Vascular training does matter in the outcomes of saphenous high ligation and stripping.
Absenteeism
Adult
Databases, Factual
Education, Medical, Graduate
Female
Humans
Ligation
/ education
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Portugal
Quality of Life
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Return to Sport
Return to Work
Saphenous Vein
/ diagnostic imaging
Specialization
Surgeons
/ education
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Varicose Veins
/ diagnostic imaging
Vascular Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Cosmetic techniques
Patient-reported outcome measures
Quality of life
Varicose veins
Vascular surgery
Journal
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
ISSN: 2213-3348
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101607771
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
29
09
2018
accepted:
19
01
2019
pubmed:
10
5
2019
medline:
14
7
2020
entrez:
10
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Varicose vein (VV) surgery is frequently performed by surgeons without formal vascular training. We aimed to compare the outcomes of the procedure based on the background of the surgeon. All patients registered with VV surgery between 2004 and 2016 in Portuguese public hospitals were included in the study. Intrahospital outcomes were assessed from this administrative database. A random multicenter sample of 315 patients submitted to saphenous high ligation and stripping (175 patients from six vascular surgery departments and 140 patients from five general surgery divisions) were further queried over the phone, whereby additional nonregistered outcomes were evaluated: preoperative venous ultrasound, impact on quality of life by the 14-item Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire, visual analogue scale evaluation (score of 1 to 5) of the aesthetic results and general satisfaction, work absence days, and time to return to physical activities. In 13 years, there were 153,382 patients submitted to VV surgery. Of these, 49% were operated on by general surgeons and 40% by vascular surgeons; in 11%, it was not possible to identify the specialty performing the operation. Twenty-three deaths were registered (no differences between groups). In the general surgery group, 14% of patients were hospitalized for more than one night compared with 3% in the vascular group (P < .001). Reintervention rate during the period analyzed was significantly higher in the general surgery group (13.5% vs 8.2%; P < .001). Rate of outpatient surgery was higher in the vascular surgery group (60% vs 36%; P < .001). Phone query revealed similar overall satisfaction and improvement in quality of life in both groups (4.2 vs 4.0 [P = .275] and 35% vs 36% [P = .745], respectively). However, patients operated on by general surgeons reported worse surgical scars (2.8 vs 2.1; P = .007), higher number of residual VVs (2.4 vs 1.7; P = .006), and higher number of days absent from work (40 vs 27 days; P = .005) and took longer to resume physical activities (60 vs 41 days; P = .001). Despite that the majority of VV surgery in Portugal is executed by general surgeons, this study highlights important advantages when it is performed by surgeons with vascular training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31068278
pii: S2213-333X(19)30164-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.01.060
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
732-738Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.