A comparative study of teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate within the Swedish MS Registry.


Journal

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)
ISSN: 1477-0970
Titre abrégé: Mult Scler
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9509185

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 4 6 2021
medline: 17 3 2022
entrez: 3 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are first-line disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis with similar labels that are used in comparable populations. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and persistence of teriflunomide and DMF in a Swedish real-world setting. All relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients in the Swedish MS registry initiating teriflunomide or DMF were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was treatment persistence. Propensity score matching was used to adjust comparisons for baseline confounders. A total of 353 teriflunomide patients were successfully matched to 353 DMF. There was no difference in the rate of overall treatment discontinuation by treatment group across the entire observation period (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.91-1.39; This population-based real-world study reports similarities in treatment persistence, clinical effectiveness and quality of life outcomes between teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are first-line disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis with similar labels that are used in comparable populations.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and persistence of teriflunomide and DMF in a Swedish real-world setting.
METHODS METHODS
All relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients in the Swedish MS registry initiating teriflunomide or DMF were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was treatment persistence. Propensity score matching was used to adjust comparisons for baseline confounders.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 353 teriflunomide patients were successfully matched to 353 DMF. There was no difference in the rate of overall treatment discontinuation by treatment group across the entire observation period (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.91-1.39;
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This population-based real-world study reports similarities in treatment persistence, clinical effectiveness and quality of life outcomes between teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34080926
doi: 10.1177/13524585211019649
pmc: PMC8795225
doi:

Substances chimiques

Crotonates 0
Hydroxybutyrates 0
Immunosuppressive Agents 0
Nitriles 0
Toluidines 0
teriflunomide 1C058IKG3B
Dimethyl Fumarate FO2303MNI2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

237-246

Références

Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018 Sep 10;11:1756286418796404
pubmed: 30210582
Epidemiology. 2019 Mar;30(2):230-233
pubmed: 30721167
Mult Scler. 2012 Sep;18(9):1278-89
pubmed: 22307384
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Mar;13(3):247-56
pubmed: 24461574
J Neurol. 2020 Oct;267(10):3008-3020
pubmed: 32506391
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;90(4):458-468
pubmed: 30636699
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1293-303
pubmed: 21991951
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1087-97
pubmed: 22992072
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Oct;13(10):977-86
pubmed: 25192851
Lancet. 2008 Oct 25;372(9648):1463-72
pubmed: 18970976
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1098-107
pubmed: 22992073
Neurology. 2019 Aug 13;93(7):e635-e646
pubmed: 31300547
Neurology. 2019 Apr 16;92(16):e1811-e1820
pubmed: 30877188
Acta Neurol Scand. 2015;132(199):11-9
pubmed: 26046553
Brain. 2001 May;124(Pt 5):962-73
pubmed: 11335698
Mult Scler. 2014 May;20(6):705-16
pubmed: 24126064
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Apr;30(4):613-27
pubmed: 24195574
Neurology. 2006 Mar 28;66(6):894-900
pubmed: 16567708
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Mar;18(3):269-285
pubmed: 30679040

Auteurs

Jan Hillert (J)

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Jon A Tsai (JA)

Sanofi, Stockholm, Sweden.

Mona Nouhi (M)

Sanofi, Stockholm, Sweden.

Anna Glaser (A)

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Tim Spelman (T)

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH