The impact of cytogenetics on duration of response and overall survival in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (long-term follow-up results from BSBMT/UKMF Myeloma X Relapse [Intensive]): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
/ therapeutic use
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14
/ genetics
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16
/ genetics
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17
/ genetics
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4
/ genetics
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
/ statistics & numerical data
Combined Modality Therapy
Cyclophosphamide
/ therapeutic use
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
/ statistics & numerical data
Multiple Myeloma
/ drug therapy
Proportional Hazards Models
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ statistics & numerical data
Salvage Therapy
Sequence Deletion
Translocation, Genetic
Transplantation, Autologous
cytogenetics
duration of response
overall survival
relapsed multiple myeloma
salvage ASCT
Journal
British journal of haematology
ISSN: 1365-2141
Titre abrégé: Br J Haematol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372544
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
09
10
2018
accepted:
11
12
2018
pubmed:
8
2
2019
medline:
2
5
2020
entrez:
8
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Myeloma X trial (ISCRTN60123120) registered patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Participants were randomised between salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or weekly cyclophosphamide following re-induction therapy. Cytogenetic analysis performed at trial registration defined t(4;14), t(14;16) and del(17p) as high-risk. The effect of cytogenetics on time to progression (TTP) and overall survival was investigated. At 76 months median follow-up, ASCT improved TTP compared to cyclophosphamide (19 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 16-26) vs. 11 months (9-12), hazard ratio [HR]: 0·40, 95% CI: 0·29-0·56, P < 0·001), on which the presence of any single high-risk lesion had a detrimental impact [likelihood ratio test (LRT): P = 0·011]. ASCT also improved OS [67 months (95% CI 59-not reached) vs. 55 months (44-67), HR: 0·64, 95% CI: 0·42-0·99, P = 0·0435], with evidence of a detrimental impact with MYC rearrangement (LRT: P = 0·021). Twenty-one (24·7%) cyclophosphamide patients received an ASCT post-trial, median OS was not reached (95% CI: 39-not reached) for these participants compared to 31 months (22-39), in those who did not receive a post-trial ASCT. The analysis further supports the benefit of salvage ASCT, which may still be beneficial after second relapse in surviving patients. There is evidence that this benefit reduces in cytogenetic high-risk patients, highlighting the need for targeted study in this patient group.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30729512
doi: 10.1111/bjh.15782
pmc: PMC6519200
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
0
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
450-467Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 7264
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Stat Med. 1999 Oct 15;18(19):2617-34
pubmed: 10495460
Leukemia. 2006 Sep;20(9):1467-73
pubmed: 16855634
Haematologica. 2010 Jul;95(7):1221-5
pubmed: 20410185
Leukemia. 2012 Feb;26(2):349-55
pubmed: 21836613
Haematologica. 2012 Aug;97(8):1272-7
pubmed: 22371180
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Sep 1;19(17):4634-7
pubmed: 23857603
Leukemia. 2014 Feb;28(2):258-68
pubmed: 23868105
Pharm Stat. 2013 Nov-Dec;12(6):348-57
pubmed: 24136868
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jul;15(8):874-85
pubmed: 24948586
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 8;372(2):142-52
pubmed: 25482145
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 13;373(7):621-31
pubmed: 26035255
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 10;33(26):2863-9
pubmed: 26240224
Blood. 2016 Jun 16;127(24):2955-62
pubmed: 27002115
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1621-34
pubmed: 27119237
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Jul;3(7):e340-51
pubmed: 27374467
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):28-35
pubmed: 27632282
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 6;375(14):1319-1331
pubmed: 27705267
Haematologica. 2017 Aug;102(8):1432-1438
pubmed: 28495913
Leukemia. 2018 Jan;32(1):102-110
pubmed: 28584253
Leukemia. 2018 Jun;32(6):1295-1306
pubmed: 29467490