Gender-based discrimination is prevalent in the integrated vascular trainee experience and serves as a predictor of burnout.
Adult
Age Distribution
Attitude of Health Personnel
Burnout, Professional
/ diagnosis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education, Medical, Graduate
Female
Humans
Male
Physicians, Women
/ psychology
Prevalence
Racism
/ psychology
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Sexism
Sexual Harassment
/ psychology
Surgeons
/ education
United States
/ epidemiology
Vascular Surgical Procedures
/ education
Workplace
/ psychology
Bias
Burnout, professional
Physicians, women
Residency
Surveys and questionnaires
Workplace
vascular surgery
Journal
Journal of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-6809
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8407742
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
received:
01
01
2019
accepted:
21
02
2019
pubmed:
23
6
2019
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
23
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Trainee burnout is on the rise and negative training environments may contribute. In addition, as the proportion of women entering vascular surgery increases, identifying factors that challenge recruitment and retention is vital as we grow our workforce to meet demand. This study sought to characterize the learning environment of vascular residents and to determine how gender-based discrimination and bias (GBDB) affect the clinical experience. A survey was developed to evaluate the trainee experience; demographics and a two-item burnout index were also included. The instrument was sent electronically to all integrated (0 + 5) vascular surgery residents in the United States. Univariate analyses were performed and predictors of burnout identified. A total of 284 integrated vascular residents were invited to participate and 212 (75%) completed the survey. Participants were predominantly male (64%) and white (56%), with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range, 28-32 years). Seventy-nine percent of respondents endorsed some form of negative workplace experience and 30% met high-risk criteria for burnout. More than a third (38%) of residents endorsed personally experiencing GBDB, with a significant difference between men and women (14% vs 80%; P < .001). Women were more likely than men to report witnessing GBDB (76% vs 56%; P = .003). Patients and nurses were the most frequently cited sources of GBDB (80% and 64%, respectively), with vascular surgery attendings cited by 41% of trainees. One in four female resident respondents indicated being sexually harassed during the course of training; this was significantly higher than for male residents (25% vs 1%; P < .001). Nearly half (46%) of trainees who witnessed or experienced GBDB thought that quality of patient care, job satisfaction, personal well-being, and personal risk of burnout were directly affected as a result of GBDB. GBDB was predictive of burnout (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.5; P = .04), as were longer work hours (>80 h/wk; odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.1; P = .03). GBDB was experienced by 38% of integrated trainees, with women significantly more affected than men. GBDB is predictive of burnout, and this has significant implications for our specialty in the recruitment and retention of female physicians. Resources addressing these issues are needed to maintain a diverse workforce and to promote physician well-being.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31227409
pii: S0741-5214(19)31029-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.064
pmc: PMC7908058
mid: NIHMS1672586
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
220-227Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL098036
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):132-49
pubmed: 26695473
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar;5(1):25-30
pubmed: 24404222
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jun;222(6):1230-1239
pubmed: 27106639
Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11):1691-1698
pubmed: 31274522
Arch Surg. 2011 Feb;146(2):211-7
pubmed: 21339435
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Apr;69(4):1233-1242
pubmed: 30301691
World J Surg. 2016 Nov;40(11):2560-2566
pubmed: 27624759
Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):625-33
pubmed: 22388107
J Vasc Surg. 2018 May;67(5):1618-1625
pubmed: 29503000
Ann Surg. 2009 Sep;250(3):463-71
pubmed: 19730177
J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):248-52
pubmed: 19022605
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Dec;24(12):1318-21
pubmed: 19802645
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Oct;50(4):946-52
pubmed: 19703756
Arch Surg. 2011 Jan;146(1):54-62
pubmed: 21242446
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):155-61
pubmed: 24043567
JAMA. 2004 Dec 15;292(23):2880-9
pubmed: 15598920
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jan 14;17(1):14
pubmed: 28088241
Arch Surg. 2006 Apr;141(4):405-7; discussion 407-8
pubmed: 16618901
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Nov;27(11):1445-52
pubmed: 22362127
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):265-272
pubmed: 27973673
JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):952-60
pubmed: 21900135
Med Educ Online. 2015 Feb 03;20:25923
pubmed: 25652117
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Jun;9(3):294-301
pubmed: 28638506
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Sep;223(3):440-51
pubmed: 27238875
Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11 Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Pr):S64-S69
pubmed: 27779512