mRNA profiling of mock casework samples: Results of a FoRNAP collaborative exercise.
Blood Chemical Analysis
Cervix Mucus
/ chemistry
DNA
/ analysis
Electrophoresis, Capillary
Forensic Genetics
/ methods
Genetic Markers
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Laboratories
Menstruation
Microsatellite Repeats
Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA, Messenger
/ genetics
Saliva
/ chemistry
Semen
/ chemistry
Skin
/ chemistry
Body fluid identification
Casework
Forensics
Gene expression
mRNA profiling
Journal
Forensic science international. Genetics
ISSN: 1878-0326
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Int Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101317016
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
14
05
2020
revised:
02
10
2020
accepted:
12
10
2020
pubmed:
22
11
2020
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
21
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In recent years, forensic mRNA profiling has increasingly been used to identify the origin of human body fluids. By now, several laboratories have implemented mRNA profiling and also use it in criminal casework. In 2018 the FoRNAP (Forensic RNA Profiling) group was established among a number of these laboratories with the aim of sharing experiences, discussing optimization potential, identifying challenges and suggesting solutions with regards to mRNA profiling and casework. To compare mRNA profiling methods and results a collaborative exercise was organized within the FoRNAP group. Seven laboratories from four countries received 16 stains, comprising six pure body fluid / tissue stains and ten mock casework samples. The laboratories were asked to analyze the provided stains with their in-house method (PCR/CE or MPS) and markers of choice. Five laboratories used a DNA/RNA co-extraction strategy. Overall, up to 11 mRNA markers per body fluid were analyzed. We found that mRNA profiling using different extraction and analysis methods as well as different multiplexes can be applied to casework-like samples. In general, high input samples were typed with high accuracy by all laboratories, regardless of the method used. Irrespective of the analysis strategy, samples of low input or mixed stains were more challenging to analyze and interpret since, alike to DNA profiling, a higher number of markers dropped out and/or additional unexpected markers not consistent with the cell type in question were detected. It could be shown that a plethora of different but valid analysis and interpretation strategies exist and are successfully applied in the Forensic Genetics community. Nevertheless, efforts aiming at optimizing and harmonizing interpretation approaches in order to achieve a higher consistency between laboratories might be desirable in the future. The simultaneous extraction of DNA alongside RNA showed to be an effective approach to identify not only the body fluid present but also to identify the donor(s) of the stain. This allows investigators to gain valuable information about the origin of crime scene samples and the course of events in a crime case.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33220528
pii: S1872-4973(20)30181-2
doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102409
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Genetic Markers
0
RNA, Messenger
0
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102409Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.