Variation among S-locus haplotypes and among stylar RNases in almond.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 01 2020
Historique:
received: 22 04 2019
accepted: 31 12 2019
entrez: 19 1 2020
pubmed: 19 1 2020
medline: 20 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In many plant species, self-incompatibility systems limit self-pollination and mating among relatives. This helps maintain genetic diversity in natural populations but imposes constraints in agriculture and plant breeding. In almond [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb], the specificity of self-incompatibility is mainly determined by stylar ribonuclease (S-RNase) and S-haplotype-specific F-box (SFB) proteins, both encoded within a complex locus, S. Prior to this research, a nearly complete sequence was available for one S-locus haplotype. Here, we report complete sequences for four haplotypes and partial sequences for 11 haplotypes. Haplotypes vary in sequences of genes (particularly S-RNase and SFB), distances between genes and numbers and positions of long terminal repeat transposons. Haplotype variation outside of the S-RNase and SFB genes may help maintain functionally important associations between S-RNase and SFB alleles. Fluorescence-based assays were developed to distinguish among some S-RNase alleles. With three-dimensional modelling of five S-RNase proteins, conserved active sites were identified and variation was observed in electrostatic potential and in the numbers, characteristics and positions of secondary structural elements, loop anchoring points and glycosylation sites. A hypervariable region on the protein surface and differences in the number, location and types of glycosylation sites may contribute to determining S-RNase specificity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31953457
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57498-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-57498-6
pmc: PMC6969032
doi:

Substances chimiques

F-Box Proteins 0
Plant Proteins 0
Ribonucleases EC 3.1.-

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

583

Subventions

Organisme : Horticulture Australia (Horticulture Australia Limited)
ID : AL12015
Pays : International
Organisme : Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC)
ID : DP120100900
Pays : International

