Fetal exome sequencing for isolated increased nuchal translucency: should we be doing it?
Fetal diagnosis and therapy
Genetics
Perinatal diagnosis-invasive
Perinatal diagnosis-ultrasound
Journal
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
ISSN: 1471-0528
Titre abrégé: BJOG
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100935741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
revised:
22
05
2021
received:
09
02
2021
accepted:
17
06
2021
pubmed:
20
8
2021
medline:
22
1
2022
entrez:
19
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the utility of prenatal exome sequencing (ES) for isolated increased nuchal translucency (NT) and to investigate factors that increase diagnostic yield. Retrospective analysis of data from two prospective cohort studies. Fetal medicine centres in the UK and USA. Fetuses with increased NT ≥3.5 mm at 11-14 weeks of gestation recruited to the Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes (PAGE) and Columbia fetal whole exome sequencing studies (n = 213). We grouped cases based on (1) the presence of additional structural abnormalities at presentation in the first trimester or later in pregnancy, and (2) NT measurement at presentation. We compared diagnostic rates between groups using Fisher exact test. Detection of diagnostic genetic variants considered to have caused the observed fetal structural anomaly. Diagnostic variants were detected in 12 (22.2%) of 54 fetuses presenting with non-isolated increased NT, 12 (32.4%) of 37 fetuses with isolated increased NT in the first trimester and additional abnormalities later in pregnancy, and 2 (1.8%) of 111 fetuses with isolated increased NT in the first trimester and no other abnormalities on subsequent scans. Diagnostic rate also increased with increasing size of NT. The diagnostic yield of prenatal ES is low for fetuses with isolated increased NT but significantly higher where there are additional structural anomalies. Prenatal ES may not be appropriate for truly isolated increased NT but timely, careful ultrasound scanning to identify other anomalies emerging later can direct testing to focus where there is a higher likelihood of diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34411415
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16869
pmc: PMC9292445
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
52-61Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Health Innovation Challenge Fund (HICF) from the UK Department of Health and Wellcome Trust
ID : HICF-R7-396
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):758-767
pubmed: 30712878
Genome Med. 2018 Sep 28;10(1):74
pubmed: 30266093
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Jan;38(1):10-19
pubmed: 28654730
Prenat Diagn. 2010 Feb;30(2):93-102
pubmed: 20077440
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):747-757
pubmed: 30712880
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Jan;40(2):197-205
pubmed: 31697852
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Aug;251:119-124
pubmed: 32502767
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):80-86
pubmed: 29947050
Front Genet. 2019 Aug 16;10:761
pubmed: 31475041
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):52-61
pubmed: 34411415
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;55(3):383-390
pubmed: 31115076
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;30(1):11-8
pubmed: 17559183
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;192(4):1005-21
pubmed: 15846173
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Oct;40(11):1426-1431
pubmed: 32668055