The role of fruit heteromorphism in the naturalization of Asteraceae.
Alien species
Asteraceae
Compositae
dispersal
fruit heteromorphism
heterocarpy
invasiveness
monocarpy
naturalization
non-native species
seed heteromorphism
Journal
Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 06 2019
24 06 2019
Historique:
received:
29
10
2018
accepted:
10
01
2019
pubmed:
5
2
2019
medline:
23
2
2020
entrez:
5
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fruit heteromorphism is considered to be a bet-hedging strategy to cope with spatially or temporally heterogeneous environments. The different behaviours of the fruit morphs of the same species might also be beneficial during naturalization, once the species has been introduced to a new range. Yet, no study to date has tested the association between fruit heteromorphism and global-scale naturalization success for a large set of plant species. We compiled two large datasets on fruit heteromorphism in Asteraceae. One dataset was on native species in Central Europe (n = 321) and the other was on species frequently planted as ornamentals (n = 584). Using phylogenetic linear and logistic regressions, we tested whether heteromorphic species are more likely to naturalize outside their native range, and in more regions of the world than monomorphic species. We also tested whether the effect of heteromorphism is modulated by life history and height of the species. We show that heteromorphic species were more likely to naturalize outside their native range. However, among the naturalized species, heteromorphic and monomorphic species did not differ in the number of world regions where they became naturalized. A short life span and tall stature both promoted naturalization success and, when life history and height were included in the models, the effect of fruit heteromorphism on the ability to naturalize became non-significant. Nevertheless, among tall plants, heteromorphic ornamental species were significantly more likely to become naturalized in general and in more regions than monomorphic species. Our results provide evidence that in Asteraceae the production of heteromorphic fruits is associated with naturalization success. It appears, however, that not fruit heteromorphism per se, but a successful combination of other biological traits in fruit heteromorphic species, namely short life span and tall stature, contributes to their naturalization success.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Fruit heteromorphism is considered to be a bet-hedging strategy to cope with spatially or temporally heterogeneous environments. The different behaviours of the fruit morphs of the same species might also be beneficial during naturalization, once the species has been introduced to a new range. Yet, no study to date has tested the association between fruit heteromorphism and global-scale naturalization success for a large set of plant species.
METHODS
We compiled two large datasets on fruit heteromorphism in Asteraceae. One dataset was on native species in Central Europe (n = 321) and the other was on species frequently planted as ornamentals (n = 584). Using phylogenetic linear and logistic regressions, we tested whether heteromorphic species are more likely to naturalize outside their native range, and in more regions of the world than monomorphic species. We also tested whether the effect of heteromorphism is modulated by life history and height of the species.
KEY RESULTS
We show that heteromorphic species were more likely to naturalize outside their native range. However, among the naturalized species, heteromorphic and monomorphic species did not differ in the number of world regions where they became naturalized. A short life span and tall stature both promoted naturalization success and, when life history and height were included in the models, the effect of fruit heteromorphism on the ability to naturalize became non-significant. Nevertheless, among tall plants, heteromorphic ornamental species were significantly more likely to become naturalized in general and in more regions than monomorphic species.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results provide evidence that in Asteraceae the production of heteromorphic fruits is associated with naturalization success. It appears, however, that not fruit heteromorphism per se, but a successful combination of other biological traits in fruit heteromorphic species, namely short life span and tall stature, contributes to their naturalization success.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30715141
pii: 5306003
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz012
pmc: PMC6589514
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1043-1052Subventions
Organisme : Austrian Science Fund FWF
ID : I 3757
Pays : Austria
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Conserv Biol. 2007 Feb;21(1):224-31
pubmed: 17298528
Syst Biol. 2019 Mar 1;68(2):234-251
pubmed: 30239975
Nat Commun. 2016 Oct 31;7:13313
pubmed: 27796365
Ecology. 2015 Mar;96(3):762-74
pubmed: 26236872
New Phytol. 2016 Apr;210(1):356-65
pubmed: 26555320
Ann Bot. 2007 Aug;100(2):305-13
pubmed: 17575284
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 11;105(10):3796-9
pubmed: 18316722
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Aug;93(3):1421-1437
pubmed: 29504240
Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep 15;6(20):7188-7198
pubmed: 28725391
Oecologia. 2002 Aug;132(4):492-500
pubmed: 28547634
Nature. 2015 Sep 3;525(7567):100-3
pubmed: 26287466
Ecol Lett. 2018 Sep;21(9):1380-1389
pubmed: 29974602
PLoS One. 2016 May 17;11(5):e0155547
pubmed: 27187616
Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(6):1189-97
pubmed: 17901060
Syst Biol. 2014 May;63(3):397-408
pubmed: 24500037
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0176455
pubmed: 28445514
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 26;114(52):13756-13761
pubmed: 29203679
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Jul;26(7):333-9
pubmed: 21601306
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 23;10(4):e0123634
pubmed: 25906399
Conserv Biol. 2008 Apr;22(2):308-17
pubmed: 18261149
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2015 Nov;17(6):1203-9
pubmed: 26206119
New Phytol. 2013 Nov;200(3):615-33
pubmed: 23879193
New Phytol. 2012 Oct;196(2):383-396
pubmed: 22943470
Conserv Biol. 2010 Aug;24(4):1042-51
pubmed: 20184650
Ecol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;13(8):947-58
pubmed: 20576028
Am J Bot. 2018 Mar;105(3):302-314
pubmed: 29746720