Factors that influence bidirectional long-tract homozygosis due to double-strand break repair in Candida albicans.


Journal

Genetics
ISSN: 1943-2631
Titre abrégé: Genetics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374636

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 05 2021
Historique:
received: 06 11 2020
accepted: 02 02 2021
pubmed: 12 3 2021
medline: 19 2 2022
entrez: 11 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Genomic rearrangements have been associated with the acquisition of adaptive phenotypes, allowing organisms to efficiently generate new favorable genetic combinations. The diploid genome of Candida albicans is highly plastic, displaying numerous genomic rearrangements that are often the by-product of the repair of DNA breaks. For example, DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) repair using homologous-recombination pathways are a major source of loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH), observed ubiquitously in both clinical and laboratory strains of C. albicans. Mechanisms such as break-induced replication (BIR) or mitotic crossover (MCO) can result in long tracts of LOH, spanning hundreds of kilobases until the telomere. Analysis of I-SceI-induced BIR/MCO tracts in C. albicans revealed that the homozygosis tracts can ascend several kilobases toward the centromere, displaying homozygosis from the break site toward the centromere. We sought to investigate the molecular mechanisms that could contribute to this phenotype by characterizing a series of C. albicans DNA repair mutants, including pol32-/-, msh2-/-, mph1-/-, and mus81-/-. The impact of deleting these genes on genome stability revealed functional differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae (a model DNA repair organism) and C. albicans. In addition, we demonstrated that ascending LOH tracts toward the centromere are associated with intrinsic features of BIR and potentially involve the mismatch repair pathway which acts upon natural heterozygous positions. Overall, this mechanistic approach to study LOH deepens our limited characterization of DNA repair pathways in C. albicans and brings forth the notion that centromere proximal alleles from DNA break sites are not guarded from undergoing LOH.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33705548
pii: 6168430
doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab028
pmc: PMC8552485
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014 Mar;78(1):1-39
pubmed: 24600039
FEMS Yeast Res. 2009 Oct;9(7):1061-9
pubmed: 19622074
Cell Host Microbe. 2019 Mar 13;25(3):418-431.e6
pubmed: 30824263
Eukaryot Cell. 2015 Mar;14(3):311-22
pubmed: 25595446
DNA Repair (Amst). 2015 May;29:47-55
pubmed: 25737057
PLoS Genet. 2010 May 13;6(5):e1000948
pubmed: 20485519
Mol Cell. 2010 Dec 22;40(6):988-1000
pubmed: 21172663
Gene. 2004 Oct 27;341:119-27
pubmed: 15474295
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):E8688-E8697
pubmed: 30150418
PLoS Genet. 2019 May 15;15(5):e1008137
pubmed: 31091232
Mol Microbiol. 2005 Mar;55(5):1553-65
pubmed: 15720560
Mol Microbiol. 2008 May;68(3):624-41
pubmed: 18363649
Science. 2018 Nov 2;362(6414):589-595
pubmed: 30385579
Elife. 2019 Jun 07;8:
pubmed: 31172944
Cell Rep. 2014 Jun 12;7(5):1640-1648
pubmed: 24882007
mBio. 2016 Oct 11;7(5):
pubmed: 27729506
Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1822-6
pubmed: 15205536
Genome Res. 2015 Mar;25(3):413-25
pubmed: 25504520
Trends Genet. 2019 Apr;35(4):292-307
pubmed: 30826131
mBio. 2018 Sep 18;9(5):
pubmed: 30228236
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 19;97(26):14500-5
pubmed: 11121053
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Apr;38(6):1889-901
pubmed: 20047969
PLoS Genet. 2006 Mar;2(3):e32
pubmed: 16532063
Genetics. 2000 Oct;156(2):571-8
pubmed: 11014807
G3 (Bethesda). 2011 Dec;1(7):523-30
pubmed: 22384363
PLoS Biol. 2011 Feb 15;9(2):e1000594
pubmed: 21347245
Cancer Res. 2007 Sep 15;67(18):8527-35
pubmed: 17875692
Nature. 2007 Aug 16;448(7155):820-3
pubmed: 17671506
PLoS Biol. 2019 Sep 30;17(9):e3000464
pubmed: 31568516
Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):2289-93
pubmed: 14704204
mSphere. 2016 Jun 15;1(3):
pubmed: 27340698
mBio. 2011 Jul 26;2(4):
pubmed: 21791579
PLoS Biol. 2014 Mar 18;12(3):e1001815
pubmed: 24642609
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jul;42(Web Server issue):W401-7
pubmed: 24861617
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Oct;1790(10):963-9
pubmed: 19344750
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Oct 10;47(18):9666-9684
pubmed: 31392335
mSphere. 2018 Apr 25;3(2):
pubmed: 29695624
Eukaryot Cell. 2007 Dec;6(12):2194-205
pubmed: 17965250
Genetics. 2016 Jul;203(3):1161-76
pubmed: 27206717
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 16;96(6):2970-5
pubmed: 10077621
Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Apr;19(4):3177-83
pubmed: 10082584
mBio. 2017 May 30;8(3):
pubmed: 28559486
Genes Dev. 2001 May 1;15(9):1055-60
pubmed: 11331601
Mol Cell. 2017 Feb 2;65(3):515-526.e3
pubmed: 28065599
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 22;9(1):2563
pubmed: 30796326
PLoS Genet. 2018 Aug 9;14(8):e1007543
pubmed: 30091972
Mol Biol Cell. 2007 Mar;18(3):815-26
pubmed: 17182857
Nature. 2007 May 3;447(7140):102-5
pubmed: 17410126
J Fungi (Basel). 2019 Dec 27;6(1):
pubmed: 31892130
Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):963-73
pubmed: 1459447
FEBS Lett. 2017 Jul;591(14):2048-2056
pubmed: 28640495
DNA Repair (Amst). 2020 Jan;85:102733
pubmed: 31698199
Nature. 2013 Feb 7;494(7435):55-9
pubmed: 23364695
Mol Cell. 2019 Mar 21;73(6):1255-1266.e4
pubmed: 30737186
J Basic Microbiol. 2006;46(5):416-29
pubmed: 17009297
Genes (Basel). 2020 Apr 14;11(4):
pubmed: 32295266
Eukaryot Cell. 2007 Oct;6(10):1889-904
pubmed: 17693596
Genetics. 2002 Apr;160(4):1409-22
pubmed: 11973297
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 29;7:11128
pubmed: 27020939
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 8;9(1):2253
pubmed: 29884848
Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 15;34(18):3094-3100
pubmed: 29750242
Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Feb;25(3):933-44
pubmed: 15657422
Genes Dev. 2009 Jan 1;23(1):67-79
pubmed: 19136626

