Mechanisms of stretch-mediated skin expansion at single-cell resolution.
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
/ metabolism
Adherens Junctions
/ metabolism
Animals
Base Sequence
Cell Cycle Proteins
/ metabolism
Cell Differentiation
/ drug effects
Cell Self Renewal
/ drug effects
Chromatin
/ drug effects
Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly
/ drug effects
Clone Cells
/ cytology
Disease Models, Animal
Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases
/ metabolism
Gene Regulatory Networks
/ drug effects
Hydrogels
/ administration & dosage
Mechanotransduction, Cellular
/ drug effects
Mice
Mice, Transgenic
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Mutation
RNA, Messenger
/ genetics
RNA-Seq
Single-Cell Analysis
Skin
/ cytology
Stem Cells
/ cytology
Trans-Activators
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Transcription Factor AP-1
/ metabolism
Transcription, Genetic
/ drug effects
YAP-Signaling Proteins
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
19
02
2019
accepted:
19
06
2020
pubmed:
31
7
2020
medline:
15
9
2020
entrez:
31
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The ability of the skin to grow in response to stretching has been exploited in reconstructive surgery
Identifiants
pubmed: 32728211
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2555-7
pii: 10.1038/s41586-020-2555-7
pmc: PMC7116042
mid: EMS94010
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
0
Cell Cycle Proteins
0
Chromatin
0
Hydrogels
0
Mrtfa protein, mouse
0
RNA, Messenger
0
Trans-Activators
0
Transcription Factor AP-1
0
YAP-Signaling Proteins
0
Yap1 protein, mouse
0
Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases
EC 2.7.11.24
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
EC 2.7.12.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
268-273Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_12009
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 092096
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 098357/Z/12/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17230
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 616333
Pays : International
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Zöllner, A. M., Holland, M. A., Honda, K. S., Gosain, A. K. & Kuhl, E. Growth on demand: reviewing the mechanobiology of stretched skin. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 28, 495–509 (2013).
pubmed: 23623569
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.018
Le, H. Q. et al. Mechanical regulation of transcription controls Polycomb-mediated gene silencing during lineage commitment. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 864–875 (2016).
pubmed: 27398909
doi: 10.1038/ncb3387
Nava, M. M. et al. Heterochromatin-driven nuclear softening protects the genome against mechanical stress-induced damage. Cell 181, 800–817 (2020).
pubmed: 32302590
pmcid: 7237863
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.052
Iskratsch, T., Wolfenson, H. & Sheetz, M. P. Appreciating force and shape—the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 825–833 (2014).
pubmed: 25355507
doi: 10.1038/nrm3903
LeGoff, L. & Lecuit, T. Mechanical forces and growth in animal tissues. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a019232 (2016).
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019232
pmcid: 4772101
Kirby, T. J. & Lammerding, J. Emerging views of the nucleus as a cellular mechanosensor. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 373–381 (2018).
pubmed: 29467443
pmcid: 6440800
doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0038-y
Vining, K. H. & Mooney, D. J. Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 728–742 (2017).
pubmed: 29115301
pmcid: 5803560
doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.108
Blanpain, C. & Fuchs, E. Plasticity of epithelial stem cells in tissue regeneration. Science 344, 1242281 (2014).
pubmed: 24926024
pmcid: 4523269
doi: 10.1126/science.1242281
Obdeijn, M. C., Nicolai, J. P. & Werker, P. M. The osmotic tissue expander: a three-year clinical experience. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 62, 1219–1222 (2009).
pubmed: 18755643
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.12.088
Wickström, S. A. & Niessen, C. M. Cell adhesion and mechanics as drivers of tissue organization and differentiation: local cues for large scale organization. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 54, 89–97 (2018).
pubmed: 29864721
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.05.003
Yonemura, S., Wada, Y., Watanabe, T., Nagafuchi, A. & Shibata, M. α-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 533–542 (2010).
pubmed: 20453849
doi: 10.1038/ncb2055
Clayton, E. et al. A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis. Nature 446, 185–189 (2007).
pubmed: 17330052
doi: 10.1038/nature05574
Mascré, G. et al. Distinct contribution of stem and progenitor cells to epidermal maintenance. Nature 489, 257–262 (2012).
pubmed: 22940863
doi: 10.1038/nature11393
Sánchez-Danés, A. et al. Defining the clonal dynamics leading to mouse skin tumour initiation. Nature 536, 298–303 (2016).
