Does breeding system affect pollen morphology? A case study in Zygophylloideae (Zygophyllaceae).

Cleistogamy Correlation analysis Pollen morphology Selfing Zygophylloideae

Journal

Plant reproduction
ISSN: 2194-7961
Titre abrégé: Plant Reprod
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101602701

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2019
Historique:
received: 18 01 2019
accepted: 14 10 2019
pubmed: 23 10 2019
medline: 29 2 2020
entrez: 23 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We found a correlation between large pollens and selfing and between psilate pollen walls and cleistogamy. Flowering plants display extraordinary diversity in pollen morphology, yet the functional significance of this variation is not well understood. Zygophylloideae is a lineage characterized by high diversity of breeding systems, ranging from obligate selfing to facultative selfing and further to facultative outcrossing. This group is particularly suitable for testing hypotheses about the influence of breeding system on pollen morphology. We studied pollen morphology in 20 species of Zygophylloideae and one species of Tribuloideae as an outgroup. A phylogeny of Zygophylloideae was created based on available DNA sequences and used to trace the evolution of pollen characters. We performed a phylogenetic analysis of correlated evolution between breeding system and several pollen characters. Three types of pollen morphology were found in the studied species. Tricolporate pollen with a small apocolpium, microreticulate ornamentation and medium size was determined as the ancestral state in Zygophylloideae. The correlation analysis indicated an association between large pollens and selfing and between psilate pollen wall and cleistogamy. We hypothesize that large size of pollen in selfing species is mainly associated with the low number of produced pollen indicating a trade-off between pollen size and number. The independence from pollen vector in cleistogamous flowers accounts for the evolution of smooth pollen walls in these species.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31637522
doi: 10.1007/s00497-019-00379-4
pii: 10.1007/s00497-019-00379-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

381-390

Références

Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):540-52
pubmed: 10742046
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Apr;97:129-144
pubmed: 26790586
Evolution. 1969 Mar;23(1):28-35
pubmed: 28562955
Am J Bot. 2016 Mar;103(3):423-36
pubmed: 26944352
Syst Biol. 2001 Nov-Dec;50(6):913-25
pubmed: 12116640
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 03;10(6):e0126618
pubmed: 26039362
BMC Res Notes. 2009 Jul 22;2:145
pubmed: 19624836
Am J Bot. 2016 Mar;103(3):460-70
pubmed: 26905086
Evolution. 1990 Jul;44(4):843-856
pubmed: 28569039
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7635-9
pubmed: 20404200
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1870-4
pubmed: 27004904

Auteurs

Somayeh Naghiloo (S)

Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iomE), Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany. snaghilo@uni-mainz.de.

Sedigheh Nikzat Siahkolaee (S)

Faculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Animals Hemiptera Insect Proteins Phylogeny Insecticides
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family

Classifications MeSH