Clinical genome sequencing in an unbiased pediatric cohort.
Clinical validation
Diagnostics
Genome sequencing
Insurance reimbursement
Next-generation sequencing
Journal
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
ISSN: 1530-0366
Titre abrégé: Genet Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9815831
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
15
03
2018
accepted:
18
05
2018
pubmed:
17
7
2018
medline:
4
7
2019
entrez:
17
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We report for the first time, the use of clinical genome sequencing (GS) in an unbiased pediatric cohort. We describe the clinical validation, patient metrics, ordering patterns, results, reimbursement, and physician retrieval of results for the first consecutive 80 cases. Clinical GS was performed for both inpatients and outpatients undergoing etiologic evaluations. Results were reported in the electronic medical record. Evidence of report retrieval by clinicians and whether interpretation was concordant with laboratory report was obtained through retrospective chart review. Twenty definitive diagnoses were made in 19 patients (24%; n = 80). Except for two partial gene deletions, all diagnostic variants would have been detectable by our exome methods. Surprisingly, there was no documentation of communication of results to the family in the medical record for 17.5% of patients, and in 7.5%, physician and laboratory interpretations were discordant. Average insurance reimbursement was 30.2%, with yield for commercial payers significantly higher, at 54.1%. The detection rate of GS is equivalent and potentially superior to exome sequencing (ES). Reimbursement rates were variable but overall satisfactory for commercial insurers, and poor for government entities. In addition, we identify opportunities for improvement in the communication of results to families, likely translatable to other tests and other institutions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30008475
doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0075-8
pii: S1098-3600(21)04640-2
pmc: PMC6752301
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
303-310Références
Soden SE, Saunders CJ, Willig LK, et al. Effectiveness of exome and genome sequencing guided by acuity of illness for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:265ra168.
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010076
Saunders CJ, Miller NA, Soden SE, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:154ra135.
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004041
Kohler S, Vasilevsky NA, Engelstad M, et al. The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2017. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D865–D876.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1039
Shen F, Wang L, Liu H. Phenotypic analysis of clinical narratives using Human Phenotype Ontology. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:581–5.
pubmed: 29295162
Willig LK, Petrikin JE, Smith LD, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for identification of Mendelian disorders in critically ill infants: a retrospective analysis of diagnostic and clinical findings. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3:377–87.
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00139-3
Petrikin JE, Cakici JA, Clark MM, et al. The NSIGHT1-randomized controlled trial: rapid whole-genome sequencing for accelerated etiologic diagnosis in critically ill infants. NPJ Genom Med. 2018;3:6.
doi: 10.1038/s41525-018-0045-8
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30
Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:565–74.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.73
Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ, et al. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SFv2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017;19:249–55.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.190
Ahmed AA, Skaria P, Safina NP, et al. Arthrogryposis and pterygia as lethal end manifestations of genetically defined congenital myopathies. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176:359–67.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38577
Ravenscroft G, Di Donato N, Hahn G, et al. Recurrent de novo BICD2 mutation associated with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita and bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria. Neuromuscul Disord. 2016;26:744–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2016.09.009
Storbeck M, Horsberg Eriksen B, Unger A, et al. Phenotypic extremes of BICD2-opathies: from lethal, congenital muscular atrophy with arthrogryposis to asymptomatic with subclinical features. Eur J Hum Genet . 2017;25:1040–8.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.98
Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG, et al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1502–11.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306555
Lee H, Deignan JL, Dorrani N, et al. Clinical exome sequencing for genetic identification of rare Mendelian disorders. JAMA. 2014;312:1880–7.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.14604
Valencia CA, Husami A, Holle J, et al. Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of whole exome sequencing as a diagnostic tool: a pediatric center’s experience. Front Pediatr. 2015;3:67.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2015.00067
Lionel AC, Costain G, Monfared N, et al. Improved diagnostic yield compared with targeted gene sequencing panels suggests a role for whole-genome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test. Genet Med. 2017;20:435–43.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.119
Powis Z, Farwell KD, Alamillo CL, et al. Diagnostic exome sequencing for patients with a family history of consanguinity: over 38% of positive results are not autosomal recessive pattern. J Hum Genet. 2016;61:173–5.
doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.125
Charng WL, Karaca E, Coban Akdemir Z, et al. Exome sequencing in mostly consanguineous Arab families with neurologic disease provides a high potential molecular diagnosis rate. BMC Med Genomics. 2016;9:42.
doi: 10.1186/s12920-016-0208-3
Meng L, Pammi M, Saronwala A, et al. Use of exome sequencing for infants in intensive care units: ascertainment of severe single-gene disorders and effect on medical management. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:e173438.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438
Bourchany A, Thauvin-Robinet C, Lehalle D, et al. Reducing diagnostic turnaround times of exome sequencing for families requiring timely diagnoses. Eur J Med Genet. 2017;60:595–604.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2017.08.011
Costain G, Jobling R, Walker S, et al. Periodic reanalysis of whole-genome sequencing data enhances the diagnostic advantage over standard clinical genetic testing. Eur J Hum Genet . 2018;26:740–4.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0114-6
Tan TY, Dillon OJ, Stark Z, et al. Diagnostic impact and cost-effectiveness of whole-exome sequencing for ambulant children with suspected monogenic conditions. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:855–62.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1755
van Diemen CC, Kerstjens-Frederikse WS, Bergman KA, et al. Rapid targeted genomics in critically ill newborns. Pediatrics. 2017;140:1–11.