pubmed: 27459053
pmcid: 5068560
doi: 10.1038/nature19069
Lim, X. et al. Interfollicular epidermal stem cells self-renew via autocrine Wnt signaling. Science 342, 1226–1230 (2013).
pubmed: 24311688
pmcid: 4081860
doi: 10.1126/science.1239730
Rompolas, P. et al. Spatiotemporal coordination of stem cell commitment during epidermal homeostasis. Science 352, 1471–1474 (2016).
pubmed: 27229141
pmcid: 4958018
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7012
Mesa, K. R. et al. Homeostatic epidermal stem cell self-renewal is driven by local differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 23, 677–686 (2018).
pubmed: 30269903
pmcid: 6214709
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.09.005
Aragona, M. et al. Defining stem cell dynamics and migration during wound healing in mouse skin epidermis. Nat. Commun. 8, 14684 (2017).
pubmed: 28248284
pmcid: 5339881
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14684
Eferl, R. & Wagner, E. F. AP-1: a double-edged sword in tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 859–868 (2003).
pubmed: 14668816
doi: 10.1038/nrc1209
Botchkarev, V. A. & Flores, E. R. p53/p63/p73 in the epidermis in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a015248 (2014).
pubmed: 25085956
pmcid: 4109579
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015248
Lopez, R. G. et al. C/EBPα and β couple interfollicular keratinocyte proliferation arrest to commitment and terminal differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1181–1190 (2009).
pubmed: 19749746
doi: 10.1038/ncb1960
Segre, J. A., Bauer, C. & Fuchs, E. Klf4 is a transcription factor required for establishing the barrier function of the skin. Nat. Genet. 22, 356–360 (1999).
pubmed: 10431239
doi: 10.1038/11926
Hopkin, A. S. et al. GRHL3/GET1 and trithorax group members collaborate to activate the epidermal progenitor differentiation program. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002829 (2012).
pubmed: 22829784
pmcid: 3400561
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002829
Joost, S. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals that differentiation and spatial signatures shape epidermal and hair follicle heterogeneity. Cell Syst. 3, 221–237 (2016).
pubmed: 27641957
pmcid: 5052454
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.08.010
Joost, S. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of traced epidermal and hair follicle stem cells reveals rapid adaptations during wound healing. Cell Rep. 25, 585–597 (2018).
pubmed: 30332640
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.059
Aibar, S. & Gonzalez-Blas, C. B. SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering. Nat. Methods 14, 1083–1086 (2017).
pubmed: 28991892
pmcid: 5937676
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4463
Street, K. et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genomics 19, 477 (2018).
pubmed: 29914354
pmcid: 6007078
doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4772-0
Rottner, K., Faix, J., Bogdan, S., Linder, S. & Kerkhoff, E. Actin assembly mechanisms at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 130, 3427–3435 (2017).
pubmed: 29032357
doi: 10.1242/jcs.206433
Duda, M. et al. Polarization of myosin ii refines tissue material properties to buffer mechanical stress. Dev. Cell 48, 245–260 (2019).
pubmed: 30695698
pmcid: 6353629
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.12.020
Yang, K. et al. YAP and ERK mediated mechanical strain-induced cell cycle progression through RhoA and cytoskeletal dynamics in rat growth plate chondrocytes. J. Orthop. Res. 34, 1121–1129 (2016).
pubmed: 26694636
doi: 10.1002/jor.23138
Hirata, H. et al. Actomyosin bundles serve as a tension sensor and a platform for ERK activation. EMBO Rep. 16, 250–257 (2015).
pubmed: 25550404
doi: 10.15252/embr.201439140
Panciera, T., Azzolin, L., Cordenonsi, M. & Piccolo, S. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 758–770 (2017).
pubmed: 28951564
pmcid: 6192510
doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.87
Posern, G. & Treisman, R. Actin’ together: serum response factor, its cofactors and the link to signal transduction. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 588–596 (2006).
pubmed: 17035020
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.09.008
Rognoni, E. & Walko, G. The roles of YAP/TAZ and the Hippo pathway in healthy and diseased skin. Cells 8, 411 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/cells8050411
pmcid: 6562585
Luxenburg, C., Pasolli, H. A., Williams, S. E. & Fuchs, E. Developmental roles for Srf, cortical cytoskeleton and cell shape in epidermal spindle orientation. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 203–214 (2011).
pubmed: 21336301
pmcid: 3278337
doi: 10.1038/ncb2163
Connelly, J. T. et al. Actin and serum response factor transduce physical cues from the microenvironment to regulate epidermal stem cell fate decisions. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 711–718 (2010).
