Genetic characterization of a mild isolate of papaya ringspot virus type-P (PRSV-P) and assessment of its cross-protection potential under greenhouse and field conditions.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
15
10
2020
accepted:
20
01
2021
entrez:
5
2
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2021
medline:
2
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A mild isolate of Papaya ringspot virus type-P, abbreviated as PRSV-mild, from Ecuador was sequenced and characterized. The most distinguishing symptom induced by PRSV-mild was gray powder-like leaf patches radiating from secondary veins. In greenhouse experiments, PRSV-mild did not confer durable protection against a severe isolate of the virus (PRSV-sev), obtained from the same field. Furthermore, isolate specific detection in mixed-infected plants showed that PRSV-sev becomes dominant in infections, rendering PRSV-mild undetectable at 90-120 days post superinfection. Virus testing using isolate-specific primers detected PRSV-mild in two out of five surveyed provinces, with 10% and 48% of incidence in Santo Domingo and Los Ríos, respectively. Comparative genomics showed that PRSV-mild lacks two amino acids from the coat protein region, whereas amino acid determinants for asymptomatic phenotypes were not identified. Recombination events were not predicted in the genomes of the Ecuadorean isolates. Phylogenetic analyses placed both PRSV-mild and PRSV-sev in a clade that includes an additional PRSV isolate from Ecuador and others from South America.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33544737
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241652
pii: PONE-D-20-32443
pmc: PMC7864462
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0241652Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549
pubmed: 29722887
Virus Res. 2011 Aug;159(2):132-40
pubmed: 21549774
J Virol. 2016 Nov 14;90(23):10886-10905
pubmed: 27681136
Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2009 May;Chapter 16:Unit 16B.6
pubmed: 19412912
Mol Plant Pathol. 2008 May;9(3):269-80
pubmed: 18705869
Arch Virol. 2000;145(4):835-43
pubmed: 10893161
Virus Evol. 2015 May 26;1(1):vev003
pubmed: 27774277
J Gen Virol. 1998 Dec;79 ( Pt 12):3119-22
pubmed: 9880030
J Gen Virol. 2002 Oct;83(Pt 10):2575-2585
pubmed: 12237441
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 12;10:1439
pubmed: 31798606
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1998;36:415-37
pubmed: 15012507
Mol Plant Pathol. 2005 Jul 1;6(4):471-87
pubmed: 20565672
Virusdisease. 2019 Jun;30(2):261-268
pubmed: 31179365
Plant Dis. 2019 Apr;103(4):737-747
pubmed: 30856073
Plant Dis. 1998 Feb;82(2):171-175
pubmed: 30856795
Arch Virol. 2014 Feb;159(2):277-89
pubmed: 23979176
J Gen Virol. 1999 Dec;80 ( Pt 12):3281-3288
pubmed: 10567662
Arch Virol. 2010 Mar;155(3):397-401
pubmed: 20112122
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Sep 1;88(17):7887-91
pubmed: 1881922
Phytopathology. 2008 May;98(5):541-6
pubmed: 18943221
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008 Aug;21(8):1046-57
pubmed: 18616401
Phytopathology. 2000 May;90(5):467-73
pubmed: 18944551
Biochem Genet. 2008 Dec;46(11-12):835-46
pubmed: 18807167
J Gen Virol. 1992 Oct;73 ( Pt 10):2531-41
pubmed: 1402799