Mechanisms of stretch-mediated skin expansion at single-cell resolution.


Journal

Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 19 02 2019
accepted: 19 06 2020
pubmed: 31 7 2020
medline: 15 9 2020
entrez: 31 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The ability of the skin to grow in response to stretching has been exploited in reconstructive surgery

Identifiants

pubmed: 32728211
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2555-7
pii: 10.1038/s41586-020-2555-7
pmc: PMC7116042
mid: EMS94010
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing 0
Cell Cycle Proteins 0
Chromatin 0
Hydrogels 0
Mrtfa protein, mouse 0
RNA, Messenger 0
Trans-Activators 0
Transcription Factor AP-1 0
YAP-Signaling Proteins 0
Yap1 protein, mouse 0
Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases EC 2.7.11.24
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases EC 2.7.12.2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

268-273

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_12009
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 092096
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 098357/Z/12/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17230
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 616333
Pays : International

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Références

Zöllner, A. M., Holland, M. A., Honda, K. S., Gosain, A. K. & Kuhl, E. Growth on demand: reviewing the mechanobiology of stretched skin. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 28, 495–509 (2013).
pubmed: 23623569 doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.018
Le, H. Q. et al. Mechanical regulation of transcription controls Polycomb-mediated gene silencing during lineage commitment. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 864–875 (2016).
pubmed: 27398909 doi: 10.1038/ncb3387
Nava, M. M. et al. Heterochromatin-driven nuclear softening protects the genome against mechanical stress-induced damage. Cell 181, 800–817 (2020).
pubmed: 32302590 pmcid: 7237863 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.052
Iskratsch, T., Wolfenson, H. & Sheetz, M. P. Appreciating force and shape—the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 825–833 (2014).
pubmed: 25355507 doi: 10.1038/nrm3903
LeGoff, L. & Lecuit, T. Mechanical forces and growth in animal tissues. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a019232 (2016).
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019232 pmcid: 4772101
Kirby, T. J. & Lammerding, J. Emerging views of the nucleus as a cellular mechanosensor. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 373–381 (2018).
pubmed: 29467443 pmcid: 6440800 doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0038-y
Vining, K. H. & Mooney, D. J. Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 728–742 (2017).
pubmed: 29115301 pmcid: 5803560 doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.108
Blanpain, C. & Fuchs, E. Plasticity of epithelial stem cells in tissue regeneration. Science 344, 1242281 (2014).
pubmed: 24926024 pmcid: 4523269 doi: 10.1126/science.1242281
Obdeijn, M. C., Nicolai, J. P. & Werker, P. M. The osmotic tissue expander: a three-year clinical experience. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 62, 1219–1222 (2009).
pubmed: 18755643 doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.12.088
Wickström, S. A. & Niessen, C. M. Cell adhesion and mechanics as drivers of tissue organization and differentiation: local cues for large scale organization. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 54, 89–97 (2018).
pubmed: 29864721 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.05.003
Yonemura, S., Wada, Y., Watanabe, T., Nagafuchi, A. & Shibata, M. α-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 533–542 (2010).
pubmed: 20453849 doi: 10.1038/ncb2055
Clayton, E. et al. A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis. Nature 446, 185–189 (2007).
pubmed: 17330052 doi: 10.1038/nature05574
Mascré, G. et al. Distinct contribution of stem and progenitor cells to epidermal maintenance. Nature 489, 257–262 (2012).
pubmed: 22940863 doi: 10.1038/nature11393
Sánchez-Danés, A. et al. Defining the clonal dynamics leading to mouse skin tumour initiation. Nature 536, 298–303 (2016).
pubmed: 27459053 pmcid: 5068560 doi: 10.1038/nature19069
Lim, X. et al. Interfollicular epidermal stem cells self-renew via autocrine Wnt signaling. Science 342, 1226–1230 (2013).
pubmed: 24311688 pmcid: 4081860 doi: 10.1126/science.1239730
Rompolas, P. et al. Spatiotemporal coordination of stem cell commitment during epidermal homeostasis. Science 352, 1471–1474 (2016).
pubmed: 27229141 pmcid: 4958018 doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7012
Mesa, K. R. et al. Homeostatic epidermal stem cell self-renewal is driven by local differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 23, 677–686 (2018).
pubmed: 30269903 pmcid: 6214709 doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.09.005
Aragona, M. et al. Defining stem cell dynamics and migration during wound healing in mouse skin epidermis. Nat. Commun. 8, 14684 (2017).
pubmed: 28248284 pmcid: 5339881 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14684
Eferl, R. & Wagner, E. F. AP-1: a double-edged sword in tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 859–868 (2003).
pubmed: 14668816 doi: 10.1038/nrc1209
Botchkarev, V. A. & Flores, E. R. p53/p63/p73 in the epidermis in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a015248 (2014).
pubmed: 25085956 pmcid: 4109579 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015248
Lopez, R. G. et al. C/EBPα and β couple interfollicular keratinocyte proliferation arrest to commitment and terminal differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1181–1190 (2009).
pubmed: 19749746 doi: 10.1038/ncb1960
Segre, J. A., Bauer, C. & Fuchs, E. Klf4 is a transcription factor required for establishing the barrier function of the skin. Nat. Genet. 22, 356–360 (1999).
pubmed: 10431239 doi: 10.1038/11926
Hopkin, A. S. et al. GRHL3/GET1 and trithorax group members collaborate to activate the epidermal progenitor differentiation program. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002829 (2012).
pubmed: 22829784 pmcid: 3400561 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002829
Joost, S. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals that differentiation and spatial signatures shape epidermal and hair follicle heterogeneity. Cell Syst. 3, 221–237 (2016).
pubmed: 27641957 pmcid: 5052454 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.08.010
Joost, S. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of traced epidermal and hair follicle stem cells reveals rapid adaptations during wound healing. Cell Rep. 25, 585–597 (2018).
pubmed: 30332640 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.059
Aibar, S. & Gonzalez-Blas, C. B. SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering. Nat. Methods 14, 1083–1086 (2017).
pubmed: 28991892 pmcid: 5937676 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4463
Street, K. et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genomics 19, 477 (2018).
