Beyond the panel: preconception screening in consanguineous couples using the TruSight One "clinical exome".
Consanguineous
Exome
Genomic screening
Preconception screening
Recessive disorders
Journal
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
ISSN: 1530-0366
Titre abrégé: Genet Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9815831
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
10
01
2018
accepted:
31
05
2018
pubmed:
3
7
2018
medline:
16
7
2019
entrez:
3
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To provide proof of concept by broadening preconception screening beyond targeted testing to inform reproductive risk in consanguineous couples. Consanguineous couples were screened for autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders using the TruSight One panel of 4,813 genes associated with human disease. We recruited 22 couples, of whom 15 elected to have sequencing. We found four couples to be at risk of autosomal recessive disorders, including one with a child affected by Poretti-Boltshauser syndrome (a diagnosis not made prior to the study) and another previously known to carry a β-globin variant. Two couples were found to carry variants unrelated to known family history. These variants were in the genes C5orf42 (associated with Joubert syndrome and orofaciodigital syndrome) and GYS2 (associated with glycogen synthase deficiency). One known variant was not detected-a single exon deletion in FAM20C. We would not expect to identify this variant with the methodology employed. Of the four variants identified, only the β-globin variant would have been found using available commercial preconception screening panels. Preconception screening of consanguineous couples for recessive and X-linked disorders using genomic sequencing is practicable, and is likely to detect many more at-risk couples than any targeted panel could achieve. A couples-based approach greatly reduces the associated analysis and counselling burden.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29961766
doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0082-9
pii: S1098-3600(21)01013-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
608-612Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Sulem P, Helgason H, Oddson A, et al. Identification of a large set of rare complete human knockouts. Nat Genet 2015;47:448–452.
doi: 10.1038/ng.3243
Angastiniotis M, Kyriakidou S, Hadjiminas M. How thalassaemia was controlled in Cyprus. World Health Forum 1986;7:291–297.
Bach G, Tomczak J, Risch N, et al. Tay–Sachs screening in the Jewish Ashkenazi population: DNA testing is the preferred procedure. Am J Med Genet 2001;99:70–75.
doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20010215)99:1<70::AID-AJMG1120>3.0.CO;2-0
Xue Y, Ankala A, Wilcox W, et al. Solving the molecular diagnostic testing conundrum for Mendelian disorders in the era of next-generation sequencing: single-gene, gene panel, or exome/genome sequencing. Genet Med 2014;17:444–451.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.122
Lacaze P, Millis N, Fookes M, et al. Rare disease registries: a call to action. Int Med J 2017;47:1075–1079.
doi: 10.1111/imj.13528
Hamamy H, Antonarakis SE, Cavalli-Sforza LL, et al. Consanguineous marriages, pearls and perils: Geneva International Consanguinity Workshop Report. Genet Med 2011;13:841–847.
doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318217477f
Bittles AH. Consanguinity and Morbidity in Early Life. Consanguinity in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. 136–161.
Bittles A. Consanguinity, genetic drift, and genetic diseases in populations with reduced numbers of founders. In: Speicher M, Motulsky A, Antonarakis S, editors. Vogel and Motulsky’s Human Genetics. Berlin: Springer; 2010. 507–528.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-37654-5_19
Xue Y, Chen Y, Ayub O, et al. Deleterious- and disease-allele prevalence in health individuals: insights from current predictions, mutation databases, and population-scale resequencing. Am J Hum Genet 2012;91:1022–1032.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.015
Paila U, Chapman BA, Kirchner R, et al. GEMINI: integrative exploration of genetic variation and genome annotations. PLoS Comput Biol 2013;9:e1003153.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003153
Srour M, Schwartzentruber J, Hamdan FF, et al. Mutations in C5ORF42 cause Joubert Syndrome in the French Canadian population. Am J Hum Genet 2012;90:693–700.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.02.011
Lopez E, Thauvin-Robinet C, Reversade B, et al. C5orf42 is the major gene responsible for OFD syndrome type VI. Hum Genet 2014;133:367–377.
doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1385-1
Wentzensen I, Johnston J, Keppler-Noreuil K, et al. Exome sequencing identifies novel mutations in c5orf42 in patients with Joubert syndrome with oral–facial–digital anomalies. Hum Genome Var 2015;2:1–3.
doi: 10.1038/hgv.2015.45
Weinstein DA, Correia CE, Saunders AC, et al. Hepatic glycogen synthase deficiency: an infrequently recognized cause of ketotic hypoglycaemia. Mol Genet Metab 2006;87:284–288.
doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2005.10.006
Orho M, Bosshard NU, Buist NR, et al. Mutations in the liver glycogen synthase gene in children with hypoglycaemia due to glycogen storage disease type 0. J Clin Invest 1998;102:507–515.
doi: 10.1172/JCI2890
Al-Gazali L, Ali BR Mutations of a country: a mutation review of single gene disorders in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Hum Mutat 2010;31:505–520.
doi: 10.1002/humu.21232
Poretti A, Hausler M, von Moers A, et al. Ataxia, intellectual disability, and ocular apraxia with cerebellar cysts: a new disease? Cerebellum 2014;13:79–88.
doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0521-8
Aldinger KA, Mosca SJ, Tetreault M, et al. Mutations in LAMA1 cause cerebellar dysplasia and cysts with and without retinal dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet 2014;95:227–234.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.07.007
Grody WW, Thompson BH, Gregg AR, et al. ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening. Genet Med 2013;15:482–483.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.47
Henneman L, Borry P, Chokoshvili D, et al. Responsible implantation of expanded carrier screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2016;24:e1–e12.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.271
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Carrier screening in the age of genomic medicine. Committee Opinion No. 690. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:e35–e40.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001951
Corry PC Consanguinity and the prevalence patterns of inherited disease in the UK Pakistani community. Hum Hered 2014;77:207–216.
doi: 10.1159/000362598