The adaptive challenge of extreme conditions shapes evolutionary diversity of plant assemblages at continental scales.


Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 09 2021
Historique:
accepted: 07 06 2021
entrez: 10 9 2021
pubmed: 11 9 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The tropical conservatism hypothesis (TCH) posits that the latitudinal gradient in biological diversity arises because most extant clades of animals and plants originated when tropical environments were more widespread and because the colonization of colder and more seasonal temperate environments is limited by the phylogenetically conserved environmental tolerances of these tropical clades. Recent studies have claimed support of the TCH, indicating that temperate plant diversity stems from a few more recently derived lineages that are nested within tropical clades, with the colonization of the temperate zone being associated with key adaptations to survive colder temperatures and regular freezing. Drought, however, is an additional physiological stress that could shape diversity gradients. Here, we evaluate patterns of evolutionary diversity in plant assemblages spanning the full extent of climatic gradients in North and South America. We find that in both hemispheres, extratropical dry biomes house the lowest evolutionary diversity, while tropical moist forests and many temperate mixed forests harbor the highest. Together, our results support a more nuanced view of the TCH, with environments that are radically different from the ancestral niche of angiosperms having limited, phylogenetically clustered diversity relative to environments that show lower levels of deviation from this niche. Thus, we argue that ongoing expansion of arid environments is likely to entail higher loss of evolutionary diversity not just in the wet tropics but in many extratropical moist regions as well.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34504011
pii: 2021132118
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021132118
pmc: PMC8449343
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing interest.

Références

Sci Adv. 2020 May 06;6(19):eaaz5373
pubmed: 32494713
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 24;10(1):1188
pubmed: 31980639
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Apr;32(4):258-267
pubmed: 28214038
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 7;274(1628):2915-23
pubmed: 17878143
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 1;26(11):1463-4
pubmed: 20395285
Nature. 2017 Jun 1;546(7656):141-144
pubmed: 28538726
Science. 2003 Aug 15;301(5635):961-4
pubmed: 12920297
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1:11549-55
pubmed: 18695216
PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4390
pubmed: 19194509
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 3;104(14):5925-30
pubmed: 17379667
BMC Ecol. 2011 Nov 24;11:27
pubmed: 22115315
Conserv Biol. 2021 Jun;35(3):897-908
pubmed: 32841461
Ecology. 2009 Dec;90(12):3566-74
pubmed: 20120823
Ecol Lett. 2010 Oct;13(10):1310-24
pubmed: 20649638
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13384-9
pubmed: 17686977
Am Nat. 2002 Dec;160(6):712-26
pubmed: 18707460
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Nov;22(11):3583-3593
pubmed: 27207728
Nature. 2014 Feb 6;506(7486):89-92
pubmed: 24362564
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Oct;20(10):3177-90
pubmed: 24817483
Am Nat. 2004 Feb;163(2):192-211
pubmed: 14970922
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Feb;15(2):70-76
pubmed: 10652559
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Oct 29;359(1450):1551-71
pubmed: 15519972
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 28;5:13487
pubmed: 26316255
Ecol Lett. 2014 Oct;17(10):1326-38
pubmed: 24975818
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):8125-30
pubmed: 24847062
Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):675-8
pubmed: 17833420
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Dec;19(12):639-44
pubmed: 16701326
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 1;106(48):20359-64
pubmed: 19918050
Am J Bot. 2018 Mar;105(3):302-314
pubmed: 29746720

Auteurs

Danilo M Neves (DM)

Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil; dneves@icb.ufmg.br.

Andrew J Kerkhoff (AJ)

Department of Biology, Kenyon College, Gambier, OH 43022.

Susy Echeverría-Londoño (S)

MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, W2 1PG, United Kingdom.

Cory Merow (C)

Eversource Energy Center, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268.

Naia Morueta-Holme (N)

Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.

Robert K Peet (RK)

Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.

Brody Sandel (B)

Department of Biology, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053.

Jens-Christian Svenning (JC)

Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.

Susan K Wiser (SK)

Ecosystems and Conservation Group, Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand.

Brian J Enquist (BJ)

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Animals Hemiptera Insect Proteins Phylogeny Insecticides
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family

Classifications MeSH