Références

Ballester, J. et al. Location of the self-incompatibility gene on the almond linkage map. Plant Breed 117, 69–72 (1998).
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01450.x
Bošković, R., Tobutt, K., Ortega, E., Sutherland, B. & Godini, A. Self-(in)compatibility of the almonds P. dulcis and P. webbii: detection and cloning of ‘wildtype S
doi: 10.1007/s00438-007-0283-4
Channuntapipat, C., Sedgley, M. & Collins, G. Sequences of the cDNAs and genomic DNAs encoding the S1, S7, S8, and Sf alleles from almond, Prunus dulcis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103, 1115–1122 (2001).
doi: 10.1007/s001220100629
Halász, J., Fodor, Á., Pedryc, A. & Hegedüs, A. S-genotyping of Eastern European almond cultivars: identification and characterization of new (S36 – S39) selfincompatibility ribonuclease alleles. Plant Breed 129, 227–232 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01686.x
Hafizi, A., Shiran, B., Maleki, B., Imani, A. & Banović, B. Identification of new S-RNase self-incompatibility alleles and characterization of natural mutations in Iranian almond cultivars. Trees 27, 497–510 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00468-012-0803-7
Ushijima, K. et al. Structural and transcriptional analysis of the self-incompatibility locus of almond: identification of a pollen-expressed F-box gene with haplotype-specific polymorphism. Plant Cell 15, 771–781 (2003).
doi: 10.1105/tpc.009290 pubmed: 12615948 pmcid: 150029
Ushijima, K. et al. Cloning and characterization of cDNAs encoding S-RNases from almond (Prunus dulcis): primary structural features and sequence diversity of the S-RNases in Rosaceae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 260, 261–268 (1998).
doi: 10.1007/s004380050894 pubmed: 9862480
Bošković, R., Tobutt, K. R., Batlle, I. & Duval, H. Correlation of ribonuclease zymograms and incompatibility genotypes in almond. Euphytica 97, 167–176 (1997).
doi: 10.1023/A:1003030913308
Matsumoto, D. & Tao, R. Recognition of a wide-range of S-RNases by S locus F-box like 2, a general-inhibitor candidate in the Prunus-specific S-RNasebased self-incompatibility system. Plant Mol. Biol. 91, 459–469 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s11103-016-0479-2 pubmed: 27071402
Matsumoto, D. & Tao, R. Recognition of S-RNAses by an S locus F-box like protein and an S haplotype-specific F-box protein in the Prunus-specific selfincompatibility system. Plant Mol. Biol. 100, 367–378 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s11103-019-00860-8 pubmed: 30937702
Grasselly, C. & Olivier, G. Mise en évidence de quelques types autocompatibles parmi les cultivars d’amandier (P. amygdalus Batsch) de la population des Pouilles. Ann. Amélio. Plantes 26, 107–113 (1976).
Socias i Company, R. Breeding self-compatible almonds in Plant Breeding Reviews Vol. 8 (ed. Janick, J.) 313–338 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1990).
Kodad, O., Socias i Company, R., Sánchez, A. & Oliveira, M. M. The expression of self-compatibility in almond may not only be due to the presence of the S
doi: 10.21273/JASHS.134.2.221
Fernández i Martí, À. et al. The almond S
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.05.024
Fernández i Martí, A., Gradziel, T. & Socias i Company, R. Methylation of the S
doi: 10.1007/s11103-014-0258-x pubmed: 25326263
Kodad, O., Socias i Company, R. & Alonso, J. M. Unilateral recognition of the S
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.01.016
Ramanauskas, K. & Igić, B. The evolutionary history of plant T2/S-type ribonucleases. PeerJ 5, e3790, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3790 (2017).
doi: 10.7717/peerj.3790 pubmed: 5598434 pmcid: 5598434
Fox, N. K., Brenner, S. E. & Chandonia, J. M. SCOPe: Structural Classification of Proteins–extended, integrating SCOP and ASTRAL data and classification of new structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D304–309 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1240 pubmed: 24304899
Matsuura, T. et al. Crystal structure at 1.5-Å resolution of Pyrus pyrifolia pistil ribonuclease responsible for gametophytic self-incompatibility. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 45261–45269 (2001).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107617200 pubmed: 11577107
Ushijima, K. et al. The S haplotype-specific F-box protein gene, SFB, is defective in self-compatible haplotypes of Prunus avium and P. mume. Plant J 39, 573–586 (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02154.x pubmed: 15272875
Jaskolski, M., Alexandratos, J. N., Bujacz, G. & Wlodawer, A. Piecing together the structure of retroviral integrase, an important target in AIDS therapy. FEBS J 276, 2926–2946 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07009.x pubmed: 19490099 pmcid: 2747025
Nesmelova, I. V. & Hackett, P. B. DDE transposases: Structural similarity and diversity. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62, 1187–1195 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.06.006 pubmed: 20615441 pmcid: 2991504
Halász, J., Kodad, O. & Hegedűs, A. Identification of a recently active Prunus-specific non-autonomous Mutator element with considerable genome shaping force. Plant J. 79, 220–231 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.12551 pubmed: 24813246
Tao, R. et al. Self-compatible peach (Prunus persica) has mutant versions of the S haplotypes found in self-incompatible Prunus species. Plant Mol. Biol. 63, 109–123 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s11103-006-9076-0 pubmed: 17006593
Channuntapipat, C. et al. Identification of incompatibility genotypes in almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) using specific primers based on the introns of the Salleles. Plant Breed. 122, 164–168 (2003).
doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00842.x
Ortega, E., Bošković, R., Sargent, D. & Tobutt, K. Analysis of S-RNase alleles of almond (Prunus dulcis): characterization of new sequences, resolution of synonyms and evidence of intragenic recombination. Mol. Genet. Genomics 276, 413–426 (2006).
doi: 10.1007/s00438-006-0146-4 pubmed: 16924547
