Impacts of allopolyploidization and structural variation on intraspecific diversification in Brassica rapa.


Journal

Genome biology
ISSN: 1474-760X
Titre abrégé: Genome Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100960660

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 05 2021
Historique:
received: 01 03 2021
accepted: 20 05 2021
entrez: 1 6 2021
pubmed: 2 6 2021
medline: 21 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite the prevalence and recurrence of polyploidization in the speciation of flowering plants, its impacts on crop intraspecific genome diversification are largely unknown. Brassica rapa is a mesopolyploid species that is domesticated into many subspecies with distinctive morphotypes. Herein, we report the consequences of the whole-genome triplication (WGT) on intraspecific diversification using a pan-genome analysis of 16 de novo assembled and two reported genomes. Among the genes that derive from WGT, 13.42% of polyploidy-derived genes accumulate more transposable elements and non-synonymous mutations than other genes during individual genome evolution. We denote such genes as being "flexible." We construct the Brassica rapa ancestral genome and observe the continuing influence of the dominant subgenome on intraspecific diversification in B. rapa. The gene flexibility is biased to the more fractionated subgenomes (MFs), in contrast to the more intact gene content of the dominant LF (least fractionated) subgenome. Furthermore, polyploidy-derived flexible syntenic genes are implicated in the response to stimulus and the phytohormone auxin; this may reflect adaptation to the environment. Using an integrated graph-based genome, we investigate the structural variation (SV) landscapes in 524 B. rapa genomes. We observe that SVs track morphotype domestication. Four out of 266 candidate genes for Chinese cabbage domestication are speculated to be involved in the leafy head formation. This pan-genome uncovers the possible contributions of allopolyploidization on intraspecific diversification and the possible and underexplored role of SVs in favorable trait domestication. Collectively, our work serves as a rich resource for genome-based B. rapa improvement.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Despite the prevalence and recurrence of polyploidization in the speciation of flowering plants, its impacts on crop intraspecific genome diversification are largely unknown. Brassica rapa is a mesopolyploid species that is domesticated into many subspecies with distinctive morphotypes.
RESULTS
Herein, we report the consequences of the whole-genome triplication (WGT) on intraspecific diversification using a pan-genome analysis of 16 de novo assembled and two reported genomes. Among the genes that derive from WGT, 13.42% of polyploidy-derived genes accumulate more transposable elements and non-synonymous mutations than other genes during individual genome evolution. We denote such genes as being "flexible." We construct the Brassica rapa ancestral genome and observe the continuing influence of the dominant subgenome on intraspecific diversification in B. rapa. The gene flexibility is biased to the more fractionated subgenomes (MFs), in contrast to the more intact gene content of the dominant LF (least fractionated) subgenome. Furthermore, polyploidy-derived flexible syntenic genes are implicated in the response to stimulus and the phytohormone auxin; this may reflect adaptation to the environment. Using an integrated graph-based genome, we investigate the structural variation (SV) landscapes in 524 B. rapa genomes. We observe that SVs track morphotype domestication. Four out of 266 candidate genes for Chinese cabbage domestication are speculated to be involved in the leafy head formation.
CONCLUSIONS
This pan-genome uncovers the possible contributions of allopolyploidization on intraspecific diversification and the possible and underexplored role of SVs in favorable trait domestication. Collectively, our work serves as a rich resource for genome-based B. rapa improvement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34059118
doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02383-2
pii: 10.1186/s13059-021-02383-2
pmc: PMC8166115
doi:

Banques de données

figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.14571297.v1.']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