pubmed: 29914354 pmcid: 6007078 doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4772-0
Rottner, K., Faix, J., Bogdan, S., Linder, S. & Kerkhoff, E. Actin assembly mechanisms at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 130, 3427–3435 (2017).
pubmed: 29032357 doi: 10.1242/jcs.206433
Duda, M. et al. Polarization of myosin ii refines tissue material properties to buffer mechanical stress. Dev. Cell 48, 245–260 (2019).
pubmed: 30695698 pmcid: 6353629 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.12.020
Yang, K. et al. YAP and ERK mediated mechanical strain-induced cell cycle progression through RhoA and cytoskeletal dynamics in rat growth plate chondrocytes. J. Orthop. Res. 34, 1121–1129 (2016).
pubmed: 26694636 doi: 10.1002/jor.23138
Hirata, H. et al. Actomyosin bundles serve as a tension sensor and a platform for ERK activation. EMBO Rep. 16, 250–257 (2015).
pubmed: 25550404 doi: 10.15252/embr.201439140
Panciera, T., Azzolin, L., Cordenonsi, M. & Piccolo, S. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 758–770 (2017).
pubmed: 28951564 pmcid: 6192510 doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.87
Posern, G. & Treisman, R. Actin’ together: serum response factor, its cofactors and the link to signal transduction. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 588–596 (2006).
pubmed: 17035020 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.09.008
Rognoni, E. & Walko, G. The roles of YAP/TAZ and the Hippo pathway in healthy and diseased skin. Cells 8, 411 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/cells8050411 pmcid: 6562585
Luxenburg, C., Pasolli, H. A., Williams, S. E. & Fuchs, E. Developmental roles for Srf, cortical cytoskeleton and cell shape in epidermal spindle orientation. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 203–214 (2011).
pubmed: 21336301 pmcid: 3278337 doi: 10.1038/ncb2163
Connelly, J. T. et al. Actin and serum response factor transduce physical cues from the microenvironment to regulate epidermal stem cell fate decisions. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 711–718 (2010).
pubmed: 20581838 doi: 10.1038/ncb2074
Aragona, M. et al. A mechanical checkpoint controls multicellular growth through YAP/TAZ regulation by actin-processing factors. Cell 154, 1047–1059 (2013).
pubmed: 23954413 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.042
Whitson, R. J. et al. Noncanonical hedgehog pathway activation through SRF–MKL1 promotes drug resistance in basal cell carcinomas. Nat. Med. 24, 271–281 (2018).
pubmed: 29400712 pmcid: 5839965 doi: 10.1038/nm.4476
Miroshnikova, Y. A. et al. Adhesion forces and cortical tension couple cell proliferation and differentiation to drive epidermal stratification. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 69–80 (2018).
pubmed: 29230016 doi: 10.1038/s41556-017-0005-z
Mamidi, A. et al. Mechanosignalling via integrins directs fate decisions of pancreatic progenitors. Nature 564, 114–118 (2018).
pubmed: 30487608 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0762-2
Moreno, E., Valon, L., Levillayer, F. & Levayer, R. Competition for space induces cell elimination through compaction-driven ERK downregulation. Curr. Biol. 29, 23–28 (2019).
pubmed: 30554899 pmcid: 6331351 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.007
Vasioukhin, V., Degenstein, L., Wise, B. & Fuchs, E. The magical touch: genome targeting in epidermal stem cells induced by tamoxifen application to mouse skin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8551–8556 (1999).
pubmed: 10411913 pmcid: 17554 doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8551
Vasioukhin, V., Bauer, C., Degenstein, L., Wise, B. & Fuchs, E. Hyperproliferation and defects in epithelial polarity upon conditional ablation of alpha-catenin in skin. Cell 104, 605–617 (2001).
pubmed: 11239416 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00246-X
Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144 (2010).
pubmed: 20887898 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.016
Xin, M. et al. Hippo pathway effector Yap promotes cardiac regeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13839–13844 (2013).
pubmed: 23918388 pmcid: 3752208 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313192110
Damiani, D., Goffinet, A. M., Alberts, A. & Tissir, F. Lack of Diaph3 relaxes the spindle checkpoint causing the loss of neural progenitors. Nat. Commun. 7, 13509 (2016).
pubmed: 27848932 pmcid: 5476800 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13509
Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007).
pubmed: 17868096 doi: 10.1002/dvg.20335
Tepole, A. B., Gart, M., Purnell, C. A., Gosain, A. K. & Kuhl, E. The incompatibility of living systems: characterizing growth-induced incompatibilities in expanded skin. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44, 1734–1752 (2016).
pubmed: 26416721 doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1467-4
Susaki, E. A. et al. Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using chemical cocktails and computational analysis. Cell 157, 726–739 (2014).
pubmed: 24746791 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.042
Ellis, S. J. et al. Distinct modes of cell competition shape mammalian tissue morphogenesis. Nature 569, 497–502 (2019).
pubmed: 31092920 pmcid: 6638572 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1199-y
Gonzalez-Roca, E. et al. Accurate expression profiling of very small cell populations. PLoS ONE 5, e14418 (2010).
pubmed: 21203435 pmcid: 3010985 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014418
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
pubmed: 22388286 pmcid: 3322381 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
pubmed: 19505943 pmcid: 2723002 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
pubmed: 18798982 pmcid: 2592715 doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).
pubmed: 25260700 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638
McLean, C. Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495–501 (2010).
pubmed: 20436461 pmcid: 4840234 doi: 10.1038/nbt.1630
Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
pubmed: 20513432 pmcid: 2898526 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004
McCarthy, D. J., Campbell, K. R., Lun, A. T. & Wills, Q. F. Scater: pre-processing, quality control, normalization and visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data in R. Bioinformatics 33, 1179–1186 (2017).
pubmed: 28088763 pmcid: 5408845
Lun, A. T., Bach, K. & Marioni, J. C. Pooling across cells to normalize single-cell RNA sequencing data with many zero counts. Genome Biol. 17, 75 (2016).
pubmed: 27122128 doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0947-7
Scialdone, A. et al. Computational assignment of cell-cycle stage from single-cell transcriptome data. Methods 85, 54–61 (2015).
pubmed: 26142758 doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.06.021
Becht, E. et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 38–44 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/nbt.4314
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902 (2019).
pubmed: 31178118 pmcid: 6687398 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031

