Comparison of sampling techniques and different media for the enrichment and isolation of cellulolytic organisms from biogas fermenters.


Journal

Systematic and applied microbiology
ISSN: 1618-0984
Titre abrégé: Syst Appl Microbiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8306133

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 27 03 2019
revised: 15 05 2019
accepted: 17 05 2019
pubmed: 4 6 2019
medline: 30 7 2019
entrez: 3 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Biogas plants achieve its highest yield on plant biomass only with the most efficient hydrolysis of cellulose. This is driven by highly specialized hydrolytic microorganisms, which we have analyzed by investigating enrichment strategies for the isolation of cellulolytic bacteria out of a lab-scale biogas fermenter. We compared three different cultivation media as well as two different inoculation materials: Enrichment on filter paper in nylon bags (in sacco) or raw digestate. Next generation sequencing of the V3/V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA of metagenomic DNA from six different enrichment cultures, each in biological triplicates, revealed an average richness of 48 different OTU's with an average evenness of 0.3 in each sample. β-Diversity of the bacterial community revealed significant differences between the two sampling techniques or the different media used. The isolation attempt of single cellulolytic organisms resulted in several clonal pure cultures. Regardless which medium or inoculation material, well-known cellulolytic key players such as Clostridium cellulosi, Herbinix hemicellulosilytica and Hungateiclostridium thermocellum were among the isolates. The inoculation material as well as the cultivation conditions are crucial to cultivate the representative cellulolytic organisms. Taking raw digestate as inoculation material and using the same material, filtered and sterilized, for supplementing media allowed to imitate the natural habitat. Pre-enrichment of cellulolytic organisms directly in their natural habitat led to significant advantages concerning high diversity and high abundance of unknown cellulolytic organisms, which is a key factor for the isolation of hitherto unknown species.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31153679
pii: S0723-2020(19)30126-2
doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2019.05.002
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biofuels 0
Culture Media 0
DNA, Bacterial 0
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S 0
Cellulose 9004-34-6

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

481-487

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Regina Rettenmaier (R)

Department of Microbiology, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany.

Carina Duerr (C)

Department of Microbiology, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany.

Klaus Neuhaus (K)

Core Facility Microbiome/NGS, ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Berg 3, 85354 Freising, Germany.

Wolfgang Liebl (W)

Department of Microbiology, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany. Electronic address: wliebl@wzw.tum.de.

Vladimir V Zverlov (VV)

Department of Microbiology, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany; Institute of Molecular Genetics, RAS, Kurchatov Sq. 2, 123128 Moscow, Russia. Electronic address: vladimir.zverlov@tum.de.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Aspergillus Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Coculture Techniques Secondary Metabolism Streptomyces rimosus
Aerosols Humans Decontamination Air Microbiology Masks

Classifications MeSH