Barcode sequencing identifies resistant mechanisms to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in circulating tumor DNA of lung cancer patients.
Aged
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ genetics
Circulating Tumor DNA
/ genetics
DNA Copy Number Variations
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
ErbB Receptors
/ genetics
Female
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
/ methods
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ genetics
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met
/ genetics
Sequence Analysis, DNA
circulating tumor DNA
droplet digital PCR
epidermal growth factor receptor
molecular barcode sequencing
non-small cell lung cancer
Journal
Cancer science
ISSN: 1349-7006
Titre abrégé: Cancer Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101168776
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
25
12
2018
revised:
22
07
2019
accepted:
25
07
2019
pubmed:
31
7
2019
medline:
12
10
2019
entrez:
31
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Most patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will inevitably develop acquired resistance induced by treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). The mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-TKI are multifactorial, and the detection of these mechanisms is critical for treatment choices in patients who have progressed after EGFR-TKI therapy. We evaluated the feasibility of a molecular barcode method using next-generation sequencing to detect multifactorial resistance mechanisms in circulating tumor DNA and compared the results with those obtained using other technologies. Plasma samples were collected from 25 EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients after the development of EGFR-TKI resistance. Somatic mutation profiles of these samples were assessed using two methods of next-generation sequencing and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). The positive rate for EGFR-sensitizing mutations was 18/25 (72.0%) using ddPCR, 17/25 (68.0%) using amplicon sequencing, and 19/25 (76.0%) using molecular barcode sequencing. Rate of the EGFR T790M resistance mutation among patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations was shown to be 7/18 (38.9%) using ddPCR, 6/17 (35.3%) using amplicon sequencing, and 8/19 (42.1%) using molecular barcode sequencing. Copy number gain in the MET gene was detected in three cases using ddPCR. PIK3CA, KRAS and TP53 mutations were detected using amplicon sequencing. Molecular barcode sequencing detected PIK3CA, TP53, KRAS, and MAP2K1 mutations. Results of the three assays were comparable; however, in cell-free DNA, molecular barcode sequencing detected mutations causing multifactorial resistance more sensitively than did the other assays.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31361375
doi: 10.1111/cas.14153
pmc: PMC6778626
doi:
Substances chimiques
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
MET protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3350-3357Subventions
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : 14525177
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
Références
Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Sep;15(9):5113-22
pubmed: 7651428
Cancer Sci. 2016 Nov;107(11):1660-1666
pubmed: 27575703
Oncologist. 2016 Apr;21(4):481-6
pubmed: 27022036
Neoplasia. 2011 Nov;13(11):1019-25
pubmed: 22131877
Cancer Sci. 2019 Oct;110(10):3350-3357
pubmed: 31361375
Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Oct 25;17(11):637-658
pubmed: 29068003
Springerplus. 2015 Jan 05;4:7
pubmed: 25674493
Cancer Res. 2008 Jul 15;68(14):5524-8
pubmed: 18632602
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 26;104(52):20932-7
pubmed: 18093943
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Mar 23;3(75):75ra26
pubmed: 21430269
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jun 15;19(12):3276-84
pubmed: 23637122
Oncotarget. 2015 Oct 13;6(31):30850-8
pubmed: 26334838
Nat Methods. 2011 Nov 20;9(1):72-4
pubmed: 22101854
Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 6;7(36):58492-58499
pubmed: 27542267
Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):177-82
pubmed: 3798106
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3335-41
pubmed: 23816963
PLoS One. 2015 May 08;10(5):e0121891
pubmed: 25954997
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2380-8
pubmed: 20573926
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1689-99
pubmed: 25923549
Oncotarget. 2016 Jan 19;7(3):3453-60
pubmed: 26657506
Cancer Sci. 2016 Nov;107(11):1667-1676
pubmed: 27581340
Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 15;77(8):2078-2089
pubmed: 28202511
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1039-43
pubmed: 17463250
Cancer Discov. 2012 Oct;2(10):922-33
pubmed: 22956644
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2129-39
pubmed: 15118073
Cancer Sci. 2016 Dec;107(12):1843-1850
pubmed: 27712015
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;28(1):136-141
pubmed: 28177428
Genome Res. 2013 May;23(5):843-54
pubmed: 23382536