Diagnostic accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes of heart failure in an administrative database.
Administrative Claims, Healthcare
/ statistics & numerical data
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Data Accuracy
Databases, Factual
/ statistics & numerical data
Diagnostic Errors
/ statistics & numerical data
Electronic Health Records
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
France
/ epidemiology
Heart Failure
/ diagnosis
Hospitals, University
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Incidence
International Classification of Diseases
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Discharge Summaries
/ statistics & numerical data
Predictive Value of Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
ICD-10
accuracy
heart failure
pharmacoepidemiology
positive predictive value
sensitivity
validation study
Journal
Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
ISSN: 1099-1557
Titre abrégé: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9208369
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
23
11
2017
revised:
14
09
2018
accepted:
27
09
2018
pubmed:
6
11
2018
medline:
24
3
2020
entrez:
6
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Heart failure (HF) is a common, serious, and still poorly known illness, which might benefit from studies in claims databases. However, to provide reliable estimates, HF patients must be adequately identified. This validation study aimed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes I50.x, heart failure, in the French hospital discharge diagnoses database. This study was performed in two university hospitals, comparing recorded discharge diagnoses and electronic health records (EHRs). Patients with discharge ICD-10 codes 150.x were randomly selected. Their EHRs were reviewed to classify HF diagnosis as definite, potential, or miscoded based on the European Society of Cardiology diagnostic criteria, from which the codes' positive predictive value (PPV) was computed. To estimate sensitivity, patients with an EHR HF diagnosis were identified, and the presence of the I50.x codes was sought for in the hospital discharge database. Two hundred possible cases of HF were selected from the hospital discharge database, and 229 patients with an HF diagnosis were identified from the EHR. The PPV of I50.x codes was 60.5% (95% CI, 53.7%-67.3%) for definite HF and 88.0% (95% CI, 83.5%-92.5%) for definite/potential HF. The sensitivity of I50.x codes was 64.2% (95% CI, 58.0%-70.4%). PPV results were similar in both hospitals; sensitivity depended on the source of EHR: Departments of cardiology had a higher sensitivity than had nonspecialized wards. Diagnosis codes I50.x in discharge summary databases accurately identify patients with HF but fail to capture some of them.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
194-200Informations de copyright
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.