Preclinical rationale for entinostat in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma.
Adolescent
Animals
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Benzamides
/ administration & dosage
CRISPR-Cas Systems
Cell Differentiation
/ drug effects
Cell Line, Tumor
Cellular Reprogramming
/ drug effects
Child
Child, Preschool
Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor
Female
Histone Deacetylase 1
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred NOD
Mice, SCID
Pyridines
/ administration & dosage
RNA-Seq
Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar
/ drug therapy
Rhabdomyosarcoma, Embryonal
/ drug therapy
Tumor Burden
/ drug effects
Tumor Microenvironment
/ drug effects
Vincristine
/ administration & dosage
Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (eRMS)
Entinostat
HDAC3
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX)
Vincristine
Journal
Skeletal muscle
ISSN: 2044-5040
Titre abrégé: Skelet Muscle
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101561193
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 05 2019
21 05 2019
Historique:
received:
10
01
2019
accepted:
17
04
2019
entrez:
23
5
2019
pubmed:
23
5
2019
medline:
6
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in the pediatric cancer population. Survival among metastatic RMS patients has remained dismal yet unimproved for years. We previously identified the class I-specific histone deacetylase inhibitor, entinostat (ENT), as a pharmacological agent that transcriptionally suppresses the PAX3:FOXO1 tumor-initiating fusion gene found in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (aRMS), and we further investigated the mechanism by which ENT suppresses PAX3:FOXO1 oncogene and demonstrated the preclinical efficacy of ENT in RMS orthotopic allograft and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. In this study, we investigated whether ENT also has antitumor activity in fusion-negative eRMS orthotopic allografts and PDX models either as a single agent or in combination with vincristine (VCR). We tested the efficacy of ENT and VCR as single agents and in combination in orthotopic allograft and PDX mouse models of eRMS. We then performed CRISPR screening to identify which HDAC among the class I HDACs is responsible for tumor growth inhibition in eRMS. To analyze whether ENT treatment as a single agent or in combination with VCR induces myogenic differentiation, we performed hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining in tumors. ENT in combination with the chemotherapy VCR has synergistic antitumor activity in a subset of fusion-negative eRMS in orthotopic "allografts," although PDX mouse models were too hypersensitive to the VCR dose used to detect synergy. Mechanistic studies involving CRISPR suggest that HDAC3 inhibition is the primary mechanism of cell-autonomous cytoreduction in eRMS. Following cytoreduction in vivo, residual tumor cells in the allograft models treated with chemotherapy undergo a dramatic, entinostat-induced (70-100%) conversion to non-proliferative rhabdomyoblasts. Our results suggest that the targeting class I HDACs may provide a therapeutic benefit for selected patients with eRMS. ENT's preclinical in vivo efficacy makes ENT a rational drug candidate in a phase II clinical trial for eRMS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in the pediatric cancer population. Survival among metastatic RMS patients has remained dismal yet unimproved for years. We previously identified the class I-specific histone deacetylase inhibitor, entinostat (ENT), as a pharmacological agent that transcriptionally suppresses the PAX3:FOXO1 tumor-initiating fusion gene found in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (aRMS), and we further investigated the mechanism by which ENT suppresses PAX3:FOXO1 oncogene and demonstrated the preclinical efficacy of ENT in RMS orthotopic allograft and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. In this study, we investigated whether ENT also has antitumor activity in fusion-negative eRMS orthotopic allografts and PDX models either as a single agent or in combination with vincristine (VCR).
METHODS
We tested the efficacy of ENT and VCR as single agents and in combination in orthotopic allograft and PDX mouse models of eRMS. We then performed CRISPR screening to identify which HDAC among the class I HDACs is responsible for tumor growth inhibition in eRMS. To analyze whether ENT treatment as a single agent or in combination with VCR induces myogenic differentiation, we performed hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining in tumors.
RESULTS
ENT in combination with the chemotherapy VCR has synergistic antitumor activity in a subset of fusion-negative eRMS in orthotopic "allografts," although PDX mouse models were too hypersensitive to the VCR dose used to detect synergy. Mechanistic studies involving CRISPR suggest that HDAC3 inhibition is the primary mechanism of cell-autonomous cytoreduction in eRMS. Following cytoreduction in vivo, residual tumor cells in the allograft models treated with chemotherapy undergo a dramatic, entinostat-induced (70-100%) conversion to non-proliferative rhabdomyoblasts.
CONCLUSION
Our results suggest that the targeting class I HDACs may provide a therapeutic benefit for selected patients with eRMS. ENT's preclinical in vivo efficacy makes ENT a rational drug candidate in a phase II clinical trial for eRMS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31113472
doi: 10.1186/s13395-019-0198-x
pii: 10.1186/s13395-019-0198-x
pmc: PMC6528217
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
0
Benzamides
0
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
0
Pyridines
0
entinostat
1ZNY4FKK9H
Vincristine
5J49Q6B70F
HDAC1 protein, human
EC 3.5.1.98
Hdac1 protein, mouse
EC 3.5.1.98
Histone Deacetylase 1
EC 3.5.1.98
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA045508
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA143082
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA189299
Pays : United States
Références
Cancer Cell. 2013 Dec 9;24(6):710-24
pubmed: 24332040
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Jul 15;59(1):5-10
pubmed: 22378628
Cancer. 2019 Jan 15;125(2):290-297
pubmed: 30351457
Oncologist. 2005 Aug;10(7):518-27
pubmed: 16079319
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 27;113(52):15090-15095
pubmed: 27956629
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jan 1;21(1):78-84
pubmed: 12506174
Genes Dev. 2014 Jul 15;28(14):1578-91
pubmed: 25030697
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999 Dec;26(4):275-85
pubmed: 10534762
Am J Clin Pathol. 2005 Jan;123(1):75-90
pubmed: 15762282
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Jun;33(6):661-7
pubmed: 25961408
Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 Apr;10(4):697-707
pubmed: 21447712
Stem Cells. 2013 Nov;31(11):2304-12
pubmed: 23897781
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006 Sep;28(9):563-7
pubmed: 17006261
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):117-22
pubmed: 26503200
Cancer. 1995 Sep 15;76(6):1073-85
pubmed: 8625211
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Dec;64(12):
pubmed: 28521080
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
pubmed: 10802651
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1989 Sep;1(1):23-35
pubmed: 2487144
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004 Apr;26(4):243-7
pubmed: 15087952
Mini Rev Med Chem. 2018;18(7):597-608
pubmed: 28425867
Cancer Cell. 2014 Aug 11;26(2):154-5
pubmed: 25117705
Can Urol Assoc J. 2011 Feb;5(1):E7-E10
pubmed: 21470524
Sci Signal. 2018 Nov 20;11(557):
pubmed: 30459282
J Cell Sci. 1997 May;110 ( Pt 9):1083-9
pubmed: 9175704
Cancer Discov. 2014 Feb;4(2):216-31
pubmed: 24436047