International
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3152-60
pubmed: 11124731
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91
pubmed: 11124735
Am J Ind Med. 2001 Oct;40(4):464-84
pubmed: 11598995
J Occup Rehabil. 2002 Dec;12(4):233-56
pubmed: 12389476
Am Psychol. 2003 Jan;58(1):78-9
pubmed: 12674822
Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102-14
pubmed: 1329589
Br J Addict. 1992 Jun;87(6):825-8; discussion 833-5
pubmed: 1525523
BMJ. 2005 Apr 9;330(7495):802-3
pubmed: 15817531
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Sep;17(3):450-72
pubmed: 17701326
Prev Med. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74
pubmed: 18242667
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49
pubmed: 20169472
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:22
pubmed: 20298572
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45
pubmed: 20494804
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Aug;52(8):778-90
pubmed: 20657300
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Feb;51(2):230-42
pubmed: 21415023
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):371-80
pubmed: 23271500
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 03;(12):CD006237
pubmed: 25470301
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 25;(9):CD007569
pubmed: 26405010
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jul 1;42(4):338-45
pubmed: 27158861
Psychooncology. 2017 May;26(5):715-717
pubmed: 27478074
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Jun;28(2):332-345
pubmed: 28756480
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Aug;56(4):520-8
pubmed: 3198809
Addict Behav. 1985;10(4):395-406
pubmed: 4091072
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5
pubmed: 6863699
Qual Life Res. 1995 Aug;4(4):293-307
pubmed: 7550178
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 1;19(9):1011-20
pubmed: 8029734
Health Psychol. 1994 Jan;13(1):39-46
pubmed: 8168470
BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):41-2
pubmed: 8664775
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Dec 15;21(24):2918-29
pubmed: 9112717