GABAergic cortical network physiology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
Aged
Cerebral Cortex
/ metabolism
Cross-Over Studies
Double-Blind Method
Female
Frontotemporal Dementia
/ drug therapy
GABA Uptake Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Magnetoencephalography
Male
Models, Neurological
Nerve Net
/ drug effects
Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive
/ drug therapy
Synaptic Transmission
/ drug effects
Tiagabine
/ therapeutic use
gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
/ metabolism
GABA
conductance-based modelling
dynamic causal modelling
frontotemporal dementia
progressive supranuclear palsy
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 08 2021
17 08 2021
Historique:
received:
24
07
2020
revised:
31
12
2020
accepted:
03
01
2021
pubmed:
13
3
2021
medline:
25
9
2021
entrez:
12
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The clinical syndromes caused by frontotemporal lobar degeneration are heterogeneous, including the behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and progressive supranuclear palsy. Although pathologically distinct, they share many behavioural, cognitive and physiological features, which may in part arise from common deficits of major neurotransmitters such as γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Here, we quantify the GABAergic impairment and its restoration with dynamic causal modelling of a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover pharmaco-magnetoencephalography study. We analysed 17 patients with bvFTD, 15 patients with progressive supranuclear palsy, and 20 healthy age- and gender-matched controls. In addition to neuropsychological assessment and structural MRI, participants undertook two magnetoencephalography sessions using a roving auditory oddball paradigm: once on placebo and once on 10 mg of the oral GABA reuptake inhibitor tiagabine. A subgroup underwent ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurement of GABA concentration, which was reduced among patients. We identified deficits in frontotemporal processing using conductance-based biophysical models of local and global neuronal networks. The clinical relevance of this physiological deficit is indicated by the correlation between top-down connectivity from frontal to temporal cortex and clinical measures of cognitive and behavioural change. A critical validation of the biophysical modelling approach was evidence from parametric empirical Bayes analysis that GABA levels in patients, measured by spectroscopy, were related to posterior estimates of patients' GABAergic synaptic connectivity. Further evidence for the role of GABA in frontotemporal lobar degeneration came from confirmation that the effects of tiagabine on local circuits depended not only on participant group, but also on individual baseline GABA levels. Specifically, the phasic inhibition of deep cortico-cortical pyramidal neurons following tiagabine, but not placebo, was a function of GABA concentration. The study provides proof-of-concept for the potential of dynamic causal modelling to elucidate mechanisms of human neurodegenerative disease, and explains the variation in response to candidate therapies among patients. The laminar- and neurotransmitter-specific features of the modelling framework, can be used to study other treatment approaches and disorders. In the context of frontotemporal lobar degeneration, we suggest that neurophysiological restoration in selected patients, by targeting neurotransmitter deficits, could be used to bridge between clinical and preclinical models of disease, and inform the personalized selection of drugs and stratification of patients for future clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33710299
pii: 6168993
doi: 10.1093/brain/awab097
pmc: PMC8370432
doi:
Substances chimiques
GABA Uptake Inhibitors
0
gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
56-12-2
Tiagabine
Z80I64HMNP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2135-2145Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00005/12
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M008983/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M009041/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 103838
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U105597119
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.