Differential effects of disease modifying drugs on peripheral blood B cell subsets: A cross sectional study in multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon-β, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod or natalizumab.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antigens, CD
/ classification
Antigens, CD19
B-Lymphocyte Subsets
/ classification
B-Lymphocytes
/ drug effects
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dimethyl Fumarate
/ administration & dosage
Female
Fingolimod Hydrochloride
/ administration & dosage
Flow Cytometry
Glatiramer Acetate
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Immunologic Memory
/ drug effects
Immunophenotyping
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ administration & dosage
Interferon-beta
/ administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Sclerosis
/ blood
Natalizumab
/ administration & dosage
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
01
03
2020
accepted:
15
06
2020
entrez:
28
7
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
10
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Several disease modifying drugs (DMDs) have been approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), however, little is known about their differential impact on peripheral blood (PB) B cell subsets. We performed a cross sectional study on PB B cells in MS patients treated with interferon-β (n = 25), glatiramer acetate (n = 19), dimethyl fumarate (n = 15), fingolimod (n = 16) or natalizumab (n = 22), untreated MS patients (n = 20), and in patients with non-inflammatory neurological diseases (n = 12). Besides analyzing routine laboratory data, flow cytometry was performed to analyze naïve B cells (CD19+CD20+CD27-IgD+), non-class switched (CD19+CD20+CD27+IgD+) and class-switched memory B cells (CD19+CD20+CD27+IgD-), double negative B cells (CD19+CD20lowCD27-IgD-) and plasmablasts (CD19+CD20lowCD27+CD38++). Treatment associated changes were found for the overall B cell pool as well as for all B cell subsets. Natalizumab increased absolute numbers and percentage of all B cells mainly by expanding the memory B cell pool. Fingolimod decreased absolute numbers of all B cell subsets and the percentage of total B cells. Fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and interferon-β treatments were associated with an increase in the fraction of naïve B cells while class switched and non-class switched memory B cells showed decreased percentages. Our results highlight differential effects of DMDs on the PB B cell compartment. Across the examined treatments, a decreased percentage of memory B cells was found in dimethyl fumarate, interferon-β and fingolimod treated patients which might contribute to the drugs' mode of action in MS. Further studies are necessary to decipher the exact role of B cell subsets during MS pathogenesis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Several disease modifying drugs (DMDs) have been approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), however, little is known about their differential impact on peripheral blood (PB) B cell subsets.
METHODS
We performed a cross sectional study on PB B cells in MS patients treated with interferon-β (n = 25), glatiramer acetate (n = 19), dimethyl fumarate (n = 15), fingolimod (n = 16) or natalizumab (n = 22), untreated MS patients (n = 20), and in patients with non-inflammatory neurological diseases (n = 12). Besides analyzing routine laboratory data, flow cytometry was performed to analyze naïve B cells (CD19+CD20+CD27-IgD+), non-class switched (CD19+CD20+CD27+IgD+) and class-switched memory B cells (CD19+CD20+CD27+IgD-), double negative B cells (CD19+CD20lowCD27-IgD-) and plasmablasts (CD19+CD20lowCD27+CD38++).
RESULTS
Treatment associated changes were found for the overall B cell pool as well as for all B cell subsets. Natalizumab increased absolute numbers and percentage of all B cells mainly by expanding the memory B cell pool. Fingolimod decreased absolute numbers of all B cell subsets and the percentage of total B cells. Fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and interferon-β treatments were associated with an increase in the fraction of naïve B cells while class switched and non-class switched memory B cells showed decreased percentages.
