CRISPR-Cas9-mediated induction of heritable chromosomal translocations in Arabidopsis.
Journal
Nature plants
ISSN: 2055-0278
Titre abrégé: Nat Plants
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101651677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
04
02
2020
accepted:
14
04
2020
pubmed:
27
5
2020
medline:
4
3
2021
entrez:
27
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) technology has been applied in plant breeding mainly on genes for improving single or multiple traits
Identifiants
pubmed: 32451449
doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0663-x
pii: 10.1038/s41477-020-0663-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Plant Proteins
0
Endonucleases
EC 3.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
638-645Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Zhang, Y., Massel, K., Godwin, I. D. & Gao, C. Applications and potential of genome editing in crop improvement. Genome Biol. 19, 210 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1586-y
Zhang, Y., Malzahn, A. A., Sretenovic, S. & Qi, Y. The emerging and uncultivated potential of CRISPR technology in plant science. Nat. Plants 5, 778–794 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0461-5
Schindele, A., Dorn, A. & Puchta, H. CRISPR/Cas brings plant biology and breeding into the fast lane. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 61, 7–14 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.08.006
Hua, K. et al. Perspectives on the application of genome-editing technologies in crop breeding. Mol. Plant 12, 1047–1059 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.06.009
Steinert, J., Schiml, S., Fauser, F. & Puchta, H. Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J. 84, 1295–1305 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.13078
Schmidt, C., Schindele, P. & Puchta, H. From gene editing to genome engineering: restructuring plant chromosomes via CRISPR/Cas. aBIOTECH 36, 17 (2019).
Wolter, F., Schindele, P. & Puchta, H. Plant breeding at the speed of light: the power of CRISPR/Cas to generate directed genetic diversity at multiple sites. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 176 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1775-1
Puchta, H. The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 1–14 (2005).
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri123
Filler Hayut, S., Melamed Bessudo, C. & Levy, A. A. Targeted recombination between homologous chromosomes for precise breeding in tomato. Nat. Commun. 8, 15605 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15605
Salomon, S. & Puchta, H. Capture of genomic and T-DNA sequences during double-strand break repair in somatic plant cells. EMBO J. 17, 6086–6095 (1998).
doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.20.6086
Schimmel, J., Kool, H., van Schendel, R. & Tijsterman, M. Mutational signatures of non-homologous and polymerase theta-mediated end-joining in embryonic stem cells. EMBO J. 36, 3634–3649 (2017).
doi: 10.15252/embj.201796948
Wang, H. & Xu, X. Microhomology-mediated end joining: new players join the team. Cell Biosci. 7, 6 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s13578-017-0136-8
Siebert, R. & Puchta, H. Efficient repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination between directly repeated sequences in the plant genome. Plant Cell 14, 1121–1131 (2002).
doi: 10.1105/tpc.001727
Schmidt, C., Pacher, M. & Puchta, H. Efficient induction of heritable inversions in plant genomes using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant J. 98, 577–589 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14322
Pacher, M., Schmidt-Puchta, W. & Puchta, H. Two unlinked double-strand breaks can induce reciprocal exchanges in plant genomes via homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining. Genetics 175, 21–29 (2007).
doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.065185
Rowley, J. D. Chromosome translocations: dangerous liaisons revisited. Nat. Rev. Cancer 1, 245–250 (2001).
doi: 10.1038/35106108
Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A. Chromosomes and cancer cells. Chromosome Res. 19, 433–444 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s10577-010-9179-y
Bunting, S. F. & Nussenzweig, A. End-joining, translocations and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 443–454 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nrc3537
Lysak, M. A. et al. Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5224–5229 (2006).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510791103
Gabur, I., Chawla, H. S., Snowdon, R. J. & Parkin, I. A. P. Connecting genome structural variation with complex traits in crop plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 733–750 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3233-0
Huefner, N. D., Mizuno, Y., Weil, C. F., Korf, I. & Britt, A. B. Breadth by depth: expanding our understanding of the repair of transposon-induced DNA double strand breaks via deep-sequencing. DNA Repair 10, 1023–1033 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.07.011
Graham, T. G. W., Carney, S. M., Walter, J. C. & Loparo, J. J. A single XLF dimer bridges DNA ends during nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 877–884 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0120-y
Wang, Z.-P. et al. Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation. Genome Biol. 16, 144 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0715-0
Wolter, F., Klemm, J. & Puchta, H. Efficient in planta gene targeting in Arabidopsis using egg cell-specific expression of the Cas9 nuclease of Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J. 94, 735–746 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.13893
Durr, J., Papareddy, R., Nakajima, K. & Gutierrez-Marcos, J. Highly efficient heritable targeted deletions of gene clusters and non-coding regulatory regions in Arabidopsis using CRISPR/Cas9. Sci. Rep. 8, 4443 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22667-1
Miki, D., Zhang, W., Zeng, W., Feng, Z. & Zhu, J.-K. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation. Nat. Commun. 9, 1967 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04416-0
Kazda, A. et al. Chromosome end protection by blunt-ended telomeres. Genes Dev. 26, 1703–1713 (2012).
doi: 10.1101/gad.194944.112
Schiml, S., Fauser, F. & Puchta, H. The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. Plant J. 80, 1139–1150 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.12704
Jia, Q., Bundock, P., Hooykaas, P. J. J. & Pater, Sde Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA integration and gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana non-homologous end-joining mutants. J. Bot. 2012, 1–13 (2012).
doi: 10.1155/2012/989272
Alonso, J. M. et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301, 653–657 (2003).
doi: 10.1126/science.1086391
Clough, S. J. & Bent, A. F. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743 (1998).
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x
Park, J., Lim, K., Kim, J.-S. & Bae, S. Cas-analyzer: an online tool for assessing genome editing results using NGS data. Bioinformatics 33, 286–288 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw561
Lysak, M. A., Fransz, P. F., Ali, H. B. & Schubert, I. Chromosome painting in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 28, 689–697 (2001).
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01194.x
Han, Y., Zhang, T., Thammapichai, P., Weng, Y. & Jiang, J. Chromosome-specific painting in Cucumis species using bulked oligonucleotides. Genetics 200, 771–779 (2015).
doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.177642