Optimizing clinical exome design and parallel gene-testing for recessive genetic conditions in preconception carrier screening: Translational research genomic data from 14,125 exomes.
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Directed Tissue Donation
Exome
/ genetics
Female
Genes, Recessive
Genetic Carrier Screening
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genetic Testing
Genome, Human
/ genetics
Genomics
Heterozygote
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Infertility
/ epidemiology
Male
Mutation
/ genetics
Translational Research, Biomedical
Exome Sequencing
Journal
PLoS genetics
ISSN: 1553-7404
Titre abrégé: PLoS Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101239074
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
23
05
2019
accepted:
10
09
2019
revised:
17
10
2019
pubmed:
8
10
2019
medline:
1
2
2020
entrez:
8
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Limited translational genomic research data have been reported on the application of exome sequencing and parallel gene testing for preconception carrier screening (PCS). Here, we present individual-level data from a large PCS program in which exome sequencing was routinely performed on either gamete donors (5,845) or infertile patients (8,280) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment without any known family history of inheritable genetic conditions. Individual-level data on pathogenic variants were used to define conditions for PCS based on criteria for severity, penetrance, inheritance pattern, and age of onset. Fetal risk was defined based on actual carrier frequency data accounting for the specific inheritance pattern (fetal disease risk, FDR). In addition, large-scale application of exome sequencing for PCS allowed a deep investigation of the incidence of medically actionable secondary findings in this population. Exome sequencing achieved remarkable clinical sensitivity for reproductive risk of highly penetrant childhood-onset disorders (1/337 conceptions) through analysis of 114 selected gene-condition pairs. A significant contribution to fetal disease risk was observed for rare (carrier rate < 1:100) and X-linked conditions (16.7% and 41.2% of total FDR, respectively). Subgroup analysis of 776 IVF couples identified 37 at increased reproductive risk (4.8%; 95% CI = 3.4-6.5). Further, two additional couples had increased risk for very rare conditions when both members of a parental pair were treated as a unit and the search was extended to the entire exome. About 2.3% of participants showed at least one pathogenic variant for genes included in the updated American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics v2.0 list of secondary findings. Gamete donors and IVF couples showed similar carrier burden for both carrier screening and secondary findings, indicating no causal relationship to fertility. These translational research data will facilitate development of more effective PCS strategies that maximize clinical sensitivity with minimal counterproductive effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31589614
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008409
pii: PGENETICS-D-19-00846
pmc: PMC6797235
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1008409Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: all authors are full time employees of igenomix.
Références
Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1286-93
pubmed: 26354092
Genet Med. 2018 Apr;20(5):513-523
pubmed: 29261177
Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Jun 7;102(6):1078-1089
pubmed: 29754767
Genet Med. 2019 Sep;21(9):1948-1957
pubmed: 30760891
Clin Chem. 2018 Jul;64(7):1063-1073
pubmed: 29760218
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Genet Med. 2018 Dec;20(12):1635-1643
pubmed: 29790872
Genet Med. 2018 Nov;20(11):1365-1373
pubmed: 29790874
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;125(3):653-62
pubmed: 25730230
Genet Med. 2015 Dec;17(12):1007-11
pubmed: 25856671
J Community Genet. 2018 Jan;9(1):1-18
pubmed: 28664264
Nature. 2010 Oct 28;467(7319):1061-73
pubmed: 20981092
Hum Mutat. 2015 Aug;36(8):815-22
pubmed: 25973577
J Mol Diagn. 2015 Jul;17(4):456-61
pubmed: 25960255
Hum Reprod. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):1951-1956
pubmed: 28938745
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2235-42
pubmed: 26014595
Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):583-592
pubmed: 28492530
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D862-8
pubmed: 26582918
Clin Chem. 2016 Apr;62(4):647-54
pubmed: 26847218
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 May;27(5):669-670
pubmed: 30760884
JAMA. 2016 Aug 16;316(7):734-42
pubmed: 27533158
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Nov;25(11):1291
pubmed: 29023436
Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):809-818
pubmed: 28079900
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e114391
pubmed: 25494330
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Aug 16;17(9):507-22
pubmed: 27528417
Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Aug 30;129A(2):136-43
pubmed: 15316978
Science. 2016 Dec 23;354(6319):
pubmed: 28008009
Genet Med. 2019 Sep;21(9):1931-1939
pubmed: 30816298
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Nov 9;8(364):364ra151
pubmed: 27831900
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 21;374(3):223-32
pubmed: 26789871
J Community Genet. 2014 Apr;5(2):191-8
pubmed: 24062228
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2987-93
pubmed: 21903627
Hum Genet. 2018 Jan;137(1):31-37
pubmed: 29128982
Fly (Austin). 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):80-92
pubmed: 22728672
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):114-123
pubmed: 29895855
Eur J Med Genet. 2014 Nov-Dec;57(11-12):613-6
pubmed: 25281896
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1067-1076
pubmed: 27181684
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):531-8
pubmed: 27065010
Genet Med. 2012 Aug;14(8):729-36
pubmed: 22498846
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 Jun;62(6):103529
pubmed: 30165243
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 04;379(14):1353-1362
pubmed: 30281996
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):e35-e40
pubmed: 28225425
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):207-212
pubmed: 29961769
Genome Med. 2015 Jun 13;7(1):54
pubmed: 26195989
Genome Res. 2015 Mar;25(3):305-15
pubmed: 25637381
Bioinformatics. 2019 Jun 1;35(11):1978-1980
pubmed: 30376034
Hum Reprod. 2014 Aug;29(8):1610-7
pubmed: 24927929
Genet Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):249-255
pubmed: 27854360