Ortega, E., Sutherland, B. G., Dicenta, F., Boskovic, R. & Tobutt, K. R. Determination of incompatibility genotypes in almond using first and second intron consensus primers: detection of new S alleles and correction of reported S genotypes. Plant Breed. 124, 188–196 (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2004.01058.x
Sánchez-Pérez, R., Dicenta, F. & Martínez-Gómez, P. Identification of S-alleles in almond using multiplex PCR. Euphytica 138, 263–269 (2004).
doi: 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000047097.96271.bf
Gómez, E. M., Prudencio, A. S., Dicenta, F. & Ortega, E. Characterization of S
doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1231.18
Hanada, T. et al. Cloning and characterization of a self-compatible S haplotype in almond [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb. syn. P. amygdalus Batsch] to resolve previous confusion in its S -RNase sequence. HortScience 44, 609–613 (2009).
doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.3.609
Mercier, R., Mezard, C., Jenczewski, E., Macaisne, N. & Grelon, M. The molecular biology of meiosis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 66, 297–327 (2015).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035923 pubmed: 25494464
Lambing, C., Franklin, F. C. H. & Wang, C.-J. R. Understanding and manipulating meiotic recombination in plants. Plant Physiol. 173, 1530–1542 (2017).
doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01530 pubmed: 28108697 pmcid: 5338670
Ishimizu, T., Shinkawa, T., Sakiyama, F. & Norioka, S. Primary structural features of rosaceous S-RNases associated with gametophytic self-incompatibility. Plant Mol. Biol 37, 931–941 (1998).
doi: 10.1023/A:1006078500664 pubmed: 9700066
Gu, C. et al. Characterization of the S-RNase genomic DNA allele sequence in Prunus speciosa and P. pseudocerasus. Sci. Hort. 144, 93–101 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.06.041
Newbigin, E., Paape, T. & Kohn, J. R. RNase-based self-incompatibility: puzzled by pollen S. Plant Cell 20, 2286–2292 (2008).
doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.060327 pubmed: 18776062 pmcid: 2570731
Fernández i Marti, Á., Wirthensohn, M., Alonso, J., Socias i Company, R. & Hrmova, M. Molecular modelling of S-RNases involved in almond selfincompatibility. Front. Plant Sci. 3 (2012).
Ashkani, J. & Rees, D. J. G. A comprehensive study of molecular evolution at the self-incompatibility locus of Rosaceae. J. Mol. Evol. 82, 128–145 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00239-015-9726-4 pubmed: 26714486
Vieira, J., Ferreira, P., Aguiar, B., Fonseca, N. & Vieira, C. Evolutionary patterns at the RNase based gametophytic self-incompatibility system in two divergent Rosaceae groups (Maloideae and Prunus). BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 200, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-200 (2010).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-200 pubmed: 20584298 pmcid: 20584298
Ishimizu, T., Norioka, S., Kanai, M., Clarke, A. E. & Sakiyama, F. Location of cysteine and cystine residues in S-ribonucleases associated with gametophytic self-incompatibility. Eur J Biochem 242, 627–635 (1996).
doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0627r.x pubmed: 9022690
Arolas, J. L., Aviles, F. X., Chang, J. Y. & Ventura, S. Folding of small disulfide-rich proteins: clarifying the puzzle. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 292–301 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.03.005 pubmed: 16600598
Kurihara, H. et al. The crystal structure of ribonuclease Rh from Rhizopus niveus at 2.0 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 255, 310–320 (1996).
doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0025 pubmed: 8551522
Nakagawa, A. et al. Crystal structure of a ribonuclease from the seeds of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) at 1.75 Å resolution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1433, 253–260 (1999).
doi: 10.1016/S0167-4838(99)00126-0 pubmed: 10446375
Royo, J. et al. Loss of a histidine residue at the active site of S-locus ribonuclease is associated with self-compatibility in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6511–6514 (1994).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6511 pubmed: 8022814
Ishimizu, T. et al. Identification of histidine 31 and cysteine 95 in the active site of self-incompatibility associated S6 -RNase in Nicotiana alata. J. Biochem. 118, 1007–1013 (1995).
doi: 10.1093/jb/118.5.1007 pubmed: 8749320
Tanaka, N. et al. Crystal structure of a plant ribonuclease, RNase LE. J. Mol. Biol. 298, 859–873 (2000).
doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3707 pubmed: 10801354
Irie, M., Harada, M. & Sawada, F. Studies on the state of tryptophan residues in ribonuclease from Aspergillus saitoi. J. Biochem 72, 1351–1359 (1972).
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a130028 pubmed: 4664737
Lima, W. F. et al. Human RNase H1 uses one tryptophan and two lysines to position the enzyme at the 3′-DNA/5′-RNA terminus of the heteroduplex substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 49860–49867 (2003).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306543200 pubmed: 14506260
Strasser, R. Plant protein glycosylation. Glycobiology 26, 926–939 (2006).
doi: 10.1093/glycob/cww023
Matton, D. P. et al. Production of an S RNase with dual specificity suggests a novel hypothesis for the generation of new S alleles. Plant Cell 11, 2087–2097 (1999).
doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.11.2087 pubmed: 10559436 pmcid: 144125
Matton, D. P. et al. Hypervariable domains of self-incompatibility RNases mediate allele-specific pollen recognition. Plant Cell 9, 1757–1766 (1997).
doi: 10.2307/3870522 pubmed: 12237346 pmcid: 157019
Verde, I. et al. The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat Genet 45, 487–494 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/ng.2586 pubmed: 23525075
Kearse, M. et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649 (2012).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 pubmed: 22543367 pmcid: 22543367
Koressaar, T. & Remm, M. Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3. Bioinformatics 23, 1289–1291 (2007).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm091 pubmed: 17379693 pmcid: 17379693
Untergasser, A. et al. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e115 (2012).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596 pubmed: 22730293 pmcid: 22730293
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 pubmed: 24695404 pmcid: 24695404
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 pubmed: 2705234 pmcid: 2705234
Milne, I. et al. Tablet—next generation sequence assembly visualization. Bioinformatics 26, 401–402 (2010).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp666 pubmed: 19965881
Chevreux, B. et al. Using the miraEST assembler for reliable and automated mRNA transcript assembly and SNP detection in sequenced ESTs. Genome Res. 14, 1147–1159 (2004).
doi: 10.1101/gr.1917404 pubmed: 15140833 pmcid: 419793
Galardini, M., Biondi, E. G., Bazzicalupo, M. & Mengoni, A. CONTIGuator: a bacterial genomes finishing tool for structural insights on draft genomes. Source Code Biol. Med 6, 11, https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-6-11 (2011).
doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-6-11 pubmed: 3133546 pmcid: 3133546
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 pubmed: 2723002 pmcid: 2723002
Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotech 29, 24–26 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673–4680 (1994).
doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 pubmed: 7984417 pmcid: 308517
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330 pubmed: 3137218 pmcid: 3137218
Castresana, J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol 17, 540–552 (2000).
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334 pubmed: 10742046
Altschul, S., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. & Lipman, D. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).
doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 pubmed: 2231712 pmcid: 2231712
Burge, C. & Karlin, S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 78–94 (1997).
doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0951 pubmed: 9149143
Xu, Z. & Wang, H. LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W265–W268 (2007).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm286 pubmed: 17485477 pmcid: 17485477
Alioto, T. et al. Transposons played a major role in the diversification between the closely related almond and peach genomes; results from the almond genome sequence. Plant J., https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14538 (2019).
Rozas, J. et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol 34, 3299–3302 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx248 pubmed: 29029172
He, C., Holmes, J. & Anthony, J. SNP genotyping: the KASP assay. Methods. Mol. Biol 1145, 75–86 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0446-4_7 pubmed: 24816661
Friedrich, K., Konietschke, F. & Pauly, M. MANOVA.RM: Analysis of multivariate data and repeated measures designs. R Package Version 0.3.2 (2019).
Berman, H. M. et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 235–242 (2000).
doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 pubmed: 10592235 pmcid: 102472
Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389–3402 (1997).
doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 pubmed: 146917 pmcid: 146917
Jones, D. T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292, 195–202 (1999).
doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3091 pubmed: 10493868
Källberg, M. et al. Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1511–1522 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.085 pubmed: 22814390 pmcid: 4730388
Sali, A. & Blundell, T. L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779–815 (1993).
doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 pubmed: 8254673
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340 pubmed: 15034147 pmcid: 15034147
Shen, M.-Y. & Sali, A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci. 15, 2507–2524 (2006).
doi: 10.1110/ps.062416606 pubmed: 17075131 pmcid: 2242414
Eswar, N., Eramian, D., Webb, B., Shen, M.-Y. & Sali, A. Protein structure modelling with MODELLER in Structural proteomics: high-throughput methods (eds Kobe B., Guss, M. & Huber, T.) 145–159 (Humana Press, 2008).
Schymkowitz, J. W. H. et al. Prediction of water and metal binding sites and their affinities by using the Fold-X force field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10147–10152 (2005).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501980102 pubmed: 16006526
Sippl, M. J. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf 17, 355–362 (1993).
doi: 10.1002/prot.340170404
Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. App. Crystall 26, 283–291 (1993).
doi: 10.1107/S0021889892009944
Norioka, N. et al. Sequence comparison of the 5’ flanking regions of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) S-RNases associated with gametophytic selfincompatibility. Sex. Plant Reprod. 13, 289–291 (2001).
doi: 10.1007/s004970100067
Dolinsky, T. J., Nielsen, J. E., McCammon, J. A. & Baker, N. A. PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W665–667 (2004).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh381 pubmed: 15215472 pmcid: 441519
Weiner, P. K. & Kollman, P. A. AMBER: Assisted model building with energy refinement. A general program for modeling molecules and their interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 2, 287–303 (1981).
doi: 10.1002/jcc.540020311
Pei, J., Kim, B.-H. & Grishin, N. V. PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 36, 2295–2300 (2008).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn072 pubmed: 18287115 pmcid: 2367709

Auteurs

Shashi N Goonetilleke (SN)

School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.

Adam E Croxford (AE)

School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.

Timothy J March (TJ)

School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.

Michelle G Wirthensohn (MG)

School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.

Maria Hrmova (M)

School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.
School of Life Sciences, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai'an, 223300, China.

Diane E Mather (DE)

School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia. diane.mather@adelaide.edu.au.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins

Classifications MeSH