Long-term safety and efficacy of antimuscarinic add-on therapy in patients with overactive bladder who had a suboptimal response to mirabegron monotherapy: A multicenter, randomized study in Japan (MILAI II study).
Acetanilides
/ administration & dosage
Adrenergic beta-3 Receptor Agonists
/ administration & dosage
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Benzilates
/ administration & dosage
Blood Pressure
/ drug effects
Constipation
/ chemically induced
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Imidazoles
/ administration & dosage
Japan
Male
Middle Aged
Muscarinic Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Nasopharyngitis
/ chemically induced
Severity of Illness Index
Solifenacin Succinate
/ administration & dosage
Thiazoles
/ administration & dosage
Time Factors
Tolterodine Tartrate
/ administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder, Overactive
/ complications
Urinary Incontinence
/ diagnosis
Xerostomia
/ chemically induced
antimuscarinic therapy
combination therapy
mirabegron
overactive bladder
β3-adrenoreceptor agonist
Journal
International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association
ISSN: 1442-2042
Titre abrégé: Int J Urol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9440237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
04
07
2018
accepted:
15
10
2018
pubmed:
15
12
2018
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
15
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the long-term safety (primary objective) and efficacy (secondary objective) of antimuscarinic add-on therapy in patients receiving mirabegron. During a 2-week screening period, patients (aged ≥20 years, mirabegron treatment for ≥6 weeks, residual overactive bladder symptoms) received mirabegron 50 mg once daily. These patients were subsequently randomized to 52 weeks' treatment with mirabegron 50 mg/day plus an antimuscarinic (solifenacin 5 mg, propiverine 20 mg, imidafenacin 0.2 mg, or tolterodine 4 mg) with the potential to double the antimuscarinic dose (except for tolterodine) at week 8. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms, post-void residual volume, and laboratory evaluations. Efficacy was assessed using changes from baseline in overactive bladder symptom score total score; overactive bladder questionnaire short form score; micturitions, urgency episodes, urinary incontinence episodes, and urgency urinary incontinence episodes/24 h; mean volume voided per micturition; and number of night-time micturitions. Overall, 80.2% of patients (88.1% women, mean age 65 years) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, with similar rates for all treatments. The adverse events most commonly reported were dry mouth, nasopharyngitis, and constipation. No marked change was observed in systolic or diastolic blood pressure for any treatment, although pulse rate increased slightly in the mirabegron and propiverine, and mirabegron and tolterodine groups. For all treatments, significant improvements were observed in all efficacy parameters, including overactive bladder symptom score total and questionnaire short form scores. Antimuscarinic add-on therapy is well tolerated and effective after initial treatment with mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder symptoms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30548692
doi: 10.1111/iju.13868
pmc: PMC7379522
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acetanilides
0
Adrenergic beta-3 Receptor Agonists
0
Benzilates
0
Imidazoles
0
Muscarinic Antagonists
0
Thiazoles
0
propiverine
468GE2241L
Tolterodine Tartrate
5T619TQR3R
Solifenacin Succinate
KKA5DLD701
mirabegron
MVR3JL3B2V
imidafenacin
XJR8Y07LJO
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
342-352Subventions
Organisme : Astellas Pharma Inc.
Pays : International
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association.
Références
Eur Urol. 2008 Sep;54(3):543-62
pubmed: 18599186
BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1388-95
pubmed: 18454794
World J Urol. 2014 Dec;32(6):1565-72
pubmed: 24458878
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):577-88
pubmed: 24612659
Int J Urol. 2009 May;16(5):499-506
pubmed: 19389083
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116(4):612-22
pubmed: 25639296
Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):283-95
pubmed: 23182126
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Jul;58(4):261-266
pubmed: 28681036
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019 Jan;11(1):14-23
pubmed: 28762672
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):562-575
pubmed: 28418102
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 May;71(5):
pubmed: 28419650
Int J Urol. 2008 Oct;15(11):986-91
pubmed: 18761536
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):389-399
pubmed: 28196724
J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1572-80
pubmed: 25623739
Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Apr;36(4):1097-1103
pubmed: 27265880
J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1388-95
pubmed: 23079373
Int J Urol. 2005 May;12(5):456-64
pubmed: 15948744
Int J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(10):960-7
pubmed: 25092441
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2018 May;10(2):122-130
pubmed: 27860325
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 May;321(2):642-7
pubmed: 17293563
J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):627-32; discussion 632
pubmed: 16813906
Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):768-73
pubmed: 21855969
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2016 Jan;8(1):5-29
pubmed: 26789539
Int J Urol. 2016 Dec;23(12):1016-1023
pubmed: 27686226
Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Jun;33(5):622-4
pubmed: 24838519
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):136-145
pubmed: 26965560
Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):112-5
pubmed: 19693952