166

Références

Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012;63:535-62
pubmed: 22404465
Nat Genet. 2019 Jun;51(6):1044-1051
pubmed: 31086351
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Apr;32(4):1063-71
pubmed: 25573906
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Feb;10(1):13-20
pubmed: 17140842
Nat Plants. 2020 Aug;6(8):929-941
pubmed: 32782408
Syst Biol. 2007 Aug;56(4):564-77
pubmed: 17654362
Science. 2008 Apr 25;320(5875):481-3
pubmed: 18436776
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017 Apr;36:79-87
pubmed: 28242534
Plant Physiol. 2018 Feb;176(2):1410-1422
pubmed: 29233850
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2020 Apr;54:108-113
pubmed: 32344327
New Phytol. 2018 Oct;220(1):87-93
pubmed: 29882360
Genome Res. 2002 Dec;12(12):1805-14
pubmed: 12466284
Nat Genet. 2018 Sep;50(9):1289-1295
pubmed: 30061735
Plant Biotechnol J. 2019 May;17(5):881-892
pubmed: 30315621
Hortic Res. 2018 Aug 15;5:50
pubmed: 30131865
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012 Apr;15(2):131-9
pubmed: 22341793
Science. 2017 Apr 7;356(6333):92-95
pubmed: 28336562
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May 15;29(7):644-52
pubmed: 21572440
Cell Syst. 2016 Jul;3(1):95-8
pubmed: 27467249
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Apr;13(2):153-9
pubmed: 20031477
Genome Biol. 2004;5(2):R12
pubmed: 14759262
Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 20;11(1):989
pubmed: 32080174
Cell Syst. 2018 Feb 28;6(2):256-258.e1
pubmed: 29428417
PLoS Genet. 2018 Mar 28;14(3):e1007267
pubmed: 29590103
Genetics. 2006 Jan;172(1):507-17
pubmed: 16172500
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D211-5
pubmed: 18940856
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1312-3
pubmed: 24451623
Front Plant Sci. 2012 Aug 30;3:198
pubmed: 22969786
Genome Biol. 2015 Dec 10;16:262
pubmed: 26653025
Genome Res. 2004 May;14(5):988-95
pubmed: 15123596
Genome Biol. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):277
pubmed: 31842948
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2320-5
pubmed: 17406474
Genes Dev. 2009 Sep 1;23(17):1986-97
pubmed: 19723761
Mol Plant. 2020 Aug 3;13(8):1194-1202
pubmed: 32585190
Cell. 2020 Jul 9;182(1):145-161.e23
pubmed: 32553272
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Feb;8(1):59-66
pubmed: 15653401
Nat Plants. 2020 Jan;6(1):34-45
pubmed: 31932676
Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 1;34(17):i884-i890
pubmed: 30423086
BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Aug 28;12:151
pubmed: 22925611
Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):913-8
pubmed: 17943131
Theor Appl Genet. 2020 Nov;133(11):3187-3199
pubmed: 32772134
Science. 2018 Jun 8;360(6393):
pubmed: 29880660
Nat Genet. 2017 Nov;49(11):1654-1660
pubmed: 28945251
Nat Rev Genet. 2017 Jul;18(7):411-424
pubmed: 28502977
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Apr;24(4):352-365
pubmed: 30745056
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W451-4
pubmed: 15980510
Nat Plants. 2016 Aug 01;2:16115
pubmed: 27479829
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Oct 1;31(19):5654-66
pubmed: 14500829
Genome Biol. 2021 May 31;22(1):166
pubmed: 34059118
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 27;102(39):13950-5
pubmed: 16172379
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018 Apr;42:1-7
pubmed: 29107221
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Oct;36(9):875-879
pubmed: 30125266
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 8;108(10):4069-74
pubmed: 21368132
Genome Res. 2006 Jul;16(7):934-46
pubmed: 16760422
Nat Plants. 2018 May;4(5):258-268
pubmed: 29725103
Nat Commun. 2017 Dec 19;8(1):2184
pubmed: 29259172
Nat Genet. 2011 Aug 28;43(10):1035-9
pubmed: 21873998
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D8-D14
pubmed: 30365034
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Dec 11;30(1):105-11
pubmed: 22158310
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Aug 1;34(8):1825-1832
pubmed: 28430989
New Phytol. 2016 Jul;211(1):288-99
pubmed: 26871271
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 1;27(15):2156-8
pubmed: 21653522
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016 Apr;30:159-65
pubmed: 27064530
Nat Genet. 2018 Feb;50(2):278-284
pubmed: 29335547
Fly (Austin). 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):80-92
pubmed: 22728672
Plant Biotechnol J. 2021 May;19(5):966-976
pubmed: 33283404
Genome Biol. 2019 May 24;20(1):104
pubmed: 31126314
Genome Biol. 2019 Nov 14;20(1):238
pubmed: 31727128
Science. 2014 Aug 22;345(6199):950-3
pubmed: 25146293
Plant Cell. 2017 Sep;29(9):2150-2167
pubmed: 28814644
Genome Biol. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):278
pubmed: 31842956
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2009 Mar;Chapter 4:4.10.1-4.10.14
pubmed: 19274634
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36442
pubmed: 22567157
Nat Genet. 2017 Apr;49(4):579-587
pubmed: 28263319
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 5;369(1648):
pubmed: 24958926
Nature. 2012 Dec 20;492(7429):423-7
pubmed: 23257886
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Jan 26;14(1):e1005944
pubmed: 29373581
Nat Genet. 2016 Oct;48(10):1218-24
pubmed: 27526322
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2015 Dec;35:110-8
pubmed: 26657818
Nat Methods. 2015 Aug;12(8):780-6
pubmed: 26121404
Genome Biol. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):275
pubmed: 31843001
Nat Plants. 2019 Jan;5(1):54-62
pubmed: 30598532
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60
pubmed: 25751142
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Nov;7(11):847-59
pubmed: 16990790
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 07;7:42229
pubmed: 28169368
Plant Cell. 2014 May 16;26(5):1878-1900
pubmed: 24838975
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W265-8
pubmed: 17485477
Genome Biol. 2008 Jan 11;9(1):R7
pubmed: 18190707
Cell. 2020 Jul 9;182(1):162-176.e13
pubmed: 32553274
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Nov 12;11:577536
pubmed: 33281844
Nat Commun. 2014 May 23;5:3930
pubmed: 24852848
Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 15;34(18):3094-3100
pubmed: 29750242
Genome Res. 2017 May;27(5):787-792
pubmed: 28130360
Science. 2014 Jul 18;345(6194):1250091
pubmed: 25035498
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Mar 1;35(3):543-548
pubmed: 29220515
Nat Plants. 2018 Nov;4(11):879-887
pubmed: 30390080
Nature. 2017 Aug 3;548(7665):87-91
pubmed: 28746312
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jan 20;33(2):511-8
pubmed: 15661851
New Phytol. 2015 Jul;207(2):454-467
pubmed: 26053261
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005 Dec;15(6):589-94
pubmed: 16185861
Mol Cell. 2014 Sep 4;55(5):678-93
pubmed: 25132176
Nat Commun. 2016 Nov 11;7:13390
pubmed: 27834372
Plant Cell. 2013 May;25(5):1541-54
pubmed: 23653472

Auteurs

Xu Cai (X)

Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.

Lichun Chang (L)

Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.

Tingting Zhang (T)

Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.

Haixu Chen (H)

Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.

Lei Zhang (L)

Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.

Runmao Lin (R)

Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.

Jianli Liang (J)

Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.

Jian Wu (J)

Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.

Michael Freeling (M)

Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Xiaowu Wang (X)

Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. wangxiaowu@caas.cn.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Animals Hemiptera Insect Proteins Phylogeny Insecticides
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family

Classifications MeSH