Osimertinib for Japanese patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A pooled subgroup analysis.
Acrylamides
/ administration & dosage
Administration, Oral
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aniline Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
Diarrhea
/ chemically induced
Disease Progression
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
/ drug effects
ErbB Receptors
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Exanthema
/ chemically induced
Humans
Japan
/ epidemiology
Lung Diseases, Interstitial
/ chemically induced
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Middle Aged
Paronychia
/ chemically induced
Progression-Free Survival
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Survival Analysis
Survival Rate
EGFR mutation
acquired resistance
non-small-cell lung cancer
osimertinib
tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Journal
Cancer science
ISSN: 1349-7006
Titre abrégé: Cancer Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101168776
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
25
02
2019
revised:
27
06
2019
accepted:
28
06
2019
pubmed:
3
7
2019
medline:
1
10
2019
entrez:
3
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. However, almost all patients develop resistance after approximately 1 y of treatment, with >50% of cases due to the T790M secondary mutation of the EGFR gene. A large global Phase III study (AURA3) demonstrated that osimertinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) over platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC who had progressed on previous EGFR-TKI therapy. However, it is not clear whether efficacy or safety of osimertinib in Japanese patients is similar to the overall population. We report a pre-planned subgroup analysis of pooled Phase II data from the AURA Extension and AURA2 trials to investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in Japanese patients. This study included 81 Japanese patients. Patients were administered 80 mg osimertinib orally once daily until disease progression. The main endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and safety. The ORR was 63.6% and median PFS was 13.8 mo. Overall survival rate at 36 mo was 54.0%. The most common all-cause adverse events (AEs) were rash (grouped term; 65.4%), diarrhea (51.9%), paronychia (grouped term; 49.4%), and dry skin (grouped term; 39.5%). Most AEs were grade 1-2. Five patients (6.2%) developed interstitial lung disease, resulting in two deaths (2.5%). Osimertinib demonstrated favorable ORR and PFS in Japanese patients, similar to the overall population. Additionally, osimertinib has good efficacy and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with NSCLC who had acquired resistance due to the T790M mutation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31265163
doi: 10.1111/cas.14120
pmc: PMC6726692
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acrylamides
0
Aniline Compounds
0
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
osimertinib
3C06JJ0Z2O
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2884-2893Subventions
Organisme : AstraZeneca
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
Références
Oncotarget. 2015 Sep 29;6(29):26814-25
pubmed: 26308162
Cancer. 2019 Mar 15;125(6):892-901
pubmed: 30512189
Br J Cancer. 2004 Aug;91 Suppl 2:S3-10
pubmed: 15340372
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Feb;5(2):179-84
pubmed: 20101144
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1643-1652
pubmed: 27751847
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Feb;11(2):121-8
pubmed: 20022809
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):213-22
pubmed: 24439929
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015 Apr;4(2):110-8
pubmed: 25870793
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):239-46
pubmed: 22285168
J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Jan;8(1):96-101
pubmed: 23207920
Cancer Discov. 2014 Sep;4(9):1046-61
pubmed: 24893891
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 20;35(12):1288-1296
pubmed: 28221867
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 1;21(17):3913-23
pubmed: 25948633
Cancer Sci. 2014 Dec;105(12):1584-90
pubmed: 25287435
Ann Oncol. 2013 Jan;24(1):54-9
pubmed: 22967997
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Apr 15;19(8):2240-7
pubmed: 23470965
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2380-8
pubmed: 20573926
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1689-99
pubmed: 25923549
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Mar;10(3):486-91
pubmed: 25695221
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90
pubmed: 21296855
Lung Cancer. 2015 Feb;87(2):136-40
pubmed: 25553650
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3327-34
pubmed: 23816960
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):735-42
pubmed: 21783417
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Nov;14(11):775-87
pubmed: 15654720
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 10;364(10):947-55
pubmed: 21388312
Br J Cancer. 2004 Aug;91 Suppl 2:S18-23
pubmed: 15340374
Cancer Sci. 2019 Sep;110(9):2884-2893
pubmed: 31265163
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640
pubmed: 27959700
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jan;48(1):88-97
pubmed: 25761482
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun;43(6):664-8
pubmed: 23585689
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 May;83(5):584-94
pubmed: 18452692
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 1;24(22):3657-63
pubmed: 16877734
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 20;29(21):2866-74
pubmed: 21670455