Improving stool sample processing and pyrosequencing for quantifying benzimidazole resistance alleles in Trichuris trichiura and Necator americanus pooled eggs.
Alleles
Animals
Anthelmintics
/ pharmacology
Benzimidazoles
/ pharmacology
DNA Primers
/ genetics
Drug Resistance
Feces
/ parasitology
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
/ methods
Humans
Necator americanus
/ drug effects
Ovum
/ chemistry
Soil
/ parasitology
Specimen Handling
/ methods
Trichuris
/ drug effects
Anthelmintic resistance
Benzimidazoles
Pyrosequencing
Soil-transmitted helminths
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Sep 2021
25 Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
02
02
2021
accepted:
10
08
2021
entrez:
26
9
2021
pubmed:
27
9
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is an urgent need for an extensive evaluation of benzimidazole efficacy in humans. In veterinary science, benzimidazole resistance has been mainly associated with three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the isotype-1 β-tubulin gene. In this study, we optimized the stool sample processing methodology and resistance allele frequency assessment in Trichuris trichiura and Necator americanus anthelmintic-related SNPs by pyrosequencing, and standardized it for large-scale benzimidazole efficacy screening use. Three different protocols for stool sample processing were compared in 19 T. trichiura-positive samples: fresh stool, egg concentration using metallic sieves with decreasing pore size, and egg concentration followed by flotation with saturated salt solution. Yield of each protocol was assessed by estimating the load of parasite DNA by real-time PCR. Then, we sequenced a DNA fragment of the β-tubulin gene containing the putative benzimidazole resistance SNPs in T. trichiura and N. americanus. Afterwards, resistant and susceptible-type plasmids were produced and mixed at different proportions, simulating different resistance levels. These mixtures were used to compare previously described pyrosequencing assays with processes newly designed by our own group. Once the stool sample processing and the pyrosequencing methodology was defined, the utility of the protocols was assessed by measuring the frequencies of putative resistance SNPs in 15 T. trichiura- and 15 N. americanus-positive stool samples. The highest DNA load was provided by egg concentration using metallic sieves with decreasing pore size. Sequencing information of the β-tubulin gene in Mozambican specimens was highly similar to the sequences previously reported, for T. trichiura and N. americanus, despite the origin of the sample. When we compared pyrosequencing assays using plasmids constructs, primers designed in this study provided the most accurate SNP frequencies. When pooled egg samples were analysed, none of resistant SNPs were observed in T. trichiura, whereas 17% of the resistant SNPs at codon 198 were found in one N. americanus sample. We optimized the sample processing methodology and standardized pyrosequencing in soil-transmitted helminth (STH) pooled eggs. These protocols could be used in STH large-scale screenings or anthelmintic efficacy trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is an urgent need for an extensive evaluation of benzimidazole efficacy in humans. In veterinary science, benzimidazole resistance has been mainly associated with three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the isotype-1 β-tubulin gene. In this study, we optimized the stool sample processing methodology and resistance allele frequency assessment in Trichuris trichiura and Necator americanus anthelmintic-related SNPs by pyrosequencing, and standardized it for large-scale benzimidazole efficacy screening use.