Auteurs

Timea Marton (T)

Institut Pasteur, INRA, Unité Biologie et Pathogénicité Fongiques, Paris, France.
Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Murielle Chauvel (M)

Institut Pasteur, INRA, Unité Biologie et Pathogénicité Fongiques, Paris, France.

Adeline Feri (A)

Institut Pasteur, INRA, Unité Biologie et Pathogénicité Fongiques, Paris, France.
Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Corinne Maufrais (C)

Institut Pasteur, INRA, Unité Biologie et Pathogénicité Fongiques, Paris, France.
Hub de Bioinformatique et Biostatistique, Département de Biologie Computationnelle, USR 3756 IP CNRS, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.

Christophe D'enfert (C)

Institut Pasteur, INRA, Unité Biologie et Pathogénicité Fongiques, Paris, France.

Mélanie Legrand (M)

Institut Pasteur, INRA, Unité Biologie et Pathogénicité Fongiques, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory Lung Neoplasms Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) Animals Humans

Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations inhibit melanoma metastasis.

Spencer D Shelton, Sara House, Luiza Martins Nascentes Melo et al.
1.00
DNA, Mitochondrial Humans Melanoma Mutation Neoplasm Metastasis

Prevalence and implications of fragile X premutation screening in Thailand.

Areerat Hnoonual, Sunita Kaewfai, Chanin Limwongse et al.
1.00
Humans Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Thailand Male Female
Humans Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) Pancreatic Neoplasms T-Lymphocytes

Classifications MeSH