Lichen chemistry is concordant with multilocus gene genealogy in the genus Cetrelia (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota).

Character evolution Lichenized fungi Molecular phylogeny Secondary metabolites Species delimitation

Journal

Fungal biology
ISSN: 1878-6146
Titre abrégé: Fungal Biol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101524465

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 08 05 2018
revised: 02 11 2018
accepted: 22 11 2018
entrez: 3 2 2019
pubmed: 3 2 2019
medline: 5 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The lichen genus Cetrelia represents a taxonomically interesting case where morphologically almost uniform populations differ considerably from each other chemically. Similar variation is not uncommon among lichenized fungi, but it is disputable whether such populations should be considered entities at the species level. Species boundaries in Cetrelia are traditionally delimited either as solely based on morphology or as combinations of morpho- and chemotypes. A dataset of four nuclear markers (ITS, IGS, Mcm7, RPB1) from 62 specimens, representing ten Cetrelia species, was analysed within Bayesian and maximum likelihood frameworks. Analyses recovered a well-resolved phylogeny where the traditional species generally were monophyletic, with the exception of Cetrelia chicitae and Cetrelia pseudolivetorum. Species delimitation analyses supported the distinction of 15 groups within the studied Cetrelia taxa, dividing three traditionally identified species into some species candidates. Chemotypes, distinguished according to the major medullary substance, clearly correlated with clades recovered within Cetrelia, while samples with the same reproductive mode were dispersed throughout the phylogenetic tree. Consequently, delimiting Cetrelia species based only on reproductive morphology is not supported phylogenetically. Character analyses suggest that chemical characters have been more consistent compared to reproductive mode and indicate that metabolite evolution in Cetrelia towards more complex substances is probable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30709518
pii: S1878-6146(18)30406-9
doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2018.11.013
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA, Fungal 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

125-139

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Kristiina Mark (K)

Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu 51005, Estonia; Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, Tartu 51014, Estonia.

Tiina Randlane (T)

Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu 51005, Estonia. Electronic address: tiina.randlane@ut.ee.

Göran Thor (G)

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Jae-Seoun Hur (JS)

Korean Lichen Research Institute, Sunchon National University, 255 Jungang-Ro, South Korea.

Walter Obermayer (W)

Karl-Franzens-Universität, Graz, Austria.

Andres Saag (A)

Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu 51005, Estonia.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Animals Hemiptera Insect Proteins Phylogeny Insecticides
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family

Classifications MeSH