Auteurs

Mariaceleste Aragona (M)

Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cancer, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Alejandro Sifrim (A)

Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sanger Institute-EBI Single-Cell Genomics Centre, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.

Milan Malfait (M)

Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cancer, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Yura Song (Y)

Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cancer, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Jens Van Herck (J)

Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sanger Institute-EBI Single-Cell Genomics Centre, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.

Sophie Dekoninck (S)

Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cancer, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Souhir Gargouri (S)

Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cancer, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Gaëlle Lapouge (G)

Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cancer, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Benjamin Swedlund (B)

Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cancer, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Christine Dubois (C)

Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cancer, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Pieter Baatsen (P)

Electron Microscopy Platform of VIB Bio Imaging Core, Leuven, Belgium.

Katlijn Vints (K)

Electron Microscopy Platform of VIB Bio Imaging Core, Leuven, Belgium.

Seungmin Han (S)

The Wellcome Trust-Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Fadel Tissir (F)

Université Catholique de Louvain, Institute of Neuroscience, Developmental Neurobiology, Brussels, Belgium.

Thierry Voet (T)

Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sanger Institute-EBI Single-Cell Genomics Centre, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.

Benjamin D Simons (BD)

The Wellcome Trust-Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. bds10@cam.ac.uk.
Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. bds10@cam.ac.uk.
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. bds10@cam.ac.uk.

Cédric Blanpain (C)

Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cancer, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. cedric.blanpain@ulb.ac.be.
WELBIO, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. cedric.blanpain@ulb.ac.be.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH