Vibrionaceae core, shell and cloud genes are non-randomly distributed on Chr 1: An hypothesis that links the genomic location of genes with their intracellular placement.
Aliivibrio salmonicida
Gene dosage
Genome architecture
Pangenome
Vibrio natriegens
Vibrionaceae
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Oct 2020
06 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
09
06
2020
accepted:
29
09
2020
entrez:
7
10
2020
pubmed:
8
10
2020
medline:
13
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The genome of Vibrionaceae bacteria, which consists of two circular chromosomes, is replicated in a highly ordered fashion. In fast-growing bacteria, multifork replication results in higher gene copy numbers and increased expression of genes located close to the origin of replication of Chr 1 (ori1). This is believed to be a growth optimization strategy to satisfy the high demand of essential growth factors during fast growth. The relationship between ori1-proximate growth-related genes and gene expression during fast growth has been investigated by many researchers. However, it remains unclear which other gene categories that are present close to ori1 and if expression of all ori1-proximate genes is increased during fast growth, or if expression is selectively elevated for certain gene categories. We calculated the pangenome of all complete genomes from the Vibrionaceae family and mapped the four pangene categories, core, softcore, shell and cloud, to their chromosomal positions. This revealed that core and softcore genes were found heavily biased towards ori1, while shell genes were overrepresented at the opposite part of Chr 1 (i.e., close to ter1). RNA-seq of Aliivibrio salmonicida and Vibrio natriegens showed global gene expression patterns that consistently correlated with chromosomal distance to ori1. Despite a biased gene distribution pattern, all pangene categories contributed to a skewed expression pattern at fast-growing conditions, whereas at slow-growing conditions, softcore, shell and cloud genes were responsible for elevated expression. The pangene categories were non-randomly organized on Chr 1, with an overrepresentation of core and softcore genes around ori1, and overrepresentation of shell and cloud genes around ter1. Furthermore, we mapped our gene distribution data on to the intracellular positioning of chromatin described for V. cholerae, and found that core/softcore and shell/cloud genes appear enriched at two spatially separated intracellular regions. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that there is a link between the genomic location of genes and their cellular placement.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The genome of Vibrionaceae bacteria, which consists of two circular chromosomes, is replicated in a highly ordered fashion. In fast-growing bacteria, multifork replication results in higher gene copy numbers and increased expression of genes located close to the origin of replication of Chr 1 (ori1). This is believed to be a growth optimization strategy to satisfy the high demand of essential growth factors during fast growth. The relationship between ori1-proximate growth-related genes and gene expression during fast growth has been investigated by many researchers. However, it remains unclear which other gene categories that are present close to ori1 and if expression of all ori1-proximate genes is increased during fast growth, or if expression is selectively elevated for certain gene categories.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We calculated the pangenome of all complete genomes from the Vibrionaceae family and mapped the four pangene categories, core, softcore, shell and cloud, to their chromosomal positions. This revealed that core and softcore genes were found heavily biased towards ori1, while shell genes were overrepresented at the opposite part of Chr 1 (i.e., close to ter1). RNA-seq of Aliivibrio salmonicida and Vibrio natriegens showed global gene expression patterns that consistently correlated with chromosomal distance to ori1. Despite a biased gene distribution pattern, all pangene categories contributed to a skewed expression pattern at fast-growing conditions, whereas at slow-growing conditions, softcore, shell and cloud genes were responsible for elevated expression.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The pangene categories were non-randomly organized on Chr 1, with an overrepresentation of core and softcore genes around ori1, and overrepresentation of shell and cloud genes around ter1. Furthermore, we mapped our gene distribution data on to the intracellular positioning of chromatin described for V. cholerae, and found that core/softcore and shell/cloud genes appear enriched at two spatially separated intracellular regions. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that there is a link between the genomic location of genes and their cellular placement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33023476
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07117-5
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-07117-5
pmc: PMC7542380
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
695Références
BMC Biol. 2020 Apr 29;18(1):43
pubmed: 32349767
Mol Microbiol. 2007 Nov;66(4):1016-28
pubmed: 17944831
Cell. 2017 Jan 12;168(1-2):172-185.e15
pubmed: 28086090
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Dec;79(24):7696-701
pubmed: 24096415
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2016 Jun;40:60-65
pubmed: 26942688
PLoS Genet. 2008 Sep 26;4(9):e1000201
pubmed: 18818731
Mol Microbiol. 2006 Mar;59(5):1506-18
pubmed: 16468991
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004 Sep;68(3):403-31, table of contents
pubmed: 15353563
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 8;116(41):20489-20499
pubmed: 31548377
PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Jun;1(1):e12
pubmed: 16103901
Evol Bioinform Online. 2013;9:127-36
pubmed: 23531787
Biophys Rev. 2016 Sep;8(3):209-220
pubmed: 28510224
Trends Microbiol. 2016 Oct;24(10):788-800
pubmed: 27364121
BMC Genomics. 2008 Nov 26;9:559
pubmed: 19032792
PeerJ. 2017 Jul 13;5:e3461
pubmed: 28717590
Mol Microbiol. 2005 Jun;56(5):1129-38
pubmed: 15882408
Microb Pathog. 2001 Nov;31(5):213-9
pubmed: 11710841
Cell. 2018 Mar 8;172(6):1271-1293
pubmed: 29522747
Microbiology (Reading). 2011 Mar;157(Pt 3):695-708
pubmed: 21163839
Science. 2013 Nov 8;342(6159):731-4
pubmed: 24158908
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 1;116(40):20115-20123
pubmed: 31527272
PLoS Genet. 2018 Mar 5;14(3):e1007251
pubmed: 29505558
EMBO J. 2007 Jul 11;26(13):3124-31
pubmed: 17557077
J Mol Biol. 1968 Feb 14;31(3):519-40
pubmed: 4866337
J Struct Biol. 2006 Nov;156(2):284-91
pubmed: 16934488
J Bacteriol. 2005 Jan;187(2):752-7
pubmed: 15629946
PLoS Genet. 2014 Jul 10;10(7):e1004448
pubmed: 25010199
J Bacteriol. 1962 Apr;83:736-7
pubmed: 13888946
Mar Environ Res. 2020 Feb;154:104850
pubmed: 32056705
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 05;9:1115
pubmed: 29922250
Microbiology (Reading). 2004 Jun;150(Pt 6):1609-1627
pubmed: 15184548
Can J Microbiol. 1991 Aug;37(8):618-23
pubmed: 1954575
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1639-45
pubmed: 19541911
BMC Genomics. 2008 Feb 08;9:75
pubmed: 18261238
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 12;10(1):5131
pubmed: 31719538
Environ Microbiol. 2020 Jun 14;:
pubmed: 32537803
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D19-21
pubmed: 21062823
J Bacteriol. 1996 Oct;178(19):5563-7
pubmed: 8824597
Mol Microbiol. 2005 Jan;55(1):125-36
pubmed: 15612922
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 May 4;46(8):3937-3952
pubmed: 29529244
Front Microbiol. 2014 Feb 11;5:38
pubmed: 24575082
BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2019 Jul 18;20(1):26
pubmed: 31319794
Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2017 Oct 04;2(3):176-191
pubmed: 29318198
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 10;109(2):E42-50
pubmed: 22184251
mBio. 2017 Feb 28;8(1):
pubmed: 28246358
Nat Microbiol. 2019 Jul;4(7):1105-1113
pubmed: 30962569
PLoS Genet. 2015 Apr 13;11(4):e1005156
pubmed: 25875621
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D74-D77
pubmed: 30364951
EcoSal Plus. 2008 Sep;3(1):
pubmed: 26443740
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D733-45
pubmed: 26553804
RNA. 2012 Dec;18(12):2201-19
pubmed: 23097430
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2017 Feb;52(1):96-106
pubmed: 28006965
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019 Jul 26;17:1047-1055
pubmed: 31452857
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2017 Aug 9;81(3):
pubmed: 28794225
Sci Adv. 2016 Apr 22;2(4):e1501914
pubmed: 27152358
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Mar;8(3):185-95
pubmed: 20140026