Engineering the acceptor substrate specificity in the xyloglucan endotransglycosylase TmXET6.3 from nasturtium seeds (Tropaeolum majus L.).
Amino Acid Sequence
Base Sequence
DNA, Complementary
/ genetics
Germination
Glycosylation
Glycosyltransferases
/ chemistry
Models, Molecular
Petroselinum
/ enzymology
Phylogeny
Plant Proteins
/ chemistry
Protein Engineering
Seeds
/ enzymology
Structural Homology, Protein
Substrate Specificity
Tropaeolum
/ enzymology
Bioinformatics
GH16 family
Homo- and hetero-transglycosylation
Protein molecular modelling
Site-directed mutagenesis
Journal
Plant molecular biology
ISSN: 1573-5028
Titre abrégé: Plant Mol Biol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9106343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
14
06
2018
accepted:
28
02
2019
pubmed:
15
3
2019
medline:
28
5
2019
entrez:
15
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The knowledge of substrate specificity of XET enzymes is important for the general understanding of metabolic pathways to challenge the established notion that these enzymes operate uniquely on cellulose-xyloglucan networks. Xyloglucan xyloglucosyl transferases (XETs) (EC 2.4.1.207) play a central role in loosening and re-arranging the cellulose-xyloglucan network, which is assumed to be the primary load-bearing structural component of plant cell walls. The sequence of mature TmXET6.3 from Tropaeolum majus (280 residues) was deduced by the nucleotide sequence analysis of complete cDNA by Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends, based on tryptic and chymotryptic peptide sequences. Partly purified TmXET6.3, expressed in Pichia occurred in N-glycosylated and unglycosylated forms. The quantification of hetero-transglycosylation activities of TmXET6.3 revealed that (1,3;1,4)-, (1,6)- and (1,4)-β-D-glucooligosaccharides were the preferred acceptor substrates, while (1,4)-β-D-xylooligosaccharides, and arabinoxylo- and glucomanno-oligosaccharides were less preferred. The 3D model of TmXET6.3, and bioinformatics analyses of identified and putative plant xyloglucan endotransglycosylases (XETs)/hydrolases (XEHs) of the GH16 family revealed that H94, A104, Q108, K234 and K237 were the key residues that underpinned the acceptor substrate specificity of TmXET6.3. Compared to the wild-type enzyme, the single Q108R and K237T, and double-K234T/K237T and triple-H94Q/A104D/Q108R variants exhibited enhanced hetero-transglycosylation activities with xyloglucan and (1,4)-β-D-glucooligosaccharides, while those with (1,3;1,4)- and (1,6)-β-D-glucooligosaccharides were suppressed; the incorporation of xyloglucan to (1,4)-β-D-glucooligosaccharides by the H94Q variant was influenced most extensively. Structural and biochemical data of non-specific TmXET6.3 presented here extend the classic XET reaction mechanism by which these enzymes operate in plant cell walls. The evaluations of TmXET6.3 transglycosylation activities and the incidence of investigated residues in other members of the GH16 family suggest that a broad acceptor substrate specificity in plant XET enzymes could be more widespread than previously anticipated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30868545
doi: 10.1007/s11103-019-00852-8
pii: 10.1007/s11103-019-00852-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Complementary
0
Plant Proteins
0
Glycosyltransferases
EC 2.4.-
xyloglucan endotransglycosylase
EC 2.4.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181-197Subventions
Organisme : VEGA
ID : 2/0058/16
Organisme : Australian Research Council
ID : DP120100900
Références
Trends Plant Sci. 1999 May;4(5):176-183
pubmed: 10322557
Plant J. 1999 May;18(4):371-82
pubmed: 10406121
Trends Plant Sci. 1999 Sep;4(9):361-6
pubmed: 10462769
Eur J Biochem. 1999 Oct 1;265(1):394-403
pubmed: 10491197
Plant Cell. 2000 Jul;12(7):1229-37
pubmed: 10899986
Biochem J. 2001 May 1;355(Pt 3):671-9
pubmed: 11311129
Plant J. 2001 Apr;26(1):23-34
pubmed: 11359607
Gen Physiol Biophys. 2000 Dec;19(4):427-40
pubmed: 11409845
Plant Physiol. 2001 Nov;127(3):1180-92
pubmed: 11706197
Plant Physiol. 1993 Dec;103(4):1399-1406
pubmed: 12232034
Planta. 2002 Oct;215(6):989-96
pubmed: 12355159
Plant Cell. 2002 Dec;14(12):3073-88
pubmed: 12468728
Plant Cell Physiol. 2002 Dec;43(12):1421-35
pubmed: 12514239
Biochimie. 2003 Mar-Apr;85(3-4):413-22
pubmed: 12770780
J Biol Chem. 1992 Oct 15;267(29):21058-64
pubmed: 1400418
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1992 Nov 1;298(2):365-70
pubmed: 1416968
Plant Cell. 2004 Apr;16(4):874-86
pubmed: 15020748
Plant J. 2004 Apr;38(1):27-37
pubmed: 15053757
Biochem J. 1992 Mar 15;282 ( Pt 3):821-8
pubmed: 1554366
Carbohydr Res. 2006 Apr 10;341(5):577-81
pubmed: 16445892
Planta. 2006 Oct;224(5):1091-102
pubmed: 16649044
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2006 Nov-Dec;44(11-12):707-13
pubmed: 17079153
Plant Biotechnol J. 2006 Mar;4(2):145-67
pubmed: 17177793
J Biol Chem. 2007 Apr 27;282(17):12951-62
pubmed: 17329246
Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Jun;48(6):843-55
pubmed: 17504814
Plant Cell. 2007 Jun;19(6):1947-63
pubmed: 17557806
Anal Biochem. 2008 Apr 15;375(2):232-6
pubmed: 18158908
Plant J. 2008 Jul;55(2):240-52
pubmed: 18397375
Proteins. 2009 Jun;75(4):820-36
pubmed: 19004021
FEBS J. 2009 Jan;276(2):437-56
pubmed: 19076217
Ann Bot. 2009 Aug;104(2):197-204
pubmed: 19454593
Biochem J. 1991 Oct 15;279 ( Pt 2):529-35
pubmed: 1953647
Plant Physiol. 2009 Dec;151(4):1741-50
pubmed: 19783642
Glycoconj J. 2010 Jan;27(1):79-87
pubmed: 19953317
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010 Apr;48(4):207-15
pubmed: 20153658
Plant Physiol. 2011 Jan;155(1):399-413
pubmed: 21057113
Nat Methods. 2011 Sep 29;8(10):785-6
pubmed: 21959131
Mol Syst Biol. 2011 Oct 11;7:539
pubmed: 21988835
Planta. 2013 Jan;237(1):173-87
pubmed: 23001197
New Phytol. 2013 Jan;197(1):111-22
pubmed: 23078260
Plant Cell. 2012 Nov;24(11):4511-24
pubmed: 23175743
J Plant Physiol. 2013 Sep 1;170(13):1194-201
pubmed: 23628624
Carbohydr Res. 1990 Apr 25;200:9-31
pubmed: 2379217
Biochem J. 2013 Nov 1;455(3):307-18
pubmed: 23919454
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):8998-9002
pubmed: 2461560
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014 Dec;22:122-131
pubmed: 25460077
Plant Cell Physiol. 2015 Feb;56(2):180-94
pubmed: 25613914
Plant J. 2015 Sep;83(5):753-69
pubmed: 26185964
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1870-4
pubmed: 27004904
Plant J. 2017 Feb;89(4):651-670
pubmed: 27859885
Biochem J. 2017 Mar 8;474(7):1055-1070
pubmed: 28108640
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 26;7:46099
pubmed: 28443615
Chembiochem. 2018 Apr 16;19(8):793-798
pubmed: 29384258
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018 May 1;74(Pt 5):463-470
pubmed: 29717717
Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
pubmed: 3447015
Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5
pubmed: 5432063
Carbohydr Res. 1993 Oct 4;248:285-301
pubmed: 8252539
J Mol Biol. 1993 Dec 5;234(3):779-815
pubmed: 8254673
Plant J. 1993 May;3(5):691-700
pubmed: 8374618
Plant J. 1993 May;3(5):701-11
pubmed: 8374619
Plant J. 1993 Jan;3(1):1-30
pubmed: 8401598
Planta. 1996;200(2):221-8
pubmed: 8904807
Plant Physiol. 1997 May;114(1):9-13
pubmed: 9159939
Planta. 1998 Feb;204(2):242-51
pubmed: 9487728
Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Apr 1;26(7):1628-35
pubmed: 9512532
Biochem J. 1997 Nov 1;327 ( Pt 3):699-708
pubmed: 9581545