pubmed: 20581838
doi: 10.1038/ncb2074
Aragona, M. et al. A mechanical checkpoint controls multicellular growth through YAP/TAZ regulation by actin-processing factors. Cell 154, 1047–1059 (2013).
pubmed: 23954413
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.042
Whitson, R. J. et al. Noncanonical hedgehog pathway activation through SRF–MKL1 promotes drug resistance in basal cell carcinomas. Nat. Med. 24, 271–281 (2018).
pubmed: 29400712
pmcid: 5839965
doi: 10.1038/nm.4476
Miroshnikova, Y. A. et al. Adhesion forces and cortical tension couple cell proliferation and differentiation to drive epidermal stratification. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 69–80 (2018).
pubmed: 29230016
doi: 10.1038/s41556-017-0005-z
Mamidi, A. et al. Mechanosignalling via integrins directs fate decisions of pancreatic progenitors. Nature 564, 114–118 (2018).
pubmed: 30487608
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0762-2
Moreno, E., Valon, L., Levillayer, F. & Levayer, R. Competition for space induces cell elimination through compaction-driven ERK downregulation. Curr. Biol. 29, 23–28 (2019).
pubmed: 30554899
pmcid: 6331351
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.007
Vasioukhin, V., Degenstein, L., Wise, B. & Fuchs, E. The magical touch: genome targeting in epidermal stem cells induced by tamoxifen application to mouse skin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8551–8556 (1999).
pubmed: 10411913
pmcid: 17554
doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8551
Vasioukhin, V., Bauer, C., Degenstein, L., Wise, B. & Fuchs, E. Hyperproliferation and defects in epithelial polarity upon conditional ablation of alpha-catenin in skin. Cell 104, 605–617 (2001).
pubmed: 11239416
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00246-X
Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144 (2010).
pubmed: 20887898
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.016
Xin, M. et al. Hippo pathway effector Yap promotes cardiac regeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13839–13844 (2013).
pubmed: 23918388
pmcid: 3752208
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313192110
Damiani, D., Goffinet, A. M., Alberts, A. & Tissir, F. Lack of Diaph3 relaxes the spindle checkpoint causing the loss of neural progenitors. Nat. Commun. 7, 13509 (2016).
pubmed: 27848932
pmcid: 5476800
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13509
Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007).
pubmed: 17868096
doi: 10.1002/dvg.20335
Tepole, A. B., Gart, M., Purnell, C. A., Gosain, A. K. & Kuhl, E. The incompatibility of living systems: characterizing growth-induced incompatibilities in expanded skin. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44, 1734–1752 (2016).
pubmed: 26416721
doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1467-4
Susaki, E. A. et al. Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using chemical cocktails and computational analysis. Cell 157, 726–739 (2014).
pubmed: 24746791
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.042
Ellis, S. J. et al. Distinct modes of cell competition shape mammalian tissue morphogenesis. Nature 569, 497–502 (2019).
pubmed: 31092920
pmcid: 6638572
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1199-y
Gonzalez-Roca, E. et al. Accurate expression profiling of very small cell populations. PLoS ONE 5, e14418 (2010).
pubmed: 21203435
pmcid: 3010985
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014418
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
pubmed: 22388286
pmcid: 3322381
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
pubmed: 19505943
pmcid: 2723002
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
pubmed: 18798982
pmcid: 2592715
doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).
pubmed: 25260700
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638
McLean, C. Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495–501 (2010).
pubmed: 20436461
pmcid: 4840234
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1630
Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
pubmed: 20513432
pmcid: 2898526
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004
McCarthy, D. J., Campbell, K. R., Lun, A. T. & Wills, Q. F. Scater: pre-processing, quality control, normalization and visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data in R. Bioinformatics 33, 1179–1186 (2017).
pubmed: 28088763
pmcid: 5408845
Lun, A. T., Bach, K. & Marioni, J. C. Pooling across cells to normalize single-cell RNA sequencing data with many zero counts. Genome Biol. 17, 75 (2016).
pubmed: 27122128
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0947-7
Scialdone, A. et al. Computational assignment of cell-cycle stage from single-cell transcriptome data. Methods 85, 54–61 (2015).
pubmed: 26142758
doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.06.021
Becht, E. et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 38–44 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/nbt.4314
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902 (2019).
pubmed: 31178118
pmcid: 6687398
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031