CONCLUSION
Our results highlight differential effects of DMDs on the PB B cell compartment. Across the examined treatments, a decreased percentage of memory B cells was found in dimethyl fumarate, interferon-β and fingolimod treated patients which might contribute to the drugs' mode of action in MS. Further studies are necessary to decipher the exact role of B cell subsets during MS pathogenesis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32716916
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235449
pii: PONE-D-20-06004
pmc: PMC7384624
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, CD
0
Antigens, CD19
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Natalizumab
0
Glatiramer Acetate
5M691HL4BO
Interferon-beta
77238-31-4
Dimethyl Fumarate
FO2303MNI2
Fingolimod Hydrochloride
G926EC510T
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0235449Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: C.L. Kemmerer: reports no disclosures. V. Pernpeitner: reports no disclosures. C. Ruschil: reports no disclosures. A. Abdelhak: received research funding from the German multiple sclerosis society (DMSG) as well as travel grants from Teva and Novartis all not related to this work. M. Scholl: reports no disclosures. U. Ziemann: UZ has received honoraria from Biogen Idec GmbH, Bayer Vital GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb GmbH, Pfizer, CorTec GmbH, Medtronic GmbH, and grants from European Research Council, German Research Foundation, German Ministry of Education and Research, Biogen Idec GmbH, Servier, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals NV, all not related to this work. M. Krumbholz: receives financial support from Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Biogen, Celgene and Roche, not related to this study. B. Hemmer has served on scientific advisory boards for Novartis; he has served as DMSC member for AllergyCare and TG therapeutics; he or his institution have received speaker honoraria from Desitin; holds part of two patents; one for the detection of antibodies against KIR4.1 in a subpopulation of MS patients and one for genetic determinants of neutralizing antibodies to interferon. All conflicts are not relevant to the topic of the study. M.C. Kowarik: receives financial support from Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Biogen, Celgene and Roche, not related to this study. The competing interests do not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Ann Neurol. 2006 May;59(5):743-7
pubmed: 16634029
Neurology. 2019 Apr 9;92(15):e1724-e1738
pubmed: 30918100
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Apr;13(4):353-63
pubmed: 24613349
J Immunol. 2016 Dec 15;197(12):4576-4583
pubmed: 27837111
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017 May 09;4(6):369-380
pubmed: 28589164
Eur J Immunol. 2010 Oct;40(10):2942-56
pubmed: 20812237
J Neuroinflammation. 2012 May 16;9:93
pubmed: 22591862
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Aug 6;6(248):248ra106
pubmed: 25100740
Nature. 1992 Mar 5;356(6364):63-6
pubmed: 1538783
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Aug 6;6(248):248ra107
pubmed: 25100741
Neurology. 1998 Sep;51(3):682-9
pubmed: 9748010
EBioMedicine. 2017 Feb;16:41-50
pubmed: 28161400
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016 Dec 15;4(1):e309
pubmed: 28053999
Mult Scler. 2018 Jul;24(8):1014-1022
pubmed: 29774781
CNS Drugs. 2020 Apr;34(4):425-432
pubmed: 32193826
Drugs. 2016 Jul;76(11):1067-79
pubmed: 27318702
Brain. 2005 Jul;128(Pt 7):1667-76
pubmed: 15800022
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173
pubmed: 29275977
J Immunol. 2017 Jan 15;198(2):691-698
pubmed: 27974457
Neurology. 2011 Apr 5;76(14):1214-21
pubmed: 21464424
J Neurol. 2018 May;265(5):1199-1209
pubmed: 29550884
Immunol Cell Biol. 2016 Oct;94(9):886-894
pubmed: 27265253
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 27;101(30):11064-9
pubmed: 15263096
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302
pubmed: 21387374
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 2;348(1):15-23
pubmed: 12510038
J Autoimmun. 2014 Nov;54:81-92
pubmed: 24934599
Sci Rep. 2018 May 29;8(1):8194
pubmed: 29844361
Neurology. 2008 Oct 21;71(17):1350-4
pubmed: 18936427
J Autoimmun. 2011 Dec;37(4):289-99
pubmed: 21924866
J Mult Scler (Foster City). 2015 May;2(2):
pubmed: 26137596
J Neuroinflammation. 2019 Nov 16;16(1):228
pubmed: 31733652
Cell. 2018 Sep 20;175(1):85-100.e23
pubmed: 30173916
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Nov;71(11):1421-8
pubmed: 25264704
J Neuroimmunol. 2013 Sep 15;262(1-2):92-9
pubmed: 23856341
Science. 2002 Jul 19;297(5580):409-12
pubmed: 12130787
Inflammopharmacology. 2012 Feb;20(1):1-18
pubmed: 22205271
J Clin Immunol. 2010 Jan;30(1):99-105
pubmed: 19763798
Eur J Immunol. 2012 Mar;42(3):790-8
pubmed: 22144343
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Oct;31(9):1588-90
pubmed: 20688889
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 31;9(10):e111115
pubmed: 25360562
Mult Scler. 2014 Sep;20(10):1371-80
pubmed: 24526661
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):221-234
pubmed: 28002679
CNS Drugs. 2018 Nov;32(11):1039-1051
pubmed: 30315499