The American Society for Radiation Oncology 2017 Radiation Oncologist Workforce Study.


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 03 2019
Historique:
received: 13 08 2018
revised: 10 10 2018
accepted: 17 10 2018
pubmed: 28 10 2018
medline: 4 9 2019
entrez: 28 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this study is to report the American Society for Radiation Oncology 2017 radiation oncologist (RO) workforce survey results; identify demographic, technology utilization, and employment trends; and assess the profession's ability to meet patients' needs, offer job satisfaction, and attract high-caliber trainees. In spring 2017, the American Society for Radiation Oncology distributed an online survey to 3856 US RO members. The questionnaire was patterned after the 2012 workforce survey for trend analysis. The 31% response rate yielded 1174 individual responses (726 practices) for analysis. ROs' mean age was 50.9 years. Compared to 2012, female representation (28.9%) increased and white representation (69.8%) dropped. The proportion in rural practice (12.6%) decreased, whereas the number of suburban ROs (40.6%) increased and urban ROs (46.8%) remained high. Most ROs worked full-time, averaging 51.4 h/wk. Stereotactic body radiation therapy, cone beam computed tomography, and magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography-computed tomography fusion utilization increased, whereas low-dose-rate brachytherapy decreased by >15 percentage points. Hypofractionation utilization was 95.3% and was highest in academic/university systems and lowest in private solo practices (P < .001). More respondents were concerned about an RO oversupply rather than shortage. ROs reported 250 consults (median) and 20 on-treatment patients (median) in 2016 and greater time allocation to electronic health record management compared with 3 years earlier. Approximately 15% of ROs reported job vacancies, which were more prevalent in urban practices and academic/university systems. ROs were employed by academic/university systems, private practices, and nonacademic hospitals in a respective ratio of 2:2:1. Comparison with 2012 survey findings showed a shift from private practice toward academic/university systems and nonacademic hospitals. Compensation was predominantly productivity-based at private practices and a fixed salary or a base salary at academic/university systems and nonacademic hospitals. Practice merger/buyout was the lead reason for ROs to change employers. Since 2012, race and gender gaps narrowed, but geographic disparities persisted, with ROs gravitating toward resource-rich suburban and urban locations over rural practices. The workforce has shifted from predominantly private practice to more equal balance with academic/university systems. These findings reflect the current US RO landscape and serve to underscore the need for collective action to ensure equitable RO care for all patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30367907
pii: S0360-3016(18)33907-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.10.020
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

547-556

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Claire Y Fung (CY)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Erli Chen (E)

Cheshire Medical Center, Keene, New Hampshire.

Neha Vapiwala (N)

University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Surjeet Pohar (S)

Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Daniel Trifiletti (D)

Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

Minh-Tam Truong (MT)

Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

George Uschold (G)

University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

Jessica Schuster (J)

University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin.

Akshar Patel (A)

Chesapeake Oncology Hematology Associates, Glen Burnie, Maryland.

Ashesh Jani (A)

Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Pranshu Mohindra (P)

University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.

Tim Sanders (T)

American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia.

Liz Gardner (L)

American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia.

Anna Arnone (A)

American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia. Electronic address: anna.arnone@astro.org.

Trevor Royce (T)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH