Phylogenomic Evidence for the Monophyly of Bryophytes and the Reductive Evolution of Stomata.
air pores
bryophytes
phylogenomics
plant evolution
stomata
Journal
Current biology : CB
ISSN: 1879-0445
Titre abrégé: Curr Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 06 2020
08 06 2020
Historique:
received:
13
11
2019
revised:
13
02
2020
accepted:
18
03
2020
pubmed:
18
4
2020
medline:
11
8
2021
entrez:
18
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The origin of land plants was accompanied by new adaptations to life on land, including the evolution of stomata-pores on the surface of plants that regulate gas exchange. The genes that underpin the development and function of stomata have been extensively studied in model angiosperms, such as Arabidopsis. However, little is known about stomata in bryophytes, and their evolutionary origins and ancestral function remain poorly understood. Here, we resolve the position of bryophytes in the land plant tree and investigate the evolutionary origins of genes that specify stomatal development and function. Our analyses recover bryophyte monophyly and demonstrate that the guard cell toolkit is more ancient than has been appreciated previously. We show that a range of core guard cell genes, including SPCH/MUTE, SMF, and FAMA, map back to the common ancestor of embryophytes or even earlier. These analyses suggest that the first embryophytes possessed stomata that were more sophisticated than previously envisioned and that the stomata of bryophytes have undergone reductive evolution, including their complete loss from liverworts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32302587
pii: S0960-9822(20)30418-8
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.048
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2001-2012.e2Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Interests The authors declare no competing interests.