METHODS
METHODS
Three different protocols for stool sample processing were compared in 19 T. trichiura-positive samples: fresh stool, egg concentration using metallic sieves with decreasing pore size, and egg concentration followed by flotation with saturated salt solution. Yield of each protocol was assessed by estimating the load of parasite DNA by real-time PCR. Then, we sequenced a DNA fragment of the β-tubulin gene containing the putative benzimidazole resistance SNPs in T. trichiura and N. americanus. Afterwards, resistant and susceptible-type plasmids were produced and mixed at different proportions, simulating different resistance levels. These mixtures were used to compare previously described pyrosequencing assays with processes newly designed by our own group. Once the stool sample processing and the pyrosequencing methodology was defined, the utility of the protocols was assessed by measuring the frequencies of putative resistance SNPs in 15 T. trichiura- and 15 N. americanus-positive stool samples.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The highest DNA load was provided by egg concentration using metallic sieves with decreasing pore size. Sequencing information of the β-tubulin gene in Mozambican specimens was highly similar to the sequences previously reported, for T. trichiura and N. americanus, despite the origin of the sample. When we compared pyrosequencing assays using plasmids constructs, primers designed in this study provided the most accurate SNP frequencies. When pooled egg samples were analysed, none of resistant SNPs were observed in T. trichiura, whereas 17% of the resistant SNPs at codon 198 were found in one N. americanus sample.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We optimized the sample processing methodology and standardized pyrosequencing in soil-transmitted helminth (STH) pooled eggs. These protocols could be used in STH large-scale screenings or anthelmintic efficacy trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34563247
doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04941-w
pii: 10.1186/s13071-021-04941-w
pmc: PMC8466976
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anthelmintics
0
Benzimidazoles
0
DNA Primers
0
Soil
0
benzimidazole
E24GX49LD8
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
490Subventions
Organisme : European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
ID : RIA2017NCT-1845-STOP
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
ID : FJC-2018-38305
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
ID : RYC-2015-18368
Organisme : Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León
ID : LE-135-19
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Mar 2;13(1):114
pubmed: 32122383
BMJ. 2017 Sep 25;358:j4307
pubmed: 28947636
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 12;8(8):e70212
pubmed: 23950913
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Oct 28;13(10):e0007778
pubmed: 31658264
BMC Vet Res. 2017 Mar 20;13(1):71
pubmed: 28320391
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Sep 7;13(1):453
pubmed: 32894163
Vet Sci. 2018 Sep 10;5(3):
pubmed: 30201869
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004 Apr;134(2):281-4
pubmed: 15003848
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Nov 2;12(11):e0006912
pubmed: 30388108
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Dec 8;10(12):e0005113
pubmed: 27930648
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Aug 1;13(8):e0007471
pubmed: 31369562
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W71-4
pubmed: 17485472
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Aug;48(8):2866-71
pubmed: 20554824
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1972 Nov-Dec;14(6):397-400
pubmed: 4675644
Vet Parasitol. 2012 May 25;186(3-4):344-9
pubmed: 22192770
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20458
pubmed: 21738575
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2016 Dec;6(3):230-240
pubmed: 27821282
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2014 Aug 13;4(3):164-84
pubmed: 25516826
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Jun;88(6):1052-61
pubmed: 23458960
Parasitol Res. 2019 Mar;118(3):837-849
pubmed: 30697644
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Dec 9;12(1):576
pubmed: 31818311
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(3):e397
pubmed: 19308251
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2014 Mar;45(2):267-75
pubmed: 24968666
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007 Dec;156(2):167-74
pubmed: 17850900
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Sep 04;8(9):e3126
pubmed: 25187956
Parasitology. 2017 Jun;144(7):965-974
pubmed: 28290266
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1999 Sep 20;103(1):111-6
pubmed: 10514087
JAMA. 2008 Apr 23;299(16):1937-48
pubmed: 18430913
Res Vet Sci. 2019 Apr;123:153-158
pubmed: 30677615
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Jun;88(6):1041-7
pubmed: 23509117
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Sep 17;12(9):e0006766
pubmed: 30222749
Trends Parasitol. 2018 Jul;34(7):590-602
pubmed: 29858018
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 27;4(2):
pubmed: 31035610
Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):252-265
pubmed: 28882382
Trends Parasitol. 2019 Apr;35(4):289-301
pubmed: 30733094
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jul 31;9(7):e0003963
pubmed: 26230990
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Feb 6;14(2):e0007931
pubmed: 32027646
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Feb;100(2):351-356
pubmed: 30734697
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 May 30;7(5):e2247
pubmed: 23738029
BMC Vet Res. 2020 May 11;16(1):132
pubmed: 32393382